linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V4] PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume order
@ 2018-04-10 23:57 Feng Kan
  2018-04-23  8:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2018-04-30  8:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Feng Kan @ 2018-04-10 23:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rjw, linux-pm, lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci,
	bhelgaas, gregkh
  Cc: Feng Kan, Toan Le

When bridge and its endpoint is enumerated the devices are added to the
dpm list. Afterward, the bridge defers probe when IOMMU is not ready.
This causes the bridge to be moved to the end of the dpm list when
deferred probe kicks in. The order of the dpm list for bridge and
endpoint is reversed.

Add reordering code to move the bridge and its children and consumers to
the end of the pm list so the order for suspend and resume is not altered.
The code also move device and its children and consumers to the tail of
device_kset list if it is registered.

Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
Signed-off-by: Toan Le <toanle@apm.com>
---
 V4:
	1. additional comment change from Rafael
 V3:
	1. additional code comment changes
 V2:
        1. change patch title from "move device and its children..."
        2. move define based on Bjorn's comment
        3. rename function name and comment content

 drivers/base/base.h |  3 +++
 drivers/base/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/base/dd.c   |  4 +---
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
index d800de6..a75c302 100644
--- a/drivers/base/base.h
+++ b/drivers/base/base.h
@@ -161,3 +161,6 @@ static inline void module_remove_driver(struct device_driver *drv) { }
 extern void device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev);
 extern bool device_links_busy(struct device *dev);
 extern void device_links_unbind_consumers(struct device *dev);
+
+/* device pm support */
+void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct device *dev);
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 110230d..eaa5d9f 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -148,6 +148,26 @@ static int device_reorder_to_tail(struct device *dev, void *not_used)
 }
 
 /**
+ * device_pm_move_to_tail - Move set of devices to the end of device lists
+ * @dev: Device to move
+ *
+ * This is a device_reorder_to_tail() wrapper taking the requisite locks.
+ *
+ * It moves the @dev along with all of its children and all of its consumers
+ * to the ends of the device_kset and dpm_list, recursively.
+ */
+void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct device *dev)
+{
+	int idx;
+
+	idx = device_links_read_lock();
+	device_pm_lock();
+	device_reorder_to_tail(dev, NULL);
+	device_pm_unlock();
+	device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+}
+
+/**
  * device_link_add - Create a link between two devices.
  * @consumer: Consumer end of the link.
  * @supplier: Supplier end of the link.
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 2c964f5..96fab29 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -123,9 +123,7 @@ static void deferred_probe_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
 		 * the list is a good order for suspend but deferred
 		 * probe makes that very unsafe.
 		 */
-		device_pm_lock();
-		device_pm_move_last(dev);
-		device_pm_unlock();
+		device_pm_move_to_tail(dev);
 
 		dev_dbg(dev, "Retrying from deferred list\n");
 		if (initcall_debug && !initcalls_done)
-- 
1.8.3.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V4] PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume order
  2018-04-10 23:57 [PATCH V4] PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume order Feng Kan
@ 2018-04-23  8:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  2018-04-23  8:24   ` Greg KH
  2018-04-30  8:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2018-04-23  8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Feng Kan, gregkh
  Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-pm, linux-pci, bhelgaas, Toan Le,
	linux-arm-kernel

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 1:57:06 AM CEST Feng Kan wrote:
> When bridge and its endpoint is enumerated the devices are added to the
> dpm list. Afterward, the bridge defers probe when IOMMU is not ready.
> This causes the bridge to be moved to the end of the dpm list when
> deferred probe kicks in. The order of the dpm list for bridge and
> endpoint is reversed.
> 
> Add reordering code to move the bridge and its children and consumers to
> the end of the pm list so the order for suspend and resume is not altered.
> The code also move device and its children and consumers to the tail of
> device_kset list if it is registered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Toan Le <toanle@apm.com>

I'm going to queue this up for 4.18-rc1.

If anyone, and Greg in particular, has any objections of concerns regarding
that, please let me know.

> ---
>  V4:
> 	1. additional comment change from Rafael
>  V3:
> 	1. additional code comment changes
>  V2:
>         1. change patch title from "move device and its children..."
>         2. move define based on Bjorn's comment
>         3. rename function name and comment content
> 
>  drivers/base/base.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/base/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/base/dd.c   |  4 +---
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
> index d800de6..a75c302 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/base.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/base.h
> @@ -161,3 +161,6 @@ static inline void module_remove_driver(struct device_driver *drv) { }
>  extern void device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev);
>  extern bool device_links_busy(struct device *dev);
>  extern void device_links_unbind_consumers(struct device *dev);
> +
> +/* device pm support */
> +void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 110230d..eaa5d9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,26 @@ static int device_reorder_to_tail(struct device *dev, void *not_used)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * device_pm_move_to_tail - Move set of devices to the end of device lists
> + * @dev: Device to move
> + *
> + * This is a device_reorder_to_tail() wrapper taking the requisite locks.
> + *
> + * It moves the @dev along with all of its children and all of its consumers
> + * to the ends of the device_kset and dpm_list, recursively.
> + */
> +void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	idx = device_links_read_lock();
> +	device_pm_lock();
> +	device_reorder_to_tail(dev, NULL);
> +	device_pm_unlock();
> +	device_links_read_unlock(idx);
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * device_link_add - Create a link between two devices.
>   * @consumer: Consumer end of the link.
>   * @supplier: Supplier end of the link.
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 2c964f5..96fab29 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -123,9 +123,7 @@ static void deferred_probe_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>  		 * the list is a good order for suspend but deferred
>  		 * probe makes that very unsafe.
>  		 */
> -		device_pm_lock();
> -		device_pm_move_last(dev);
> -		device_pm_unlock();
> +		device_pm_move_to_tail(dev);
>  
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "Retrying from deferred list\n");
>  		if (initcall_debug && !initcalls_done)
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V4] PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume order
  2018-04-23  8:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2018-04-23  8:24   ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2018-04-23  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Feng Kan, lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-pm, linux-pci, bhelgaas,
	Toan Le, linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:03:19AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 1:57:06 AM CEST Feng Kan wrote:
> > When bridge and its endpoint is enumerated the devices are added to the
> > dpm list. Afterward, the bridge defers probe when IOMMU is not ready.
> > This causes the bridge to be moved to the end of the dpm list when
> > deferred probe kicks in. The order of the dpm list for bridge and
> > endpoint is reversed.
> > 
> > Add reordering code to move the bridge and its children and consumers to
> > the end of the pm list so the order for suspend and resume is not altered.
> > The code also move device and its children and consumers to the tail of
> > device_kset list if it is registered.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Toan Le <toanle@apm.com>
> 
> I'm going to queue this up for 4.18-rc1.
> 
> If anyone, and Greg in particular, has any objections of concerns regarding
> that, please let me know.

No objection from me:
	Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V4] PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume order
  2018-04-10 23:57 [PATCH V4] PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume order Feng Kan
  2018-04-23  8:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2018-04-30  8:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2018-04-30  8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Feng Kan
  Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-pm, linux-pci, gregkh, bhelgaas,
	Toan Le, linux-arm-kernel

On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 1:57:06 AM CEST Feng Kan wrote:
> When bridge and its endpoint is enumerated the devices are added to the
> dpm list. Afterward, the bridge defers probe when IOMMU is not ready.
> This causes the bridge to be moved to the end of the dpm list when
> deferred probe kicks in. The order of the dpm list for bridge and
> endpoint is reversed.
> 
> Add reordering code to move the bridge and its children and consumers to
> the end of the pm list so the order for suspend and resume is not altered.
> The code also move device and its children and consumers to the tail of
> device_kset list if it is registered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Toan Le <toanle@apm.com>
> ---
>  V4:
> 	1. additional comment change from Rafael
>  V3:
> 	1. additional code comment changes
>  V2:
>         1. change patch title from "move device and its children..."
>         2. move define based on Bjorn's comment
>         3. rename function name and comment content
> 
>  drivers/base/base.h |  3 +++
>  drivers/base/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/base/dd.c   |  4 +---
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/base/base.h b/drivers/base/base.h
> index d800de6..a75c302 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/base.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/base.h
> @@ -161,3 +161,6 @@ static inline void module_remove_driver(struct device_driver *drv) { }
>  extern void device_links_no_driver(struct device *dev);
>  extern bool device_links_busy(struct device *dev);
>  extern void device_links_unbind_consumers(struct device *dev);
> +
> +/* device pm support */
> +void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 110230d..eaa5d9f 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -148,6 +148,26 @@ static int device_reorder_to_tail(struct device *dev, void *not_used)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * device_pm_move_to_tail - Move set of devices to the end of device lists
> + * @dev: Device to move
> + *
> + * This is a device_reorder_to_tail() wrapper taking the requisite locks.
> + *
> + * It moves the @dev along with all of its children and all of its consumers
> + * to the ends of the device_kset and dpm_list, recursively.
> + */
> +void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	idx = device_links_read_lock();
> +	device_pm_lock();
> +	device_reorder_to_tail(dev, NULL);
> +	device_pm_unlock();
> +	device_links_read_unlock(idx);
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * device_link_add - Create a link between two devices.
>   * @consumer: Consumer end of the link.
>   * @supplier: Supplier end of the link.
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index 2c964f5..96fab29 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -123,9 +123,7 @@ static void deferred_probe_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>  		 * the list is a good order for suspend but deferred
>  		 * probe makes that very unsafe.
>  		 */
> -		device_pm_lock();
> -		device_pm_move_last(dev);
> -		device_pm_unlock();
> +		device_pm_move_to_tail(dev);
>  
>  		dev_dbg(dev, "Retrying from deferred list\n");
>  		if (initcall_debug && !initcalls_done)
> 

Queued up for 4.18 with the Greg's ACK.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-30  8:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-10 23:57 [PATCH V4] PM / core: fix deferred probe breaking suspend resume order Feng Kan
2018-04-23  8:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-23  8:24   ` Greg KH
2018-04-30  8:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).