From: navneet kumar <navneetk@nvidia.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: rui.zhang@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] thermal: of: notify sensor driver on trip updates
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 12:45:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <547CD380.3030707@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141127143236.GD3342@developer>
Hi Eduardo,
On 11/27/2014 06:32 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> Hello Navneet,
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:16:29PM -0800, Navneet Kumar wrote:
>> From: navneet kumar <navneetk@nvidia.com>
>>
>> some thermal sensor hardwares include logic which
>> can raise interrupts at certain programmed temperature
>> thresholds.
>>
>> Drivers for such sensors should be able to learn the
>> appropriate threshold temperatures for interrupts by querying
>> the thermal framework.
>>
>> This change provides a mechanism to allow a sensor driver to
>> update it's thresholds when userspace changes a trip point
>> temperature.
>>
>> While this behavior may not make sense in thermal zones
>> with more than one sensor, no such examples exist in
>> the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: navneet kumar <navneetk@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 7 +++++++
>> include/linux/thermal.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
>> index 3d47a0cf3825..3568e4a586dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
>> @@ -258,6 +258,9 @@ static int of_thermal_set_trip_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip,
>> /* thermal framework should take care of data->mask & (1 << trip) */
>> data->trips[trip].temperature = temp;
>>
>> + if (data->sops.trip_update)
>> + data->sops.trip_update(data->sensor_data, trip);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -285,6 +288,9 @@ static int of_thermal_set_trip_hyst(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip,
>> /* thermal framework should take care of data->mask & (1 << trip) */
>> data->trips[trip].hysteresis = hyst;
>>
>> + if (data->sops.trip_update)
>> + data->sops.trip_update(data->sensor_data, trip);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -500,6 +506,7 @@ void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct device *dev,
>>
>> tz->sops.get_temp = NULL;
>> tz->sops.get_trend = NULL;
>> + tz->sops.trip_update = NULL;
>> tz->sensor_data = NULL;
>> mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock);
>> }
>> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> index 58341c56a01f..b93e65815175 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
>> @@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ struct thermal_genl_event {
>> struct thermal_of_sensor_ops {
>> int (*get_temp)(void *, long *);
>> int (*get_trend)(void *, long *);
>> + int (*trip_update)(void *, int);
>
> First thing I ask you is to update your work on top of my -linus branch,
> as I already mentioned. Reasoning is that part of the changes you are
> sending is already there.
will do.
>
> As for this new callback, I am fine with it as long as it is also
> available for drivers that do not use of-thermal. Once again, of-thermal
> is not a competitor of thermal core. It will never be. It is not a new
> thermal API.
I agree that this callback is not a part of the thermal_core functionality.
However, when a driver registers directly with the thermal_core (doesn't use
of-thermal), it 'owns' the set_trip_XX callbacks in the first place; which is
the sole purpose of using the 'trip_update' callback in of-thermal.
Adding an additional 'update' to the thermal_core ops would be a no-op. right?
>
> That said, it does not make sense to have functionality in of-thermal that
> do not belong to thermal core. Exceptions are, of course, for helping
> doing the same operations we already have in thermal core.
>
> All the best,
>
> Eduardo Valentin
>
>> };
>>
>> /* Function declarations */
>> --
>> 1.8.1.5
>>
>
> * Unknown Key
> * 0x7DA4E256
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-01 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 1:16 [PATCH 1/3] thermal: of: support writable trips via dt Navneet Kumar
2014-11-27 1:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] thermal: of: consolidate sensor callbacks as ops Navneet Kumar
2014-11-27 14:28 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-12-01 19:29 ` navneet kumar
2014-11-27 1:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] thermal: of: notify sensor driver on trip updates Navneet Kumar
2014-11-27 14:32 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-12-01 20:45 ` navneet kumar [this message]
2014-12-01 21:23 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-12-01 22:35 ` navneet kumar
2014-11-27 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] thermal: of: support writable trips via dt Eduardo Valentin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=547CD380.3030707@nvidia.com \
--to=navneetk@nvidia.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).