linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 2/7] vfio: Add an API to check migration state transition validity
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:46:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210927164648.1e2d49ac.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c87f55d6fec77a22b110d3c9611744e6b28bba46.1632305919.git.leonro@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:38:51 +0300
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
> 
> Add an API in the core layer to check migration state transition validity
> as part of a migration flow.
> 
> The valid transitions follow the expected usage as described in
> uapi/vfio.h and triggered by QEMU.
> 
> This ensures that all migration implementations follow a consistent
> migration state machine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/vfio.c  | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/vfio.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> index 3c034fe14ccb..c3ca33e513c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
> @@ -1664,6 +1664,47 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * vfio_change_migration_state_allowed - Checks whether a migration state
> + *   transition is valid.
> + * @new_state: The new state to move to.
> + * @old_state: The old state.
> + * Return: true if the transition is valid.
> + */
> +bool vfio_change_migration_state_allowed(u32 new_state, u32 old_state)
> +{
> +	enum { MAX_STATE = VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING };
> +	static const u8 vfio_from_state_table[MAX_STATE + 1][MAX_STATE + 1] = {
> +		[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = {
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING] = 1,
> +		},

Our state transition diagram is pretty weak on reachable transitions
out of the _STOP state, why do we select only these two as valid?

Consistent behavior to userspace is of course nice, but I wonder if we
were expecting a device reset to get us back to _RUNNING, or if the
drivers would make use of the protocol through which a driver can nak
(write error, no state change) or fault (_ERROR device state) a state
change.

There does need to be a way to get back to _RUNNING to support a
migration failure without a reset, but would that be from _SAVING
or from _STOP and what's our rationale for the excluded states?

I'll see if I can dig through emails to find what was intended to be
reachable from _STOP.  Kirti or Connie, do you recall?

Also, I think the _ERROR state is implicitly handled correctly here,
its value is >MAX_STATE so we can't transition into or out of it, but a
comment to indicate that it's been considered for this would be nice.

> +		[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = {
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = 1,
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING | VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> +		},

Shameer's comment is correct here, _RESUMING is a valid next state
since the default state is _RUNNING.

> +		[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = {
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> +		},

What's the rationale that we can't return to _SAVING|_RUNNING here?

> +		[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING | VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = {
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = 1,
> +		},

Can't we always _STOP the device at any point?

> +		[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING] = {
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
> +			[VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
> +		},

Couldn't it be possible to switch immediately to _RUNNING|_SAVING for
tracing purposes?  Or _SAVING, perhaps to validate the restored state
without starting the device?  Thanks,

Alex

> +	};
> +
> +	if (new_state > MAX_STATE || old_state > MAX_STATE)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return vfio_from_state_table[old_state][new_state];
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_change_migration_state_allowed);
> +
>  static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
>  				       unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
> index b53a9557884a..e65137a708f1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ extern struct vfio_device *vfio_device_get_from_dev(struct device *dev);
>  extern void vfio_device_put(struct vfio_device *device);
>  
>  int vfio_assign_device_set(struct vfio_device *device, void *set_id);
> +bool vfio_change_migration_state_allowed(u32 new_state, u32 old_state);
>  
>  /* events for the backend driver notify callback */
>  enum vfio_iommu_notify_type {


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-27 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1632305919.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 1/7] PCI/IOV: Provide internal VF index Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-22 21:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-23  6:35     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-24 13:08       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-25 10:10         ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-25 17:41           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-26  6:36             ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-26 20:23               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-27 11:55                 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-27 14:47                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 2/7] vfio: Add an API to check migration state transition validity Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 10:33   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-23 11:17     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 13:55       ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-24  7:44         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-24  9:37           ` Kirti Wankhede
2021-09-26  9:09           ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-26 16:17             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-27 18:24               ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-27 18:29                 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-27 22:46   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2021-09-27 23:12     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-28 19:19       ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-28 19:35         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-28 20:18           ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 16:16             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-29 18:06               ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 18:26                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-29 10:57         ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 10:44       ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 12:35         ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 13:26           ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 13:50             ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 14:36               ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 15:17                 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 15:28                   ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 16:14                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-29 21:48                       ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 22:44                         ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-30  9:25                           ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 12:41                             ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 23:21                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-30  9:34                           ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 14:47                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-30 15:32                               ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 16:24                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-30 16:51                                   ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 17:01                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 3/7] vfio/pci_core: Make the region->release() function optional Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 13:57   ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 4/7] net/mlx5: Introduce migration bits and structures Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-24  5:48   ` Mark Zhang
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 5/7] net/mlx5: Expose APIs to get/put the mlx5 core device Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 6/7] mlx5_vfio_pci: Expose migration commands over mlx5 device Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-28 20:22   ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29  5:36     ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 7/7] mlx5_vfio_pci: Implement vfio_pci driver for mlx5 devices Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210927164648.1e2d49ac.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).