[PATCH][next] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix integer overflow on 23 bit left shift of a u32

[PATCH][next] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix integer overflow on 23 bit left shift of a u32

[Colin King]

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The u32 variable pci_dword is being masked with 0x1fffffff and then left
shifted 23 places. The shift is a u32 operation,so a value of 0x200 or
more in pci_dword will overflow the u32 and only the bottow 32 bits
are assigned to addr. I don't believe this was the original intent.
Fix this by casting pci_dword to a resource_size_t to ensure no
overflow occurs.

Note that the mask and 12 bit left shift operation does not need this
because the mask SNR_IMC_MMIO_MEM0_MASK and shift is always a 32 bit
value.

Fixes: ee49532b38dd ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add IMC uncore support for Snow Ridge")
Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 48419dad3b17..7518143850df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -4827,7 +4827,7 @@ static int snr_uncore_mmio_map(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_OFFSET, &pci_dword);
-	addr = (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK) << 23;
+	addr = ((resource_size_t)pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK) << 23;
 
 	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, mem_offset, &pci_dword);
 	addr |= (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_MEM0_MASK) << 12;
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH][next] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix integer overflow on 23 bit left shift of a u32

[Liang, Kan]

On 7/6/2021 7:45 AM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> The u32 variable pci_dword is being masked with 0x1fffffff and then left
> shifted 23 places. The shift is a u32 operation,so a value of 0x200 or
> more in pci_dword will overflow the u32 and only the bottow 32 bits
> are assigned to addr. I don't believe this was the original intent.
> Fix this by casting pci_dword to a resource_size_t to ensure no
> overflow occurs.
> 
> Note that the mask and 12 bit left shift operation does not need this
> because the mask SNR_IMC_MMIO_MEM0_MASK and shift is always a 32 bit
> value.
> 
> Fixes: ee49532b38dd ("perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add IMC uncore support for Snow Ridge")
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")

Thanks for the fix.

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Kan

> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index 48419dad3b17..7518143850df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -4827,7 +4827,7 @@ static int snr_uncore_mmio_map(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
>   		return -ENODEV;
>   
>   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_OFFSET, &pci_dword);
> -	addr = (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK) << 23;
> +	addr = ((resource_size_t)pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_BASE_MASK) << 23;
>   
>   	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, mem_offset, &pci_dword);
>   	addr |= (pci_dword & SNR_IMC_MMIO_MEM0_MASK) << 12;
>