linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
	Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: Apparent regression in blktests since 5.18-rc1+
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 08:29:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b0153c7-a8e9-98de-26ae-d421434a116d@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf8b9980-3965-a4f6-07e0-d4b25755b0db@acm.org>

在 2022/5/7 8:10, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> On 5/6/22 11:11, Bob Pearson wrote:
>> Before the most recent kernel update I had blktests running OK on 
>> rdma_rxe. Since we went on to 5.18.0-rc1+
>> I have been experiencing hangs. All of this is with the 'revert 
>> scsi-debug' patch which addressed the
>> 3 min timeout related to modprobe -r scsi-debug.
>>
>> You suggested checking with siw and I finally got around to this and 
>> the behavior is exactly the same.
>>
>> Specifically here is a run and dmesgs from that run:
>>
>> root@u-22:/home/bob/src/blktests# use_siw=1 ./check srp
>>
>> srp/001 (Create and remove LUNs)                             [passed]
>>
>>      runtime  3.388s  ...  3.501s
>>
>> srp/002 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and 
>> login (mq))
>>
>>      runtime  54.689s  ...
>>    <HANGS HERE>
>>
>> I had to reboot to recover.
>>
>> The dmesg output is attached in a long file called out.
>> The output looks normal until line 1875 where it hangs at an "Already 
>> connected ..." message.
>> This is the same as the other hangs I have been seeing.
>> This is followed by a splat warning that a cpu has hung for 120 seconds.
>>
>> Since this is behaving the same for rxe and siw I am going to stop 
>> chasing this bug since
>> it is most likely outside of the the rxe driver.
> 
> Hi Bob,
> 
> What I see on my test setup is that the SRP tests from the blktests 
> suite pass with
> the SoftiWARP driver (kernel v5.18-rc5 / commit 4b97bac0756a):
> 
> # (cd blktests && use_siw=1 ./check -q srp)
> srp/001 (Create and remove LUNs)                             [passed]
>      runtime  5.781s  ...  5.464s
> srp/002 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login 
> (mq)) [passed]time  40.772s  ...
>      runtime  40.772s  ...  42.039s
> srp/003 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login 
> (sq)) [not run]
>      legacy device mapper support is missing
> srp/004 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login 
> (sq-on-srp/004 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout 
> and login (sq-on-mq)) [not run]
>      legacy device mapper support is missing
> srp/005 (Direct I/O with large transfer sizes, cmd_sg_entries=255 and 
> bs=4M) [passed]untime  17.870s  ...
>      runtime  17.870s  ...  17.016s
> srp/006 (Direct I/O with large transfer sizes, cmd_sg_entries=255 and 
> bs=8M) [passed]untime  16.369s  ...
>      runtime  16.369s  ...  17.315s
> srp/007 (Direct I/O with large transfer sizes, cmd_sg_entries=1 and 
> bs=4M) [passed] runtime  16.729s  ...
>      runtime  16.729s  ...  17.409s
> srp/008 (Direct I/O with large transfer sizes, cmd_sg_entries=1 and 
> bs=8M) [passed] runtime  16.823s  ...
>      runtime  16.823s  ...  16.453s
> srp/009 (Buffered I/O with large transfer sizes, cmd_sg_entries=255 and 
> bs=4M) [passed]time  17.304s  ...
>      runtime  17.304s  ...  17.838s
> srp/010 (Buffered I/O with large transfer sizes, cmd_sg_entries=255 and 
> bs=8M) [passed]time  17.191s  ...
>      runtime  17.191s  ...  17.117s
> srp/011 (Block I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and 
> login) [passed] runtime  40.835s  ...
>      runtime  40.835s  ...  38.728s
> srp/012 (dm-mpath on top of multiple I/O schedulers)         [passed]
>      runtime  23.703s  ...  24.763s
> srp/013 (Direct I/O using a discontiguous buffer)            [passed]
>      runtime  11.279s  ...  9.265s
> srp/014 (Run sg_reset while I/O is ongoing)                  [passed]
>      runtime  39.110s  ...  37.929s
> srp/015 (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login 
> (mq) ussrp/015
>      (File I/O on top of multipath concurrently with logout and login 
> (mq) using the SoftiWARP (siw) driver) [passed]
>      runtime  40.027s  ...  40.220s
> 
> If I try to run the SRP test 002 with the soft-RoCE driver, the 
> following appears:
> 
> [  749.901966] ================================
> [  749.903638] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
> [  749.905376] 5.18.0-rc5-dbg+ #1 Not tainted
> [  749.907039] --------------------------------
> [  749.908699] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
> [  749.910646] ksoftirqd/5/40 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE0:SE0] takes:
> [  749.912499] ffff88818244d350 (&xa->xa_lock#14){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: 
> rxe_pool_get_index+0x73/0x170 [rdma_rxe]
> [  749.914691] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
> [  749.916648]   __lock_acquire+0x45b/0xce0
> [  749.918599]   lock_acquire+0x18a/0x450
> [  749.920480]   _raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x50
> [  749.922580]   __rxe_add_to_pool+0xcc/0x140 [rdma_rxe]
> [  749.924583]   rxe_alloc_pd+0x2d/0x40 [rdma_rxe]
> [  749.926394]   __ib_alloc_pd+0xa3/0x270 [ib_core]
> [  749.928579]   ib_mad_port_open+0x44a/0x790 [ib_core]
> [  749.930640]   ib_mad_init_device+0x8e/0x110 [ib_core]
> [  749.932495]   add_client_context+0x26a/0x330 [ib_core]
> [  749.934302]   enable_device_and_get+0x169/0x2b0 [ib_core]
> [  749.936217]   ib_register_device+0x26f/0x330 [ib_core]
> [  749.938020]   rxe_register_device+0x1b4/0x1d0 [rdma_rxe]
> [  749.939794]   rxe_add+0x8c/0xc0 [rdma_rxe]
> [  749.941552]   rxe_net_add+0x5b/0x90 [rdma_rxe]
> [  749.943356]   rxe_newlink+0x71/0x80 [rdma_rxe]
> [  749.945182]   nldev_newlink+0x21e/0x370 [ib_core]
> [  749.946917]   rdma_nl_rcv_msg+0x200/0x410 [ib_core]
> [  749.948657]   rdma_nl_rcv+0x140/0x220 [ib_core]
> [  749.950373]   netlink_unicast+0x307/0x460
> [  749.952063]   netlink_sendmsg+0x422/0x750
> [  749.953672]   __sys_sendto+0x1c2/0x250
> [  749.955281]   __x64_sys_sendto+0x7f/0x90
> [  749.956849]   do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
> [  749.958353]   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> [  749.959942] irq event stamp: 1411849
> [  749.961517] hardirqs last  enabled at (1411848): [<ffffffff810cdb28>] 
> __local_bh_enable_ip+0x88/0xf0
> [  749.963338] hardirqs last disabled at (1411849): [<ffffffff81ebf24d>] 
> _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5d/0x60
> [  749.965214] softirqs last  enabled at (1411838): [<ffffffff82200467>] 
> __do_softirq+0x467/0x6e1
> [  749.967027] softirqs last disabled at (1411843): [<ffffffff810cd947>] 
> run_ksoftirqd+0x37/0x60
To this, Please use this patch series 
news://nntp.lore.kernel.org:119/20220422194416.983549-1-yanjun.zhu@linux.dev

Zhu Yanjun
> 
> I think the above is strong evidence that there is something wrong with the
> soft-RoCE driver.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-07  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06 18:11 Apparent regression in blktests since 5.18-rc1+ Bob Pearson
2022-05-07  0:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-07  0:29   ` Yanjun Zhu [this message]
2022-05-07  1:29     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-07  1:55       ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-07 13:43         ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-08  4:13           ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-10 15:24             ` Pearson, Robert B
2022-05-12 21:57             ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-12 22:25               ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-13  0:41                 ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-13  3:40                   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-17 15:21                     ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-17 20:44                       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-05-17 20:54                         ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-17 20:59                         ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-08  8:43         ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-09  8:01       ` Zhu Yanjun
2022-05-09 11:52         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-09 12:31           ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-09 12:33             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-09 12:42               ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-05-07 13:40     ` Bob Pearson
2022-05-09  6:56 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-05-10  3:53   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4b0153c7-a8e9-98de-26ae-d421434a116d@linux.dev \
    --to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
    --cc=bmt@zurich.ibm.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).