* [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
@ 2020-10-28 6:04 Xiao Ni
2020-10-28 12:29 ` heming.zhao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Ni @ 2020-10-28 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jes; +Cc: heming.zhao, ncroxon, heinzm, linux-raid
Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
---
super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
{
- unsigned long long offset;
+ unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
+ bitmap_super_t *bms;
int mustfree = 0;
int ret;
@@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
ret = 0;
else
ret = -1;
- offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
- offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
+
+ offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
+ if (node_num) {
+ bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
+ bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
+ offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
+ }
if (mustfree)
free(sb);
lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
--
2.7.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
2020-10-28 6:04 [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly Xiao Ni
@ 2020-10-28 12:29 ` heming.zhao
2020-10-30 5:53 ` Xiao Ni
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: heming.zhao @ 2020-10-28 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiao Ni, jes; +Cc: ncroxon, heinzm, linux-raid
Hello Xiao,
My review comment:
You code only work in modern system. the boundary is 4k not 512, because using hardcode 4k to call calc_bitmap_size
In current cluster env, if bitmap area beyond 4K size (or 512 in very old system), locate_bitmap1
will return wrong address.
Please refer write_bitmap1() to saparate 512 & 4096 case.
On 10/28/20 2:04 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
> Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
> add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> ---
> super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
> index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
> --- a/super1.c
> +++ b/super1.c
> @@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
>
> static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
> {
> - unsigned long long offset;
> + unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
> struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
> + bitmap_super_t *bms;
> int mustfree = 0;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
> ret = 0;
> else
> ret = -1;
> - offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
> - offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
> +
> + offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
> + if (node_num) {
> + bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
> + bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
> + offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
> + }
> if (mustfree)
> free(sb);
> lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
2020-10-28 12:29 ` heming.zhao
@ 2020-10-30 5:53 ` Xiao Ni
2020-10-30 6:44 ` heming.zhao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Ni @ 2020-10-30 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heming.zhao, jes; +Cc: ncroxon, heinzm, linux-raid
Hi Heming
The cluster raid is only supported by super 1.2, so we don't need to
consider the old system when
it's a cluster raid.
Regards
Xiao
On 10/28/2020 08:29 PM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
> Hello Xiao,
>
> My review comment:
> You code only work in modern system. the boundary is 4k not 512, because using hardcode 4k to call calc_bitmap_size
>
> In current cluster env, if bitmap area beyond 4K size (or 512 in very old system), locate_bitmap1
> will return wrong address.
>
> Please refer write_bitmap1() to saparate 512 & 4096 case.
>
> On 10/28/20 2:04 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>> Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
>> add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
>> index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
>> --- a/super1.c
>> +++ b/super1.c
>> @@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
>>
>> static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>> {
>> - unsigned long long offset;
>> + unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
>> struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
>> + bitmap_super_t *bms;
>> int mustfree = 0;
>> int ret;
>>
>> @@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>> ret = 0;
>> else
>> ret = -1;
>> - offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
>> - offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
>> +
>> + offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
>> + if (node_num) {
>> + bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
>> + bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
>> + offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
>> + }
>> if (mustfree)
>> free(sb);
>> lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
2020-10-30 5:53 ` Xiao Ni
@ 2020-10-30 6:44 ` heming.zhao
2020-11-25 23:18 ` Jes Sorensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: heming.zhao @ 2020-10-30 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiao Ni, jes; +Cc: ncroxon, heinzm, linux-raid
You are right. Only cluster case can trigger your patch code.
Hardcode 4096 is correct.
On 10/30/20 1:53 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
> Hi Heming
>
> The cluster raid is only supported by super 1.2, so we don't need to consider the old system when
> it's a cluster raid.
>
> Regards
> Xiao
>
> On 10/28/2020 08:29 PM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
>> Hello Xiao,
>>
>> My review comment:
>> You code only work in modern system. the boundary is 4k not 512, because using hardcode 4k to call calc_bitmap_size
>>
>> In current cluster env, if bitmap area beyond 4K size (or 512 in very old system), locate_bitmap1
>> will return wrong address.
>>
>> Please refer write_bitmap1() to saparate 512 & 4096 case.
>>
>> On 10/28/20 2:04 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>> Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
>>> add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
>>> index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
>>> --- a/super1.c
>>> +++ b/super1.c
>>> @@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
>>> static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>> {
>>> - unsigned long long offset;
>>> + unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
>>> struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
>>> + bitmap_super_t *bms;
>>> int mustfree = 0;
>>> int ret;
>>> @@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>> ret = 0;
>>> else
>>> ret = -1;
>>> - offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
>>> - offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
>>> +
>>> + offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
>>> + if (node_num) {
>>> + bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
>>> + bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
>>> + offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
>>> + }
>>> if (mustfree)
>>> free(sb);
>>> lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
>>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
2020-10-30 6:44 ` heming.zhao
@ 2020-11-25 23:18 ` Jes Sorensen
2020-11-26 1:43 ` heming.zhao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2020-11-25 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heming.zhao, Xiao Ni; +Cc: ncroxon, heinzm, linux-raid
On 10/30/20 2:44 AM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
> You are right. Only cluster case can trigger your patch code.
> Hardcode 4096 is correct.
Just catching up, was the conclusion the original patch was correct?
Thanks,
Jes
> On 10/30/20 1:53 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>> Hi Heming
>>
>> The cluster raid is only supported by super 1.2, so we don't need to consider the old system when
>> it's a cluster raid.
>>
>> Regards
>> Xiao
>>
>> On 10/28/2020 08:29 PM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
>>> Hello Xiao,
>>>
>>> My review comment:
>>> You code only work in modern system. the boundary is 4k not 512, because using hardcode 4k to call calc_bitmap_size
>>>
>>> In current cluster env, if bitmap area beyond 4K size (or 512 in very old system), locate_bitmap1
>>> will return wrong address.
>>>
>>> Please refer write_bitmap1() to saparate 512 & 4096 case.
>>>
>>> On 10/28/20 2:04 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>>> Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
>>>> add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
>>>> index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
>>>> --- a/super1.c
>>>> +++ b/super1.c
>>>> @@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
>>>> static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>> {
>>>> - unsigned long long offset;
>>>> + unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
>>>> struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
>>>> + bitmap_super_t *bms;
>>>> int mustfree = 0;
>>>> int ret;
>>>> @@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>> ret = 0;
>>>> else
>>>> ret = -1;
>>>> - offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
>>>> - offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
>>>> +
>>>> + offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
>>>> + if (node_num) {
>>>> + bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
>>>> + bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
>>>> + offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
>>>> + }
>>>> if (mustfree)
>>>> free(sb);
>>>> lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
>>>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
2020-11-25 23:18 ` Jes Sorensen
@ 2020-11-26 1:43 ` heming.zhao
2021-02-26 22:00 ` Jes Sorensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: heming.zhao @ 2020-11-26 1:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jes Sorensen, Xiao Ni; +Cc: ncroxon, heinzm, linux-raid
On 11/26/20 7:18 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 10/30/20 2:44 AM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
>> You are right. Only cluster case can trigger your patch code.
>> Hardcode 4096 is correct.
>
> Just catching up, was the conclusion the original patch was correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Jes
>
Xiao's patch (original patch) is correct.
Thanks.
>
>> On 10/30/20 1:53 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>> Hi Heming
>>>
>>> The cluster raid is only supported by super 1.2, so we don't need to consider the old system when
>>> it's a cluster raid.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Xiao
>>>
>>> On 10/28/2020 08:29 PM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
>>>> Hello Xiao,
>>>>
>>>> My review comment:
>>>> You code only work in modern system. the boundary is 4k not 512, because using hardcode 4k to call calc_bitmap_size
>>>>
>>>> In current cluster env, if bitmap area beyond 4K size (or 512 in very old system), locate_bitmap1
>>>> will return wrong address.
>>>>
>>>> Please refer write_bitmap1() to saparate 512 & 4096 case.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/28/20 2:04 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>>>> Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
>>>>> add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
>>>>> index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
>>>>> --- a/super1.c
>>>>> +++ b/super1.c
>>>>> @@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
>>>>> static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - unsigned long long offset;
>>>>> + unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
>>>>> struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
>>>>> + bitmap_super_t *bms;
>>>>> int mustfree = 0;
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> @@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>>> ret = 0;
>>>>> else
>>>>> ret = -1;
>>>>> - offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
>>>>> - offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
>>>>> + if (node_num) {
>>>>> + bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
>>>>> + bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
>>>>> + offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> if (mustfree)
>>>>> free(sb);
>>>>> lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
2020-11-26 1:43 ` heming.zhao
@ 2021-02-26 22:00 ` Jes Sorensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2021-02-26 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: heming.zhao, Xiao Ni; +Cc: ncroxon, heinzm, linux-raid
On 11/25/20 8:43 PM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
> On 11/26/20 7:18 AM, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> On 10/30/20 2:44 AM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
>>> You are right. Only cluster case can trigger your patch code.
>>> Hardcode 4096 is correct.
>>
>> Just catching up, was the conclusion the original patch was correct?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jes
>>
> Xiao's patch (original patch) is correct.
>
> Thanks.
Applied!
Thanks,
Jes
>>
>>> On 10/30/20 1:53 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>>> Hi Heming
>>>>
>>>> The cluster raid is only supported by super 1.2, so we don't need to consider the old system when
>>>> it's a cluster raid.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Xiao
>>>>
>>>> On 10/28/2020 08:29 PM, heming.zhao@suse.com wrote:
>>>>> Hello Xiao,
>>>>>
>>>>> My review comment:
>>>>> You code only work in modern system. the boundary is 4k not 512, because using hardcode 4k to call calc_bitmap_size
>>>>>
>>>>> In current cluster env, if bitmap area beyond 4K size (or 512 in very old system), locate_bitmap1
>>>>> will return wrong address.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please refer write_bitmap1() to saparate 512 & 4096 case.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/28/20 2:04 PM, Xiao Ni wrote:
>>>>>> Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
>>>>>> add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
>>>>>> index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/super1.c
>>>>>> +++ b/super1.c
>>>>>> @@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
>>>>>> static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> - unsigned long long offset;
>>>>>> + unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
>>>>>> struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
>>>>>> + bitmap_super_t *bms;
>>>>>> int mustfree = 0;
>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>> @@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
>>>>>> ret = 0;
>>>>>> else
>>>>>> ret = -1;
>>>>>> - offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
>>>>>> - offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
>>>>>> + if (node_num) {
>>>>>> + bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
>>>>>> + bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
>>>>>> + offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> if (mustfree)
>>>>>> free(sb);
>>>>>> lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly
@ 2020-10-28 5:57 Xiao Ni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Ni @ 2020-10-28 5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid, jes; +Cc: heming.zhao, ncroxon, heinzm
Now it only adds bitmap offset based on cluster nodes. It's not right. It needs to
add per node bitmap space to find next node bitmap position.
Signed-off-by: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
---
super1.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index 8b0d6ff..b5b379b 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -2582,8 +2582,9 @@ add_internal_bitmap1(struct supertype *st,
static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
{
- unsigned long long offset;
+ unsigned long long offset, bm_sectors_per_node;
struct mdp_superblock_1 *sb;
+ bitmap_super_t *bms;
int mustfree = 0;
int ret;
@@ -2598,8 +2599,13 @@ static int locate_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, int node_num)
ret = 0;
else
ret = -1;
- offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset);
- offset += (int32_t) __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset) * (node_num + 1);
+
+ offset = __le64_to_cpu(sb->super_offset) + __le32_to_cpu(sb->bitmap_offset);
+ if (node_num) {
+ bms = (bitmap_super_t*)(((char*)sb)+MAX_SB_SIZE);
+ bm_sectors_per_node = calc_bitmap_size(bms, 4096) >> 9;
+ offset += bm_sectors_per_node * node_num;
+ }
if (mustfree)
free(sb);
lseek64(fd, offset<<9, 0);
--
2.7.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-26 22:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-28 6:04 [PATCH 1/1] mdadm/bitmap: locate bitmap calcuate bitmap position wrongly Xiao Ni
2020-10-28 12:29 ` heming.zhao
2020-10-30 5:53 ` Xiao Ni
2020-10-30 6:44 ` heming.zhao
2020-11-25 23:18 ` Jes Sorensen
2020-11-26 1:43 ` heming.zhao
2021-02-26 22:00 ` Jes Sorensen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-28 5:57 Xiao Ni
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).