Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf' value in cppc_perf_caps struct

[Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>]

Hi everyone:

I want to know why my patch didn't merge into upstream ?


Thanks

在 2020/7/1 下午12:20, Xin Hao 写道:
>   The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get
>   'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use
>   'caps->highest_perf' instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>   drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
>   		if (!max_khz)
>   			max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
>   		mul = max_khz;
> -		div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
> +		div = caps->highest_perf;
>   	}
>   	return (u64)perf * mul / div;
>   }
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
>   	} else {
>   		if (!max_khz)
>   			max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
> -		mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
> +		mul = caps->highest_perf;
>   		div = max_khz;
>   	}
>