linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/15] RDMA/mlx5: Reduce locking in implicit_mr_get_data()
Date: Wed,  9 Oct 2019 13:09:30 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191009160934.3143-11-jgg@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009160934.3143-1-jgg@ziepe.ca>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

Now that the child MRs are stored in an xarray we can rely on the SRCU
lock to protect the xa_load and use xa_cmpxchg on the slow allocation path
to resolve races with concurrent page fault.

This reduces the scope of the critical section of umem_mutex for implicit
MRs to only cover mlx5_ib_update_xlt, and avoids taking a lock at all if
the child MR is already in the xarray. This makes it consistent with the
normal ODP MR critical section for umem_lock, and the locking approach
used for destroying an unusued implicit child MR.

The MLX5_IB_UPD_XLT_ATOMIC is no longer needed in implicit_get_child_mr()
since it is no longer called with any locks.

Reviewed-by: Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c
index d70cf02343a79f..e8413fd1b8c73b 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c
@@ -381,8 +381,7 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_mr *implicit_get_child_mr(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr,
 				 MLX5_IMR_MTT_ENTRIES,
 				 PAGE_SHIFT,
 				 MLX5_IB_UPD_XLT_ZAP |
-				 MLX5_IB_UPD_XLT_ENABLE |
-				 MLX5_IB_UPD_XLT_ATOMIC);
+				 MLX5_IB_UPD_XLT_ENABLE);
 	if (err) {
 		ret = ERR_PTR(err);
 		goto out_release;
@@ -392,9 +391,16 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_mr *implicit_get_child_mr(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr,
 	 * Once the store to either xarray completes any error unwind has to
 	 * use synchronize_srcu(). Avoid this with xa_reserve()
 	 */
-	err = xa_err(xa_store(&imr->implicit_children, idx, mr, GFP_KERNEL));
-	if (err) {
-		ret = ERR_PTR(err);
+	ret = xa_cmpxchg(&imr->implicit_children, idx, NULL, mr, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (unlikely(ret)) {
+		if (xa_is_err(ret)) {
+			ret = ERR_PTR(xa_err(ret));
+			goto out_release;
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Another thread beat us to creating the child mr, use
+		 * theirs.
+		 */
 		goto out_release;
 	}
 
@@ -424,7 +430,8 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_mr *implicit_mr_get_data(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr,
 	struct mlx5_ib_mr *result = NULL;
 	int ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&odp_imr->umem_mutex);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&imr->dev->odp_srcu);
+
 	for (idx = idx; idx <= end_idx; idx++) {
 		struct mlx5_ib_mr *mtt = xa_load(&imr->implicit_children, idx);
 
@@ -450,20 +457,27 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_mr *implicit_mr_get_data(struct mlx5_ib_mr *imr,
 	 */
 out:
 	if (likely(!inv_len))
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return result;
 
+	/*
+	 * Notice this is not strictly ordered right, the KSM is updated after
+	 * the implicit_leaves is updated, so a parallel page fault could see
+	 * a MR that is not yet visible in the KSM.  This is similar to a
+	 * parallel page fault seeing a MR that is being concurrently removed
+	 * from the KSM. Both of these improbable situations are resolved
+	 * safely by resuming the HW and then taking another page fault. The
+	 * next pagefault handler will see the new information.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&odp_imr->umem_mutex);
 	ret = mlx5_ib_update_xlt(imr, inv_start_idx, inv_len, 0,
 				 MLX5_IB_UPD_XLT_INDIRECT |
 					 MLX5_IB_UPD_XLT_ATOMIC);
+	mutex_unlock(&odp_imr->umem_mutex);
 	if (ret) {
 		mlx5_ib_err(to_mdev(imr->ibmr.pd->device),
 			    "Failed to update PAS\n");
-		result = ERR_PTR(ret);
-		goto out_unlock;
+		return ERR_PTR(ret);
 	}
-
-out_unlock:
-	mutex_unlock(&odp_imr->umem_mutex);
 	return result;
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-09 16:09 [PATCH 00/15] Rework the locking and datastructures for mlx5 implicit ODP Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 01/15] RDMA/mlx5: Use SRCU properly in ODP prefetch Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-25 19:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 02/15] RDMA/mlx5: Split sig_err MR data into its own xarray Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 03/15] RDMA/mlx5: Use a dedicated mkey xarray for ODP Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 04/15] RDMA/mlx5: Delete struct mlx5_priv->mkey_table Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 05/15] RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit_mr_get_data Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 06/15] RDMA/mlx5: Lift implicit_mr_alloc() into the two routines that call it Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 07/15] RDMA/mlx5: Set the HW IOVA of the child MRs to their place in the tree Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 08/15] RDMA/mlx5: Split implicit handling from pagefault_mr Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 09/15] RDMA/mlx5: Use an xarray for the children of an implicit ODP Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/mlx5: Avoid double lookups on the pagefault path Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 12/15] RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit ODP destroy Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 13/15] RDMA/mlx5: Do not store implicit children in the odp_mkeys xarray Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 14/15] RDMA/mlx5: Do not race with mlx5_ib_invalidate_range during create and destroy Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 14:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 15/15] RDMA/odp: Remove broken debugging call to invalidate_range Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 19:47 ` [PATCH 00/15] Rework the locking and datastructures for mlx5 implicit ODP Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191009160934.3143-11-jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=artemyko@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).