From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] Rework the locking and datastructures for mlx5 implicit ODP
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:47:40 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191028194740.GA4107@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191009160934.3143-1-jgg@ziepe.ca>
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 01:09:20PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
>
> In order to hoist the interval tree code out of the drivers and into the
> mmu_notifiers it is necessary for the drivers to not use the interval tree
> for other things.
>
> This series replaces the interval tree with an xarray and along the way
> re-aligns all the locking to use a sensible SRCU model where the 'update'
> step is done by modifying an xarray.
>
> The result is overall much simpler and with less locking in the critical
> path. Many functions were reworked for clarity and small details like
> using 'imr' to refer to the implicit MR make the entire code flow here
> more readable.
>
> This also squashes at least two race bugs on its own, and quite possibily
> more that haven't been identified.
>
> Jason Gunthorpe (15):
> RDMA/mlx5: Use SRCU properly in ODP prefetch
> RDMA/mlx5: Split sig_err MR data into its own xarray
> RDMA/mlx5: Use a dedicated mkey xarray for ODP
> RDMA/mlx5: Delete struct mlx5_priv->mkey_table
> RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit_mr_get_data
> RDMA/mlx5: Lift implicit_mr_alloc() into the two routines that call it
> RDMA/mlx5: Set the HW IOVA of the child MRs to their place in the tree
> RDMA/mlx5: Split implicit handling from pagefault_mr
> RDMA/mlx5: Use an xarray for the children of an implicit ODP
> RDMA/mlx5: Reduce locking in implicit_mr_get_data()
> RDMA/mlx5: Avoid double lookups on the pagefault path
> RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit ODP destroy
> RDMA/mlx5: Do not store implicit children in the odp_mkeys xarray
> RDMA/mlx5: Do not race with mlx5_ib_invalidate_range during create and
> destroy
> RDMA/odp: Remove broken debugging call to invalidate_range
Applied to for-next with the two noted fixes
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 16:09 [PATCH 00/15] Rework the locking and datastructures for mlx5 implicit ODP Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 01/15] RDMA/mlx5: Use SRCU properly in ODP prefetch Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-25 19:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 02/15] RDMA/mlx5: Split sig_err MR data into its own xarray Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 03/15] RDMA/mlx5: Use a dedicated mkey xarray for ODP Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 04/15] RDMA/mlx5: Delete struct mlx5_priv->mkey_table Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 05/15] RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit_mr_get_data Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 06/15] RDMA/mlx5: Lift implicit_mr_alloc() into the two routines that call it Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 07/15] RDMA/mlx5: Set the HW IOVA of the child MRs to their place in the tree Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 08/15] RDMA/mlx5: Split implicit handling from pagefault_mr Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 09/15] RDMA/mlx5: Use an xarray for the children of an implicit ODP Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 10/15] RDMA/mlx5: Reduce locking in implicit_mr_get_data() Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 11/15] RDMA/mlx5: Avoid double lookups on the pagefault path Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 12/15] RDMA/mlx5: Rework implicit ODP destroy Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 13/15] RDMA/mlx5: Do not store implicit children in the odp_mkeys xarray Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 14/15] RDMA/mlx5: Do not race with mlx5_ib_invalidate_range during create and destroy Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 14:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 16:09 ` [PATCH 15/15] RDMA/odp: Remove broken debugging call to invalidate_range Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-28 19:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191028194740.GA4107@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).