From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Ilsche <thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 09/10] cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 15:52:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hHafjXS_erX_mRda_ZNj5LHXVQPthOO2F5zpBDAoQXsA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180405123219.GP4082@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> + data->next_timer_us = ktime_to_us(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(&delta_next));
>> + unsigned int delta_next_us = ktime_to_us(delta_next);
>
> We really should be looking at removing all that us nonsense from the
> idle code, but that'll be another series.
Right.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-05 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-04 8:32 [PATCH v9 00/10] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04 8:33 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] time: tick-sched: Reorganize idle tick management code Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04 8:34 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick upfront in the idle loop Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04 8:36 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] sched: idle: Do not stop the tick before cpuidle_idle_call() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04 8:38 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] jiffies: Introduce USER_TICK_USEC and redefine TICK_USEC Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06 1:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06 7:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04 8:39 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] cpuidle: Return nohz hint from cpuidle_select() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06 2:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06 7:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06 14:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-06 14:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06 8:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06 12:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-06 15:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-06 14:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-04 8:41 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] time: tick-sched: Split tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-07 2:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-07 16:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-04 8:45 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] time: hrtimer: Introduce hrtimer_next_event_without() Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-07 14:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-08 8:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-08 17:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-04 8:47 ` [PATCH v9 08/10] sched: idle: Select idle state before stopping the tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-09 2:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2018-04-04 8:49 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] cpuidle: menu: Refine idle state selection for running tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2018-04-04 8:50 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] cpuidle: menu: Avoid selecting shallow states with stopped tick Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 13:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-05 14:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-05 14:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-08 16:32 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] sched/cpuidle: Idle loop rework Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-04-09 15:58 ` Thomas Ilsche
2018-04-10 7:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0hHafjXS_erX_mRda_ZNj5LHXVQPthOO2F5zpBDAoQXsA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).