From: liweihang <liweihang@huawei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>,
"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-next 04/10] RDMA/hns: Optimize hns_roce_alloc_vf_resource()
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:09:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B82435381E3B2943AA4D2826ADEF0B3A022B650A@DGGEML502-MBS.china.huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200326195135.GA27277@ziepe.ca
On 2020/3/27 3:51, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:23:36AM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
>
>> @@ -2028,6 +2002,13 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_profile(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
>> if (ret)
>> set_default_caps(hr_dev);
>>
>> + ret = hns_roce_alloc_vf_resource(hr_dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(hr_dev->dev, "Allocate vf resource fail, ret = %d.\n",
>> + ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>
> It is unfortunate these have to remain as dev_err()
>
> I've thought about setting the name during ib_alloc_dev, which would
> avoid this, what do you think?
>
> Jason
>
Hi Jason,
Thanks for your comments. I agree with you and make a simple test by just
moving assign_name() into _ib_alloc_device(), and ibdev_*() works fine
anywhere in hns. But I'm not sure if there are any side effects.
I noticed that the code about name assignment is implemented by you, could
you please explain why put assign_name() in ib_register_device() rather than
ib_alloc_device()?
Thanks
Weihang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-20 3:23 [PATCH v2 for-next 00/10] RDMA/hns: Various cleanups Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 01/10] RDMA/hns: Unify format of prints Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 02/10] RDMA/hns: Fix a wrong judgment of return value Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 03/10] RDMA/hns: Simplify attribute judgment code Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 04/10] RDMA/hns: Optimize hns_roce_alloc_vf_resource() Weihang Li
2020-03-26 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-27 7:09 ` liweihang [this message]
2020-03-27 12:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-28 1:55 ` liweihang
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 05/10] RDMA/hns: Adjust the qp status value sequence of the hardware Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 06/10] RDMA/hns: Remove definition of cq doorbell structure Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 07/10] RDMA/hns: Remove meaningless prints Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 08/10] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant qpc setup operations Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 09/10] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant assignment of wc->smac when polling cq Weihang Li
2020-03-20 3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 10/10] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant judgment of qp_type Weihang Li
2020-03-26 19:55 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 00/10] RDMA/hns: Various cleanups Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B82435381E3B2943AA4D2826ADEF0B3A022B650A@DGGEML502-MBS.china.huawei.com \
--to=liweihang@huawei.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).