linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: edubezval@gmail.com, kevin.wangtao@linaro.org,
	leo.yan@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, javi.merino@kernel.org,
	rui.zhang@intel.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 14:21:30 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180411085130.GN7671@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522945005-7165-7-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>

On 05-04-18, 18:16, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The cpu idle cooling driver performs synchronized idle injection across all
> cpus belonging to the same cluster and offers a new method to cool down a SoC.
> 
> Each cluster has its own idle cooling device, each core has its own idle
> injection thread, each idle injection thread uses play_idle to enter idle.  In
> order to reach the deepest idle state, each cooling device has the idle
> injection threads synchronized together.
> 
> It has some similarity with the intel power clamp driver but it is actually
> designed to work on the ARM architecture via the DT with a mathematical proof
> with the power model which comes with the Documentation.
> 
> The idle injection cycle is fixed while the running cycle is variable. That
> allows to have control on the device reactivity for the user experience. At
> the mitigation point the idle threads are unparked, they play idle the
> specified amount of time and they schedule themselves. The last thread sets
> the next idle injection deadline and when the timer expires it wakes up all
> the threads which in turn play idle again. Meanwhile the running cycle is
> changed by set_cur_state.  When the mitigation ends, the threads are parked.
> The algorithm is self adaptive, so there is no need to handle hotplugging.
> 
> If we take an example of the balanced point, we can use the DT for the hi6220.
> 
> The sustainable power for the SoC is 3326mW to mitigate at 75°C. Eight cores
> running at full blast at the maximum OPP consumes 5280mW. The first value is
> given in the DT, the second is calculated from the OPP with the formula:
> 
>    Pdyn = Cdyn x Voltage^2 x Frequency
> 
> As the SoC vendors don't want to share the static leakage values, we assume
> it is zero, so the Prun = Pdyn + Pstatic = Pdyn + 0 = Pdyn.
> 
> In order to reduce the power to 3326mW, we have to apply a ratio to the
> running time.
> 
> ratio = (Prun - Ptarget) / Ptarget = (5280 - 3326) / 3326 = 0,5874
> 
> We know the idle cycle which is fixed, let's assume 10ms. However from this
> duration we have to substract the wake up latency for the cluster idle state.
> In our case, it is 1.5ms. So for a 10ms latency for idle, we are really idle
> 8.5ms.
> 
> As we know the idle duration and the ratio, we can compute the running cycle.
> 
>    running_cycle = 8.5 / 0.5874 = 14.47ms
> 
> So for 8.5ms of idle, we have 14.47ms of running cycle, and that brings the
> SoC to the balanced trip point of 75°C.
> 
> The driver has been tested on the hi6220 and it appears the temperature
> stabilizes at 75°C with an idle injection time of 10ms (8.5ms real) and
> running cycle of 14ms as expected by the theory above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/Kconfig       |  10 +
>  drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 479 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/cpu_cooling.h   |   6 +
>  3 files changed, 495 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> index 5aaae1b..6c34117 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/Kconfig
> @@ -166,6 +166,16 @@ config CPU_FREQ_THERMAL
>  	  This will be useful for platforms using the generic thermal interface
>  	  and not the ACPI interface.
>  
> +config CPU_IDLE_THERMAL
> +       bool "CPU idle cooling strategy"
> +       depends on CPU_IDLE
> +       help
> +	 This implements the generic CPU cooling mechanism through
> +	 idle injection.  This will throttle the CPU by injecting
> +	 fixed idle cycle.  All CPUs belonging to the same cluster
> +	 will enter idle synchronously to reach the deepest idle
> +	 state.
> +
>  endchoice
>  
>  config CLOCK_THERMAL
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> index 5c219dc..1eec8d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c
> @@ -10,18 +10,33 @@
>   *		Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>   *
>   */
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "CPU cooling: " fmt
> +
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/thermal.h>
>  #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/freezer.h>
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/prio.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/rt.h>
> +#include <linux/smpboot.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
>  
> +#include <linux/ratelimit.h>

What part of the code is using this one ?

> +

Why add above 2 blank lines ?

> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +
>  #include <trace/events/thermal.h>
>  
> +#include <uapi/linux/sched/types.h>
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_THERMAL
>  /*
>   * Cooling state <-> CPUFreq frequency
> @@ -928,3 +943,467 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cooling_unregister);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_THERMAL */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_THERMAL
> +/**
> + * struct cpuidle_cooling_device - data for the idle cooling device
> + * @cdev: a pointer to a struct thermal_cooling_device
> + * @cpumask: a cpumask containing the CPU managed by the cooling device
> + * @timer: a hrtimer giving the tempo for the idle injection cycles
> + * @kref: a kernel refcount on this structure
> + * @count: an atomic to keep track of the last task exiting the idle cycle
> + * @idle_cycle: an integer defining the duration of the idle injection
> + * @state: an normalized integer giving the state of the cooling device
> + */
> +struct cpuidle_cooling_device {
> +	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> +	struct cpumask *cpumask;
> +	struct hrtimer timer;
> +	struct kref kref;
> +	atomic_t count;
> +	unsigned int idle_cycle;
> +	unsigned long state;
> +};
> +
> +struct cpuidle_cooling_thread {
> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> +	int should_run;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_cooling_thread, cpuidle_cooling_thread);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuidle_cooling_device *, cpuidle_cooling_device);
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_wakeup - Wake up all idle injection threads
> + * @idle_cdev: the idle cooling device
> + *
> + * Every idle injection task belonging to the idle cooling device and
> + * running on an online cpu will be wake up by this call.
> + */
> +static void cpuidle_cooling_wakeup(struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_thread *cct;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, idle_cdev->cpumask, cpu_online_mask) {
> +		cct = per_cpu_ptr(&cpuidle_cooling_thread, cpu);
> +		cct->should_run = 1;
> +		wake_up_process(cct->tsk);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_wakeup_fn - Running cycle timer callback
> + * @timer: a hrtimer structure
> + *
> + * When the mitigation is acting, the CPU is allowed to run an amount
> + * of time, then the idle injection happens for the specified delay
> + * and the idle task injection schedules itself until the timer event
> + * wakes the idle injection tasks again for a new idle injection
> + * cycle. The time between the end of the idle injection and the timer
> + * expiration is the allocated running time for the CPU.
> + *
> + * Always returns HRTIMER_NORESTART
> + */
> +static enum hrtimer_restart cpuidle_cooling_wakeup_fn(struct hrtimer *timer)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev =
> +		container_of(timer, struct cpuidle_cooling_device, timer);
> +
> +	cpuidle_cooling_wakeup(idle_cdev);
> +
> +	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_runtime - Running time computation
> + * @idle_cdev: the idle cooling device
> + *
> + * The running duration is computed from the idle injection duration
> + * which is fixed. If we reach 100% of idle injection ratio, that
> + * means the running duration is zero. If we have a 50% ratio
> + * injection, that means we have equal duration for idle and for
> + * running duration.
> + *
> + * The formula is deduced as the following:
> + *
> + *  running = idle x ((100 / ratio) - 1)
> + *
> + * For precision purpose for integer math, we use the following:
> + *
> + *  running = (idle x 100) / ratio - idle
> + *
> + * For example, if we have an injected duration of 50%, then we end up
> + * with 10ms of idle injection and 10ms of running duration.
> + *
> + * Returns a s64 nanosecond based
> + */
> +static s64 cpuidle_cooling_runtime(struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev)
> +{
> +	s64 next_wakeup;
> +	unsigned long state = idle_cdev->state;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The function should not be called when there is no
> +	 * mitigation because:
> +	 * - that does not make sense
> +	 * - we end up with a division by zero
> +	 */
> +	if (!state)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	next_wakeup = (s64)((idle_cdev->idle_cycle * 100) / state) -
> +		idle_cdev->idle_cycle;
> +
> +	return next_wakeup * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_injection - Idle injection mainloop thread function
> + * @cpu: an integer giving the cpu number the thread is pinned on
> + *
> + * This main function does basically two operations:
> + *
> + * - Goes idle for a specific amount of time
> + *
> + * - Sets a timer to wake up all the idle injection threads after a
> + *   running period
> + *
> + * That happens only when the mitigation is enabled, otherwise the
> + * task is scheduled out.
> + *
> + * In order to keep the tasks synchronized together, it is the last
> + * task exiting the idle period which is in charge of setting the
> + * timer.
> + *
> + * This function never returns.
> + */
> +static void cpuidle_cooling_injection(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	s64 next_wakeup;
> +
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev =
> +		per_cpu(cpuidle_cooling_device, cpu);
> +
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_thread *cct =
> +		per_cpu_ptr(&cpuidle_cooling_thread, cpu);
> +
> +	atomic_inc(&idle_cdev->count);
> +
> +	cct->should_run = 0;
> +
> +	play_idle(idle_cdev->idle_cycle / USEC_PER_MSEC);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The last CPU waking up is in charge of setting the
> +	 * timer. If the CPU is hotplugged, the timer will
> +	 * move to another CPU (which may not belong to the
> +	 * same cluster) but that is not a problem as the
> +	 * timer will be set again by another CPU belonging to
> +	 * the cluster, so this mechanism is self adaptive and
> +	 * does not require any hotplugging dance.
> +	 */
> +	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&idle_cdev->count))
> +		return;
> +
> +	next_wakeup = cpuidle_cooling_runtime(idle_cdev);
> +	if (next_wakeup)
> +		hrtimer_start(&idle_cdev->timer, ns_to_ktime(next_wakeup),
> +			      HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
> +}
> +
> +static void cpuidle_cooling_setup(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_USER_RT_PRIO/2 };

Doesn't checkpatch report about space requirements around '/' ?

> +
> +	set_freezable();
> +
> +	sched_setscheduler(current, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
> +}
> +
> +static int cpuidle_cooling_should_run(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_thread *cct =
> +		per_cpu_ptr(&cpuidle_cooling_thread, cpu);
> +
> +	return cct->should_run;
> +}
> +
> +static struct smp_hotplug_thread cpuidle_cooling_threads = {
> +	.store                  = &cpuidle_cooling_thread.tsk,
> +	.thread_fn              = cpuidle_cooling_injection,
> +	.thread_comm            = "thermal-idle/%u",
> +	.thread_should_run	= cpuidle_cooling_should_run,
> +	.setup                  = cpuidle_cooling_setup,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_get_max_state - Get the maximum state
> + * @cdev  : the thermal cooling device
> + * @state : a pointer to the state variable to be filled
> + *
> + * The function always gives 100 as the injection ratio is percentile
> + * based for consistency accros different platforms.
> + *
> + * The function can not fail, it always returns zero.
> + */
> +static int cpuidle_cooling_get_max_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> +					 unsigned long *state)

This isn't aligned as rest of the routines in this driver. Try running
checkpatch with --strict option.

> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Depending on the configuration or the hardware, the running
> +	 * cycle and the idle cycle could be different. We want unify
> +	 * that to an 0..100 interval, so the set state interface will
> +	 * be the same whatever the platform is.
> +	 *
> +	 * The state 100% will make the cluster 100% ... idle. A 0%
> +	 * injection ratio means no idle injection at all and 50%
> +	 * means for 10ms of idle injection, we have 10ms of running
> +	 * time.
> +	 */
> +	*state = 100;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_get_cur_state - Get the current cooling state
> + * @cdev: the thermal cooling device
> + * @state: a pointer to the state
> + *
> + * The function just copy the state value from the private thermal
> + * cooling device structure, the mapping is 1 <-> 1.
> + *
> + * The function can not fail, it always returns zero.
> + */
> +static int cpuidle_cooling_get_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> +					 unsigned long *state)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev = cdev->devdata;
> +
> +	*state = idle_cdev->state;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_set_cur_state - Set the current cooling state
> + * @cdev: the thermal cooling device
> + * @state: the target state
> + *
> + * The function checks first if we are initiating the mitigation which
> + * in turn wakes up all the idle injection tasks belonging to the idle
> + * cooling device. In any case, it updates the internal state for the
> + * cooling device.
> + *
> + * The function can not fail, it always returns zero.
> + */
> +static int cpuidle_cooling_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
> +					 unsigned long state)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev = cdev->devdata;
> +	unsigned long current_state = idle_cdev->state;
> +
> +	idle_cdev->state = state;
> +
> +	if (current_state == 0 && state > 0) {
> +		pr_debug("Starting cooling cpus '%*pbl'\n",
> +			 cpumask_pr_args(idle_cdev->cpumask));
> +		cpuidle_cooling_wakeup(idle_cdev);
> +	} else if (current_state > 0 && !state)  {
> +		pr_debug("Stopping cooling cpus '%*pbl'\n",
> +			 cpumask_pr_args(idle_cdev->cpumask));
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_ops - thermal cooling device ops
> + */
> +static struct thermal_cooling_device_ops cpuidle_cooling_ops = {
> +	.get_max_state = cpuidle_cooling_get_max_state,
> +	.get_cur_state = cpuidle_cooling_get_cur_state,
> +	.set_cur_state = cpuidle_cooling_set_cur_state,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_release - Kref based release helper
> + * @kref: a pointer to the kref structure
> + *
> + * This function is automatically called by the kref_put function when
> + * the idle cooling device refcount reaches zero. At this point, we
> + * have the guarantee the structure is no longer in use and we can
> + * safely release all the ressources.
> + */
> +static void __init cpuidle_cooling_release(struct kref *kref)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev =
> +		container_of(kref, struct cpuidle_cooling_device, kref);
> +
> +	if (idle_cdev->cdev)
> +		thermal_cooling_device_unregister(idle_cdev->cdev);
> +
> +	hrtimer_cancel(&idle_cdev->timer);
> +	kfree(idle_cdev);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuilde_cooling_unregister - Idle cooling device exit function
> + *
> + * This function unregisters the cpuidle cooling device and frees the
> + * ressources previously allocated by the init function. This function
> + * is called when the initialization fails.
> + */
> +static void __init cpuidle_cooling_unregister(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		idle_cdev = per_cpu(cpuidle_cooling_device, cpu);
> +		if (idle_cdev)
> +			kref_put(&idle_cdev->kref, cpuidle_cooling_release);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_alloc - Allocate and initialize an idle cooling device
> + * @cpumask: a cpumask containing all the cpus handled by the cooling device
> + * 
> + * The function is called at init time only. It allocates and
> + * initializes the different fields of the cpuidle cooling device
> + *
> + * It returns a pointer to an cpuidle_cooling_device structure on
> + * success, NULL on error.
> + */
> +static struct cpuidle_cooling_device * __init cpuidle_cooling_alloc(
> +	cpumask_t *cpumask)

I would rather break the line after __init .

> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev;
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	idle_cdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*idle_cdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!idle_cdev)
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The idle duration injection. As we don't have yet a way to
> +	 * specify from the DT configuration, let's default to a tick
> +	 * duration.
> +	 */
> +	idle_cdev->idle_cycle = TICK_USEC;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Initialize the timer to wakeup all the idle injection tasks
> +	 */
> +	hrtimer_init(&idle_cdev->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The wakeup function callback which is in charge of waking
> +	 * up all CPUs belonging to the same cluster

Need a full-stop (.) at the end. Please check all comments for this.

> +	 */
> +	idle_cdev->timer.function = cpuidle_cooling_wakeup_fn;
> +
> +	idle_cdev->cpumask = cpumask;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Assign on a per cpu basis belonging to the cluster, the per
> +	 * cpu cpuidle_cooling_device pointer and increment its
> +	 * refcount on it
> +	 */
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask) {
> +		kref_get(&idle_cdev->kref);
> +		per_cpu(cpuidle_cooling_device, cpu) = idle_cdev;
> +	}
> +
> +	return idle_cdev;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cpuidle_cooling_register - Idle cooling device initialization function
> + *
> + * This function is in charge of creating a cooling device per cluster
> + * and register it to thermal framework. For this we rely on the
> + * topology as there is nothing yet describing better the idle state
> + * power domains.
> + *
> + * We create a cpuidle cooling device per cluster. For this reason we
> + * must, for each cluster, allocate and initialize the cooling device
> + * and for each cpu belonging to this cluster, do the initialization
> + * on a cpu basis.
> + *
> + * This approach for creating the cooling device is needed as we don't
> + * have the guarantee the CPU numbering is sequential.

               guarantee that the CPU

> + *
> + * Unfortunately, there is no API to browse from top to bottom the
> + * topology, cluster->cpu, only the usual for_each_possible_cpu loop.
> + * In order to solve that, we use a cpumask to flag the cluster_id we
> + * already processed. The cpumask will always have enough room for all
> + * the cluster because it is based on NR_CPUS and it is not possible
> + * to have more clusters than cpus.
> + *
> + */
> +void __init cpuidle_cooling_register(void)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_cooling_device *idle_cdev = NULL;
> +	struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +	cpumask_var_t cpumask;

maybe call it clustermask ?

> +	char dev_name[THERMAL_NAME_LENGTH];
> +	int ret = -ENOMEM, cpu;
> +	int cluster_id;
> +
> +	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask, GFP_KERNEL))
> +		return;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +
> +		cluster_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
> +		if (cpumask_test_cpu(cluster_id, cpumask))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Allocate the cpuidle cooling device with the list
> +		 * of the cpus belonging to the cluster.
> +		 */
> +		idle_cdev = cpuidle_cooling_alloc(topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
> +		if (!idle_cdev)
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The thermal cooling device name, we use the
> +		 * cluster_id as the numbering index for the idle
> +		 * cooling device.
> +		 */
> +		snprintf(dev_name, sizeof(dev_name), "thermal-idle-%d",
> +			 cluster_id);
> +
> +		np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);

Check if np is valid ?

> +		cdev = thermal_of_cooling_device_register(np, dev_name,
> +							  idle_cdev,
> +							  &cpuidle_cooling_ops);
> +		if (IS_ERR(cdev)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(cdev);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		idle_cdev->cdev = cdev;
> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cluster_id, cpumask);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = smpboot_register_percpu_thread(&cpuidle_cooling_threads);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	pr_info("Created cpuidle cooling device\n");
> +out:
> +	free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		cpuidle_cooling_unregister();
> +		pr_err("Failed to create idle cooling device (%d)\n", ret);
> +	}

Maybe rearrange it a bit:

+	ret = smpboot_register_percpu_thread(&cpuidle_cooling_threads);
+
+out:
+	if (ret) {
+		cpuidle_cooling_unregister();
+		pr_err("Failed to create idle cooling device (%d)\n", ret);
+	} else {
+	        pr_info("Created cpuidle cooling devices\n");
+       }
+
+	free_cpumask_var(cpumask);

??

> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_THERMAL */
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> index c0accc7..af5520d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu_cooling.h
> @@ -120,4 +120,10 @@ void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
>  }
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_THERMAL */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_THERMAL
> +extern void __init cpuidle_cooling_register(void);
> +#else /* CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_THERMAL */
> +static inline void __init cpuidle_cooling_register(void) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_THERMAL */
> +
>  #endif /* __CPU_COOLING_H__ */
> -- 
> 2.7.4

-- 
viresh

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-11  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-05 16:16 [PATCH v3 0/7] CPU cooling device new strategies Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Fixup the header and copyright Daniel Lezcano
     [not found]   ` <20180411061514.GL7671@vireshk-i7>
2018-04-11  8:56     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Add Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Remove pointless field Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] thermal/drivers/Kconfig: Convert the CPU cooling device to a choice Daniel Lezcano
     [not found]   ` <20180411061851.GM7671@vireshk-i7>
2018-04-11  8:58     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Add idle cooling device documentation Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-11  8:51   ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2018-04-11  9:29     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-13 11:23   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-04-13 11:47     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-16  7:37       ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-16  7:44         ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-16  9:34           ` Sudeep Holla
2018-04-16  9:37           ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-16  9:45             ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-16  9:50               ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-16 10:03                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-16 10:10                   ` Viresh Kumar
2018-04-16 12:10                     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-16 12:30                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-04-16 13:57                         ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-16 14:22                           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-04-17  7:17                             ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-17 10:24                               ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-04-16 12:31                       ` Sudeep Holla
2018-04-16 12:49                         ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-16 13:03                           ` Sudeep Holla
2018-04-16 12:29                 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-04-13 11:38   ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-13 11:46     ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-08-05  5:11   ` Martin Kepplinger
2019-08-05  6:53     ` Martin Kepplinger
2019-08-05  7:39       ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-08-05  7:42         ` Martin Kepplinger
2019-08-05  7:58           ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-10-25 11:22             ` Martin Kepplinger
2019-10-25 14:45               ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-10-26 18:23                 ` Martin Kepplinger
2019-10-28 15:16                   ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-08-05  7:37     ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-08-05  7:40       ` Martin Kepplinger
2018-04-05 16:16 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] cpuidle/drivers/cpuidle-arm: Register the cooling device Daniel Lezcano
2018-04-11  8:51   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180411085130.GN7671@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
    --cc=kevin.wangtao@linaro.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).