linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Use _set_opp_level() for single genpd case
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:52:00 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f709e9e273004be43efe3a2854a7e7b51a777f99.1697710527.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1697710527.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

There are two genpd (as required-opp) cases that we need to handle,
devices with a single genpd and ones with multiple genpds.

The multiple genpds case is clear, where the OPP core calls
dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() for them and uses the virtual devices
returned by this helper to call dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state()
later to change the performance state.

The single genpd case however requires special handling as we need to
use the same `dev` structure (instead of a virtual one provided by genpd
core) for setting the performance state via
dev_pm_domain_set_performance_state().

As we move towards more generic code to take care of the required OPPs,
where we will recursively call dev_pm_opp_set_opp() for all the required
OPPs, the above special case becomes a problem.

Eventually we want to handle all performance state changes via
_set_opp_level(), so lets move the single genpd case to that right away.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/opp/core.c |  6 ++++--
 drivers/opp/of.c   | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index 84f345c69ea5..aab8c8e79146 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1074,10 +1074,12 @@ static int _opp_set_required_opps_generic(struct device *dev,
 static int _opp_set_required_opps_genpd(struct device *dev,
 	struct opp_table *opp_table, struct dev_pm_opp *opp, bool scaling_down)
 {
-	struct device **genpd_virt_devs =
-		opp_table->genpd_virt_devs ? opp_table->genpd_virt_devs : &dev;
+	struct device **genpd_virt_devs = opp_table->genpd_virt_devs;
 	int index, target, delta, ret;
 
+	if (!genpd_virt_devs)
+		return 0;
+
 	/* Scaling up? Set required OPPs in normal order, else reverse */
 	if (!scaling_down) {
 		index = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/opp/of.c b/drivers/opp/of.c
index 81fa27599d58..e056f31a48b5 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/of.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/of.c
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ void _of_clear_opp(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
 	of_node_put(opp->np);
 }
 
-static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
+static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct opp_table *opp_table,
 			       struct opp_table *required_table, int index)
 {
 	struct device_node *np;
@@ -314,6 +314,25 @@ static int _link_required_opps(struct dev_pm_opp *opp,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * There are two genpd (as required-opp) cases that we need to handle,
+	 * devices with a single genpd and ones with multiple genpds.
+	 *
+	 * The single genpd case requires special handling as we need to use the
+	 * same `dev` structure (instead of a virtual one provided by genpd
+	 * core) for setting the performance state. Lets treat this as a case
+	 * where the OPP's level is directly available without required genpd
+	 * link in the DT.
+	 *
+	 * Just update the `level` with the right value, which
+	 * dev_pm_opp_set_opp() will take care of in the normal path itself.
+	 */
+	if (required_table->is_genpd && opp_table->required_opp_count == 1 &&
+	    !opp_table->genpd_virt_devs) {
+		if (!WARN_ON(opp->level))
+			opp->level = opp->required_opps[0]->level;
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -338,7 +357,7 @@ static int _of_opp_alloc_required_opps(struct opp_table *opp_table,
 		if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(required_table))
 			continue;
 
-		ret = _link_required_opps(opp, required_table, i);
+		ret = _link_required_opps(opp, opp_table, required_table, i);
 		if (ret)
 			goto free_required_opps;
 	}
@@ -359,7 +378,7 @@ static int lazy_link_required_opps(struct opp_table *opp_table,
 	int ret;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(opp, &opp_table->opp_list, node) {
-		ret = _link_required_opps(opp, new_table, index);
+		ret = _link_required_opps(opp, opp_table, new_table, index);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.31.1.272.g89b43f80a514


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-19 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-19 10:21 [RFT PATCH 0/2] OPP: Simplify required-opp handling Viresh Kumar
2023-10-19 10:22 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2023-10-19 11:16   ` [PATCH 1/2] OPP: Use _set_opp_level() for single genpd case Ulf Hansson
2023-10-20  3:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-20 10:02       ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-20 10:56         ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-20 11:09           ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-25  6:54     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 10:40       ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-25 10:48         ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 13:47         ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-25 15:24           ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 16:16             ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-26  9:53           ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-30 10:29             ` Viresh Kumar
2023-11-03 11:58               ` Ulf Hansson
2023-11-06  7:08                 ` Viresh Kumar
2023-11-10 13:50                   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-11-15  5:32                     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-11-16 10:44                       ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-19 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] OPP: Call dev_pm_opp_set_opp() for required OPPs Viresh Kumar
2023-10-24 11:18   ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-25  7:36     ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 12:17       ` Stephan Gerhold
2023-10-25 15:20         ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 16:03           ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-26  7:44             ` Viresh Kumar
2023-10-25 13:51   ` Ulf Hansson
2023-10-25 15:09     ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f709e9e273004be43efe3a2854a7e7b51a777f99.1697710527.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=stephan.gerhold@kernkonzept.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).