linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@redhat.com>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	RDMA mailing list <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core] kernel-boot: Tighten check if device is virtual
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 16:31:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191003163127.GE26151@mellanox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190928165416.GL14368@unreal>

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 07:54:16PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 01:58:38PM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
> > On 09/26/2019 08:34 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:42:53PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>
> > >>
> > >> Virtual devices like SIW or RXE don't set FW version because
> > >> they don't have one, use that fact to rely on having empty
> > >> fw_ver file to sense such virtual devices.
> > >
> > > Have you checked that every physical device does set fw version?
> > >
> > > Seems hacky
> >
> > agreed, how are tuntap devices handled, is there a similar handling that
> > can be applied here?
> 
> Unfortunately, we can't do the same, RDMA doesn't have notion of stacked devices.
> 
> 1.
> TUN devices are initialized with ARPHRD_NONE type.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/net/tun.c#L1396
> 
> It causes for systemd-udev to skip their rename.
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/udev/udev-builtin-net_id.c#L781
> 
> 2.
> TAP devices are skipped due to the fact that iflink != ifindex on such devices.
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/src/udev/udev-builtin-net_id.c#L810
> 
> So, yes hacky, but the solution is tailored to RDMA subsystem where ALL
> devices have FW and we can ensure that ALL future devices will report any
> sort of string through fw_ver file.

It still seems really hacky, why not add some device flag or something
instead? Is this better because it works with old kernels?

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-26  9:42 [PATCH rdma-core] kernel-boot: Tighten check if device is virtual Leon Romanovsky
2019-09-26 12:29 ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-09-26 12:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-09-26 12:42   ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-09-26 17:58   ` Jonathan Toppins
2019-09-28 16:54     ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-03 16:31       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-05  6:12         ` Leon Romanovsky
2019-10-02 11:47 ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191003163127.GE26151@mellanox.com \
    --to=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jtoppins@redhat.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).