From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Qais.Yousef@arm.com, mka@chromium.org, juri.lelli@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/5] PM / QOS: Pass request type to dev_pm_qos_read_value()
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 01:14:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6646229.IQO0cWAbFE@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b414d788faf4c6f87d01086248db4d2e86635180.1560163748.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Monday, June 10, 2019 12:51:33 PM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> In order to use dev_pm_qos_read_value(), and other internal routines to
> it, to read values for different QoS requests, pass request type as a
> parameter to these routines.
>
> For now, it only supports resume-latency request type.
I don't quite like the structure by which the type arg is passed through the
entire call chain until the switch in dep_pm_qos_raw_read_value().
There is only one direct user of dev_pm_qos_raw_read_value() AFAICS which
is cpuidle. It shouldn't need to suffer the general case overhead, so I would
rename that function to dev_pm_qos_raw_resume_latency() and update cpuidle
accordingly.
Moreover, the callers of __dev_pm_qos_read_value() are interested in the
resume latency value too, so it might make sense to rename this as
__dev_pm_qos_resume_latency(), update its callers and put the switch
into dev_pm_qos_read_value().
Plus the changelog should explain the broader rationale of this change like
for the first patch IMO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-10 10:51 [PATCH V3 0/5] cpufreq: Use QoS layer to manage freq-constraints Viresh Kumar
2019-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] PM / QOS: Pass request type to dev_pm_qos_{add|remove}_notifier() Viresh Kumar
2019-06-11 23:45 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-06-17 9:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-06-17 22:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] PM / QOS: Pass request type to dev_pm_qos_read_value() Viresh Kumar
2019-06-12 0:08 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-06-17 9:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-06-17 23:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] PM / QoS: Add support for MIN/MAX frequency constraints Viresh Kumar
2019-06-13 0:04 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-06-17 9:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] cpufreq: Register notifiers with the PM QoS framework Viresh Kumar
2019-06-14 16:46 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-06-17 3:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-17 9:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-06-17 23:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-18 11:25 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-18 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-19 6:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-19 9:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-17 23:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-18 11:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-10 10:51 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] cpufreq: Add QoS requests for userspace constraints Viresh Kumar
2019-06-14 17:14 ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2019-06-17 3:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-17 9:23 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6646229.IQO0cWAbFE@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=Qais.Yousef@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).