From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: Fix some formatting and misspelling issues
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:16:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715094620.jxh3wwhvchpuhj5o@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715082634.3024816-5-lee.jones@linaro.org>
On 15-07-20, 09:26, Lee Jones wrote:
> Kerneldoc format for attribute descriptions should be '@.*: '.
>
> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
>
> drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c:49: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct sti_cpufreq_ddata '
>
> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
> Cc: Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c
> index 8f16bbb164b84..a5ad96d29adca 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ enum {
> };
>
> /**
> - * ST CPUFreq Driver Data
> + * struct sti_cpufreq_ddata - ST CPUFreq Driver Data
> *
> - * @cpu_node CPU's OF node
> - * @syscfg_eng Engineering Syscon register map
> - * @regmap Syscon register map
> + * @cpu: CPU's OF node
> + * @syscfg_eng: Engineering Syscon register map
> + * @syscfg: Syscon register map
> */
> static struct sti_cpufreq_ddata {
> struct device *cpu;
I already applied the one from V1 earlier this morning.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-15 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-15 8:26 [PATCH v2 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] cpufreq: freq_table: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard comment blocks Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] cpufreq: cpufreq: Demote lots of function headers unworthy of kerneldoc status Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] cpufreq: cpufreq_governor: Demote store_sampling_rate() header to standard comment block Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: Fix some formatting and misspelling issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15 9:46 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] cpufreq: pasemi: Include header file for {check,restore}_astate prototypes Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used in call-backs should be static Lee Jones
2020-07-15 9:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15 10:13 ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Fix a bunch of kerneldoc related issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Mark 'dummy' variable as __always_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Mark sometimes used ID structs as __maybe_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Mark 'hi' and 'lo' dummy variables as __always_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-22 12:50 ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: Mark sometimes used ID structs as __maybe_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Supply struct attribute description for get_aperf_mperf_shift() Lee Jones
2020-07-15 8:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] cpufreq: amd_freq_sensitivity: Mark sometimes used ID structs as __maybe_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15 13:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200715094620.jxh3wwhvchpuhj5o@vireshk-i7 \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=ajitpal.singh@st.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).