From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, pc@us.ibm.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
yao.jin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com,
anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com,
nasastry@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] powerpc/perf: Add json file support for hv_24x7 core level events
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:22:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200716152237.GC373728@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716094216.1418659-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Em Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:12:11PM +0530, Kajol Jain escreveu:
> Patchset enhance current runtime parameter support. It introduces new
> fields like "PerChip" and "PerCore" similar to the field "PerPkg" which is
> used to specify perpkg events.
>
> The "PerCore" and "PerChip" specifies whether its core or chip events.
> Based on which we can decide which runtime parameter user want to
> access. Now character '?' can refers different parameter based on user
> requirement.
>
> Initially, every time we want to add new terms like chip, core, thread
> etc, we need to create corrsponding fields in pmu_events and event
> struct.
> This patchset adds an enum called 'aggr_mode_class' which store all these
> aggregation like perpkg/percore. It also adds new field 'AggregationMode'
> to capture these terms.
> Now, if user wants to add any new term, they just need to add it in
> the enum defined. I try to test it with my current setup.
>
> I also need to replace PerPkg field to AggregationMode in all the
> x86 uncore json files. It will great if Andi and team can test it
> and let me know if they have any concerns.
>
> Changelog:
> v2 -> v3:
> - Did some nits changes suggested by Jiri include correction of
> indentation, and making PerCore/PerChip values forward after
> PerPkg as 1 in the enum.
> - Rebase the patchset on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core branch.
> - Change RFC tag
Hey, have anybody provided Acked-by/Reviewed-by for previous revisions
of this patchset? If so you could have collected them for patches
without changes, was that the case?
- Arnaldo
> v1 -> v2:
> - Rather then adding new field as PerCore/PerChip, created a new enum
> to get these fields. And new field as "AggregationMode" which can
> be used to capture these fields from json file.
> - Suggested By Ian Rogers
>
>
> Kajol Jain (5):
> perf/pmu-events/jevents: Add enum to store aggregation like PerPkg
> pmu-events/x86/uncore: Replace PerPkg field to AggregationMode in x86
> json files
> perf jevents: Add support for parsing perchip/percore events
> perf/tools: Pass pmu_event structure as a parameter for
> arch_get_runtimeparam
> perf/tools/pmu_events/powerpc: Add hv_24x7 core level metric events
>
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c | 7 +-
> .../arch/powerpc/power9/nest_metrics.json | 27 +-
> .../arch/x86/broadwellde/uncore-cache.json | 62 ++--
> .../arch/x86/broadwellde/uncore-memory.json | 18 +-
> .../arch/x86/broadwellde/uncore-power.json | 18 +-
> .../arch/x86/broadwellx/uncore-cache.json | 62 ++--
> .../x86/broadwellx/uncore-interconnect.json | 6 +-
> .../arch/x86/broadwellx/uncore-memory.json | 18 +-
> .../arch/x86/broadwellx/uncore-power.json | 18 +-
> .../arch/x86/cascadelakex/uncore-memory.json | 64 ++--
> .../arch/x86/cascadelakex/uncore-other.json | 332 +++++++++---------
> .../arch/x86/haswellx/uncore-cache.json | 62 ++--
> .../x86/haswellx/uncore-interconnect.json | 6 +-
> .../arch/x86/haswellx/uncore-memory.json | 18 +-
> .../arch/x86/haswellx/uncore-power.json | 18 +-
> .../arch/x86/ivytown/uncore-cache.json | 62 ++--
> .../arch/x86/ivytown/uncore-interconnect.json | 10 +-
> .../arch/x86/ivytown/uncore-memory.json | 16 +-
> .../arch/x86/ivytown/uncore-power.json | 52 +--
> .../arch/x86/jaketown/uncore-cache.json | 40 +--
> .../x86/jaketown/uncore-interconnect.json | 10 +-
> .../arch/x86/jaketown/uncore-memory.json | 18 +-
> .../arch/x86/jaketown/uncore-power.json | 52 +--
> .../x86/knightslanding/uncore-memory.json | 8 +-
> .../arch/x86/skylakex/uncore-memory.json | 36 +-
> .../arch/x86/skylakex/uncore-other.json | 220 ++++++------
> .../arch/x86/tremontx/uncore-memory.json | 14 +-
> .../arch/x86/tremontx/uncore-other.json | 70 ++--
> .../arch/x86/tremontx/uncore-power.json | 2 +-
> tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.c | 45 ++-
> tools/perf/pmu-events/jevents.h | 2 +-
> tools/perf/pmu-events/pmu-events.h | 8 +-
> tools/perf/tests/pmu-events.c | 8 +-
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 5 +-
> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.h | 3 +-
> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 6 +-
> 36 files changed, 729 insertions(+), 694 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-16 9:42 [PATCH v3 0/5] powerpc/perf: Add json file support for hv_24x7 core level events Kajol Jain
2020-07-16 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] perf/pmu-events/jevents: Add enum to store aggregation like PerPkg Kajol Jain
2020-07-17 8:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-07-16 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] pmu-events/x86/uncore: Replace PerPkg field to AggregationMode in x86 json files Kajol Jain
2020-07-16 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] perf jevents: Add support for parsing perchip/percore events Kajol Jain
2020-07-16 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] perf/tools: Pass pmu_event structure as a parameter for arch_get_runtimeparam Kajol Jain
2020-07-16 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] perf/tools/pmu_events/powerpc: Add hv_24x7 core level metric events Kajol Jain
2020-07-16 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-07-17 8:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] powerpc/perf: Add json file support for hv_24x7 core level events kajoljain
2020-07-17 8:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-07-17 22:11 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200716152237.GC373728@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nasastry@in.ibm.com \
--cc=pc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).