linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de>,
	Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/10] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select()
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 09:24:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1694033.ykrRIB27yN@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180406024413.GB4400@lerouge>

On Friday, April 6, 2018 4:44:14 AM CEST Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:39:50AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -991,6 +991,20 @@ void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void)
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > + * tick_nohz_idle_got_tick - Check whether or not the tick handler has run
> > + */
> > +bool tick_nohz_idle_got_tick(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
> > +
> > +	if (ts->inidle > 1) {
> > +		ts->inidle = 1;
> > +		return true;
> > +	}
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> >   * tick_nohz_get_sleep_length - return the length of the current sleep
> >   *
> >   * Called from power state control code with interrupts disabled
> > @@ -1101,6 +1115,9 @@ static void tick_nohz_handler(struct clo
> >  	struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs();
> >  	ktime_t now = ktime_get();
> >  
> > +	if (ts->inidle)
> > +		ts->inidle = 2;
> > +
> 
> You can move that to tick_sched_do_timer() to avoid code duplication.

Right.

> Also these constants are very opaque. And even with proper symbols it wouldn't look
> right to extend ts->inidle that way.

Well, this was a Peter's idea. :-)

> Perhaps you should add a field such as ts->got_idle_tick under the boolean fields
> after the below patch:

OK, but at this point I'd prefer to make such changes on top of the existing
set, because that's got quite some testing coverage already and honestly this
is cosmetics in my view (albeit important).

> --
> From c7b2ca5a4c512517ddfeb9f922d5999f82542ced Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 04:32:37 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Gather tick_sched booleans under a common flag field
> 
> This optimize the space and leave plenty of room for further flags.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.h | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
> index 954b43d..38f24dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.h
> @@ -45,14 +45,17 @@ struct tick_sched {
>  	struct hrtimer			sched_timer;
>  	unsigned long			check_clocks;
>  	enum tick_nohz_mode		nohz_mode;
> +
> +	unsigned int			inidle		: 1;
> +	unsigned int			tick_stopped	: 1;
> +	unsigned int			idle_active	: 1;
> +	unsigned int			do_timer_last	: 1;
> +
>  	ktime_t				last_tick;
>  	ktime_t				next_tick;
> -	int				inidle;
> -	int				tick_stopped;
>  	unsigned long			idle_jiffies;
>  	unsigned long			idle_calls;
>  	unsigned long			idle_sleeps;
> -	int				idle_active;
>  	ktime_t				idle_entrytime;
>  	ktime_t				idle_waketime;
>  	ktime_t				idle_exittime;
> @@ -62,7 +65,6 @@ struct tick_sched {
>  	unsigned long			last_jiffies;
>  	u64				next_timer;
>  	ktime_t				idle_expires;
> -	int				do_timer_last;
>  	atomic_t			tick_dep_mask;
>  };
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-06  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-04  8:32 [PATCH v9 00/10] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04  8:33 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04  8:34 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04  8:36 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick before cpuidle_idle_call() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04  8:38 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] jiffies: Introduce USER_TICK_USEC and redefine TICK_USEC Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06  1:09   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06  7:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04  8:39 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06  2:44   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06  7:24     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-04-06 14:19       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06  7:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-06 14:23       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06  8:11     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06 12:56       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06 15:28         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06 14:28       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-04  8:41 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] time: tick-sched: Split tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-07  2:36   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-07 16:36     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04  8:45 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] time: hrtimer: Introduce hrtimer_next_event_without() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-07 14:46   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-08  8:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-08 17:58       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-04  8:47 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] sched: idle: Select idle state before stopping the tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-09  2:41   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-04  8:49 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 12:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 13:51     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 12:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 13:52     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04  8:50 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] cpuidle: menu: Avoid selecting shallow states with stopped tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 13:49     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 14:11       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 14:13         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 14:29           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-08 16:32 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-09 15:58   ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-04-10  7:03     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1694033.ykrRIB27yN@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).