Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
	Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 08:03:32 -0700
Message-ID: <20190622150332.GM657710@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190621084217.8167-13-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>

Hello,

Generally looks good to me.  Some nitpicks.

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 09:42:13AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> @@ -951,6 +951,12 @@ controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
>  normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
>  realtime scheduling policy.
>  
> +Cycles distribution is based, by default, on a temporal base and it
> +does not account for the frequency at which tasks are executed.
> +The (optional) utilization clamping support allows to enforce a minimum
> +bandwidth, which should always be provided by a CPU, and a maximum bandwidth,
> +which should never be exceeded by a CPU.

I kinda wonder whether the term bandwidth is a bit confusing because
it's also used for cpu.max/min.  Would just calling it frequency be
clearer?

> +static ssize_t cpu_uclamp_min_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> +				    char *buf, size_t nbytes,
> +				    loff_t off)
> +{
> +	struct task_group *tg;
> +	u64 min_value;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = uclamp_scale_from_percent(buf, &min_value);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	if (min_value > SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE)
> +		return -ERANGE;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +
> +	tg = css_tg(of_css(of));
> +	if (tg == &root_task_group) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}

I don't think you need the above check.

> +	if (tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MIN].value == min_value)
> +		goto out;
> +	if (tg->uclamp_req[UCLAMP_MAX].value < min_value) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;

So, uclamp.max limits the maximum freq% can get and uclamp.min limits
hte maximum freq% protection can get in the subtree.  Let's say
uclamp.max is 50% and uclamp.min is 100%.  It means that protection is
not limited but the actual freq% is limited upto 50%, which isn't
necessarily invalid.  For a simple example, a user might be saying
that they want to get whatever protection they can get from its parent
but wanna limit eventual freq at 50% and it isn't too difficult to
imagine cases where the two knobs are configured separately especially
configuration is being managed hierarchically / automatically.

tl;dr is that we don't need the above restriction and shouldn't
generally be restricting configurations when they don't need to.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply index

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-21  8:42 [PATCH v10 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 01/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 02/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add bucket local max tracking Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 03/16] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 05/16] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current policy Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 06/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Reset uclamp values on RESET_ON_FORK Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 08/16] sched/core: uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 09/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and " Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with() Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 11/16] sched/fair: uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute() Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21 14:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-21 14:47     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-22 15:03   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2019-06-24 17:29     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-24 17:52       ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-25  9:31         ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 13/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate parent clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-22 15:07   ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-24 17:34     ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-24 17:46       ` Tejun Heo
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 14/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 15/16] sched/core: uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21  8:42 ` [PATCH v10 16/16] sched/core: uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes Patrick Bellasi
2019-06-21 14:55 ` [PATCH v10 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190622150332.GM657710@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=balsini@android.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=joelaf@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=smuckle@google.com \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tkjos@google.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-PM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/0 linux-pm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-pm linux-pm/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm \
		linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-pm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-pm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git