linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v6] cpufreq/pasemi: fix an use-after-free in pas_cpufreq_cpu_init()
@ 2019-07-12  2:44 Wen Yang
  2019-07-12  3:44 ` Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wen Yang @ 2019-07-12  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rjw
  Cc: viresh.kumar, linuxppc-dev, linux-pm, linux-kernel, xue.zhihong,
	wang.yi59, cheng.shengyu, Wen Yang, Michael Ellerman

The cpu variable is still being used in the of_get_property() call
after the of_node_put() call, which may result in use-after-free.

Fixes: a9acc26b75f6 ("cpufreq/pasemi: fix possible object reference leak")
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
v6: keep the blank line and fix warning: label 'out_unmap_sdcpwr' defined but not used.
v5: put together the code to get, use, and release cpu device_node.
v4: restore the blank line.
v3: fix a leaked reference.
v2: clean up the code according to the advice of viresh.

 drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
index 6b1e4ab..7d557f9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
@@ -131,10 +131,18 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	int err = -ENODEV;
 
 	cpu = of_get_cpu_node(policy->cpu, NULL);
+	if (!cpu)
+		goto out;
 
+	max_freqp = of_get_property(cpu, "clock-frequency", NULL);
 	of_node_put(cpu);
-	if (!cpu)
+	if (!max_freqp) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
 		goto out;
+	}
+
+	/* we need the freq in kHz */
+	max_freq = *max_freqp / 1000;
 
 	dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "1682m-sdc");
 	if (!dn)
@@ -171,16 +179,6 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	}
 
 	pr_debug("init cpufreq on CPU %d\n", policy->cpu);
-
-	max_freqp = of_get_property(cpu, "clock-frequency", NULL);
-	if (!max_freqp) {
-		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto out_unmap_sdcpwr;
-	}
-
-	/* we need the freq in kHz */
-	max_freq = *max_freqp / 1000;
-
 	pr_debug("max clock-frequency is at %u kHz\n", max_freq);
 	pr_debug("initializing frequency table\n");
 
@@ -196,7 +194,11 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	policy->cur = pas_freqs[cur_astate].frequency;
 	ppc_proc_freq = policy->cur * 1000ul;
 
-	return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, pas_freqs, get_gizmo_latency());
+	err = cpufreq_generic_init(policy, pas_freqs, get_gizmo_latency());
+	if (err)
+		goto out_unmap_sdcpwr;
+
+	return 0;
 
 out_unmap_sdcpwr:
 	iounmap(sdcpwr_mapbase);
-- 
2.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6] cpufreq/pasemi: fix an use-after-free in pas_cpufreq_cpu_init()
  2019-07-12  2:44 [PATCH v6] cpufreq/pasemi: fix an use-after-free in pas_cpufreq_cpu_init() Wen Yang
@ 2019-07-12  3:44 ` Viresh Kumar
       [not found]   ` <201907161626465333445@zte.com.cn>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-07-12  3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wen Yang
  Cc: rjw, linuxppc-dev, linux-pm, linux-kernel, xue.zhihong,
	wang.yi59, cheng.shengyu, Michael Ellerman

On 12-07-19, 10:44, Wen Yang wrote:
> The cpu variable is still being used in the of_get_property() call
> after the of_node_put() call, which may result in use-after-free.
> 
> Fixes: a9acc26b75f6 ("cpufreq/pasemi: fix possible object reference leak")
> Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> v6: keep the blank line and fix warning: label 'out_unmap_sdcpwr' defined but not used.
> v5: put together the code to get, use, and release cpu device_node.
> v4: restore the blank line.
> v3: fix a leaked reference.
> v2: clean up the code according to the advice of viresh.
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
> index 6b1e4ab..7d557f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pasemi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -131,10 +131,18 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	int err = -ENODEV;
>  
>  	cpu = of_get_cpu_node(policy->cpu, NULL);
> +	if (!cpu)
> +		goto out;
>  
> +	max_freqp = of_get_property(cpu, "clock-frequency", NULL);
>  	of_node_put(cpu);
> -	if (!cpu)
> +	if (!max_freqp) {
> +		err = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* we need the freq in kHz */
> +	max_freq = *max_freqp / 1000;
>  
>  	dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "1682m-sdc");
>  	if (!dn)
> @@ -171,16 +179,6 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	}
>  
>  	pr_debug("init cpufreq on CPU %d\n", policy->cpu);
> -
> -	max_freqp = of_get_property(cpu, "clock-frequency", NULL);
> -	if (!max_freqp) {
> -		err = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out_unmap_sdcpwr;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* we need the freq in kHz */
> -	max_freq = *max_freqp / 1000;
> -
>  	pr_debug("max clock-frequency is at %u kHz\n", max_freq);
>  	pr_debug("initializing frequency table\n");
>  
> @@ -196,7 +194,11 @@ static int pas_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  	policy->cur = pas_freqs[cur_astate].frequency;
>  	ppc_proc_freq = policy->cur * 1000ul;
>  
> -	return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, pas_freqs, get_gizmo_latency());
> +	err = cpufreq_generic_init(policy, pas_freqs, get_gizmo_latency());

So you are trying to fix an earlier issue here with this. Should have
been a separate patch. Over that I have just sent a patch now to make
this routine return void.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ee8cf5fb4b4a01fdf9199037ff6d835b935cfd13.1562902877.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/

So all you need to do is to remove the label out_unmap_sdcpwr instead.

> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_unmap_sdcpwr;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  
>  out_unmap_sdcpwr:
>  	iounmap(sdcpwr_mapbase);
> -- 
> 2.9.5

-- 
viresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6] cpufreq/pasemi: fix an use-after-free inpas_cpufreq_cpu_init()
       [not found]   ` <201907161626465333445@zte.com.cn>
@ 2019-07-16  9:00     ` Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-07-16  9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wen.yang99
  Cc: rjw, linuxppc-dev, linux-pm, linux-kernel, xue.zhihong,
	wang.yi59, cheng.shengyu, mpe

On 16-07-19, 16:26, wen.yang99@zte.com.cn wrote:
> Okay thank you.
> Now this patch
> (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ee8cf5fb4b4a01fdf9199037ff6d835b935cfd13.1562902877.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/) 
> seems to have not been merged into the linux-next.
> 
> In order to avoid code conflicts, we will wait until this patch is merged in and then send v7.

Please rebase on PM tree's linux-next branch instead and resend your
patch.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git

-- 
viresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-07-16  9:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-12  2:44 [PATCH v6] cpufreq/pasemi: fix an use-after-free in pas_cpufreq_cpu_init() Wen Yang
2019-07-12  3:44 ` Viresh Kumar
     [not found]   ` <201907161626465333445@zte.com.cn>
2019-07-16  9:00     ` [PATCH v6] cpufreq/pasemi: fix an use-after-free inpas_cpufreq_cpu_init() Viresh Kumar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).