[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 04/43] pwm: spear: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 04/43] pwm: spear: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit b601a18f12383001e7a8da238de7ca1559ebc450 ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
index f63b54aae1b4..7467e03d2fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-spear.c
@@ -229,10 +229,6 @@ static int spear_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int spear_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct spear_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++)
-		pwm_disable(&pc->chip.pwms[i]);
 
 	/* clk was prepared in probe, hence unprepare it here */
 	clk_unprepare(pc->clk);
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 33/43] pwm: img: Fix PM reference leak in img_pwm_enable()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit fde25294dfd8e36e4e30b693c27a86232864002a ]

pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed.
Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here.
Fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
counter balanced.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
index 6faf5b5a5584..37200850cdc6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int img_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
 	struct img_pwm_chip *pwm_chip = to_img_pwm_chip(chip);
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(chip->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(chip->dev);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
-- 
2.30.2

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 34/43] pwm: tegra: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback

[Sasha Levin]

From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 86f7fa71cd830d18d7ebcaf719dffd5ddfe1acdd ]

A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.

So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c | 13 -------------
 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
index 55bc63d5a0ae..6d8e324864fa 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c
@@ -301,7 +301,6 @@ static int tegra_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static int tegra_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct tegra_pwm_chip *pc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	unsigned int i;
 	int err;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!pc))
@@ -311,18 +310,6 @@ static int tegra_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < pc->chip.npwm; i++) {
-		struct pwm_device *pwm = &pc->chip.pwms[i];
-
-		if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
-			if (clk_prepare_enable(pc->clk) < 0)
-				continue;
-
-		pwm_writel(pc, i, 0);
-
-		clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
-	}
-
 	reset_control_assert(pc->rst);
 	clk_disable_unprepare(pc->clk);
 
-- 
2.30.2