Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: Don't report an error for AMD CPUs

Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: Don't report an error for AMD CPUs

[Thomas Gleixner]

Alexander Koskovich <zvnexus@gmail.com> writes:

> Resolves dmesg error "intel_powerclamp: CPU does not support MWAIT".
>
> The error that is outputted in dmesg prior to this patch
> is innacurate, AMD Ryzen CPUs do support MWAIT. We could
> also add the AMD vendor to the MWAIT check, but even though
> AMD CPUs do support MWAIT, they fail the C-state package
> check so it's better just to bail out in the beginning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Koskovich <zvnexus@outlook.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> index 53216dcbe173..3c5b25bfa596 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> @@ -650,6 +650,11 @@ static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
>  	.set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct x86_cpu_id amd_cpu[] = {
> +	{ X86_VENDOR_AMD },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
>  static const struct x86_cpu_id __initconst intel_powerclamp_ids[] = {
>  	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT },
>  	{}
> @@ -659,6 +664,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
>  static int __init powerclamp_probe(void)
>  {
>  
> +	if (x86_match_cpu(amd_cpu)) {
> +		pr_info("Intel PowerClamp does not support AMD CPUs\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;

This is still running into the same problem on all other non Intel
vendors, e.g. HYGON, VIA ....

> +	}
> +
>  	if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_powerclamp_ids)) {
>  		pr_err("CPU does not support MWAIT\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;

The right thing to do is to remove this silly pr_err(). It's not an
error when a CPU does not support MWAIT. It's a fact and even older
Intel CPUs do not have MWAIT.

We do not print "Machine does not have $FEATURE" in device drivers and
whatever code which depends on runtime detection either. dmesg would be
full of this.

Thanks,

        tglx

[PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: Don't report an error for AMD CPUs

[Alexander Koskovich]

Resolves dmesg error "intel_powerclamp: CPU does not support MWAIT".

The error that is outputted in dmesg prior to this patch
is innacurate, AMD Ryzen CPUs do support MWAIT. We could
also add the AMD vendor to the MWAIT check, but even though
AMD CPUs do support MWAIT, they fail the C-state package
check so it's better just to bail out in the beginning.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Koskovich <zvnexus@outlook.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
index 53216dcbe173..3c5b25bfa596 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
@@ -650,6 +650,11 @@ static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
 	.set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,
 };
 
+static const struct x86_cpu_id amd_cpu[] = {
+	{ X86_VENDOR_AMD },
+	{},
+};
+
 static const struct x86_cpu_id __initconst intel_powerclamp_ids[] = {
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT },
 	{}
@@ -659,6 +664,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, intel_powerclamp_ids);
 static int __init powerclamp_probe(void)
 {
 
+	if (x86_match_cpu(amd_cpu)) {
+		pr_info("Intel PowerClamp does not support AMD CPUs\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
 	if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_powerclamp_ids)) {
 		pr_err("CPU does not support MWAIT\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
-- 
2.25.0

Re: [PATCH] thermal/intel_powerclamp: Don't report an error for AMD CPUs

[Zhang Rui]

On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 11:09 -0500, Alexander Koskovich wrote:
> Resolves dmesg error "intel_powerclamp: CPU does not support MWAIT".
> 
> The error that is outputted in dmesg prior to this patch
> is innacurate, AMD Ryzen CPUs do support MWAIT. We could
> also add the AMD vendor to the MWAIT check, but even though
> AMD CPUs do support MWAIT, they fail the C-state package
> check so it's better just to bail out in the beginning.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Koskovich <zvnexus@outlook.com>

I think you're resending the same patch.

As intel_powerclamp_ids already checks for Intel CPUs, so we don't need
the check for AMD CPU, but instead, just remove the following line

"pr_err("CPU does not support MWAIT\n");"

when intel_powerclamp driver fails to probe.

thanks,
rui

> ---
>  drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> index 53216dcbe173..3c5b25bfa596 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_powerclamp.c
> @@ -650,6 +650,11 @@ static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops
> powerclamp_cooling_ops = {
>  	.set_cur_state = powerclamp_set_cur_state,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct x86_cpu_id amd_cpu[] = {
> +	{ X86_VENDOR_AMD },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
>  static const struct x86_cpu_id __initconst intel_powerclamp_ids[] =
> {
>  	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY,
> X86_FEATURE_MWAIT },
>  	{}
> @@ -659,6 +664,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu,
> intel_powerclamp_ids);
>  static int __init powerclamp_probe(void)
>  {
>  
> +	if (x86_match_cpu(amd_cpu)) {
> +		pr_info("Intel PowerClamp does not support AMD
> CPUs\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!x86_match_cpu(intel_powerclamp_ids)) {
>  		pr_err("CPU does not support MWAIT\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;