linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:16:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200715094633.s2xyn4wetafphpdt@vireshk-i7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200715082634.3024816-1-lee.jones@linaro.org>

On 15-07-20, 09:26, Lee Jones wrote:
> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> niggly little warnings.
> 
> After these patches are applied, the build system no longer
> complains about any W=0 nor W=1 level warnings in drivers/cpufreq.
> 
> Hurrah!
> 
> Changelog
> 
> v1 => v2:
>  - Collect *-bys
>  - Use __maybe_unused instead of removing device IDs
>  - Use __always_unused instead of using unused variables
>  - Include architecture header instead of creating new include file

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15  8:26 [PATCH v2 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] cpufreq: freq_table: Demote obvious misuse of kerneldoc to standard comment blocks Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] cpufreq: cpufreq: Demote lots of function headers unworthy of kerneldoc status Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] cpufreq: cpufreq_governor: Demote store_sampling_rate() header to standard comment block Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] cpufreq: sti-cpufreq: Fix some formatting and misspelling issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15  9:46   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] cpufreq: pasemi: Include header file for {check,restore}_astate prototypes Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used in call-backs should be static Lee Jones
2020-07-15  9:45   ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-15 10:13     ` Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Fix a bunch of kerneldoc related issues Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Mark 'dummy' variable as __always_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Mark sometimes used ID structs as __maybe_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] cpufreq: powernow-k8: Mark 'hi' and 'lo' dummy variables as __always_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-22 12:50   ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] cpufreq: pcc-cpufreq: Mark sometimes used ID structs as __maybe_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Supply struct attribute description for get_aperf_mperf_shift() Lee Jones
2020-07-15  8:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] cpufreq: amd_freq_sensitivity: Mark sometimes used ID structs as __maybe_unused Lee Jones
2020-07-15  9:46 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2020-07-15 13:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] Rid W=1 warnings in CPUFreq Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200715094633.s2xyn4wetafphpdt@vireshk-i7 \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).