* [PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: Using conf->max_degraded rather than 2 to determine whether there is excess compute-disks for raid4/5/6.
@ 2012-10-27 2:28 majianpeng
2012-10-28 21:45 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: majianpeng @ 2012-10-27 2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: NeilBrown; +Cc: linux-raid
In func analyse_stripe, about judging how many want-computer disks,it
used 2.But for raid4/5, it is at most is one.So using conf->max_degraded
to replace.
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 684ca76..930dee0 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -3285,7 +3285,7 @@ static void analyse_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
s->uptodate++;
if (test_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags)) {
s->compute++;
- BUG_ON(s->compute > 2);
+ BUG_ON(s->compute > conf->max_degraded);
}
if (test_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags))
--
1.7.9.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: Using conf->max_degraded rather than 2 to determine whether there is excess compute-disks for raid4/5/6.
2012-10-27 2:28 [PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: Using conf->max_degraded rather than 2 to determine whether there is excess compute-disks for raid4/5/6 majianpeng
@ 2012-10-28 21:45 ` NeilBrown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: NeilBrown @ 2012-10-28 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: majianpeng; +Cc: linux-raid
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 988 bytes --]
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:28:25 +0800 majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com> wrote:
> In func analyse_stripe, about judging how many want-computer disks,it
> used 2.But for raid4/5, it is at most is one.So using conf->max_degraded
> to replace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 684ca76..930dee0 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -3285,7 +3285,7 @@ static void analyse_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh, struct stripe_head_state *s)
> s->uptodate++;
> if (test_bit(R5_Wantcompute, &dev->flags)) {
> s->compute++;
> - BUG_ON(s->compute > 2);
> + BUG_ON(s->compute > conf->max_degraded);
> }
>
> if (test_bit(R5_Wantfill, &dev->flags))
If I were to bother changing that code at all, I'd just remove the BUG_ON.
But I won't bother.
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-28 21:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-27 2:28 [PATCH 5/5] md/raid5: Using conf->max_degraded rather than 2 to determine whether there is excess compute-disks for raid4/5/6 majianpeng
2012-10-28 21:45 ` NeilBrown
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).