linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: liweihang <liweihang@huawei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>,
	"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-next 04/10] RDMA/hns: Optimize hns_roce_alloc_vf_resource()
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 01:55:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B82435381E3B2943AA4D2826ADEF0B3A022B7373@DGGEML502-MBS.china.huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200327123642.GT20941@ziepe.ca

On 2020/3/27 20:36, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 07:09:02AM +0000, liweihang wrote:
>> On 2020/3/27 3:51, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:23:36AM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
>>>
>>>> @@ -2028,6 +2002,13 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_profile(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
>>>>  	if (ret)
>>>>  		set_default_caps(hr_dev);
>>>>  
>>>> +	ret = hns_roce_alloc_vf_resource(hr_dev);
>>>> +	if (ret) {
>>>> +		dev_err(hr_dev->dev, "Allocate vf resource fail, ret = %d.\n",
>>>> +			ret);
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +	}
>>>
>>> It is unfortunate these have to remain as dev_err()
>>>
>>> I've thought about setting the name during ib_alloc_dev, which would
>>> avoid this, what do you think?
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments. I agree with you and make a simple test by just
>> moving assign_name() into _ib_alloc_device(), and ibdev_*() works fine
>> anywhere in hns. But I'm not sure if there are any side effects.
> 
> Hmm. It actually looks like it should work now, older versions may
> have had problems, but this looks OK.
> 
> Jason
> 
OK, I will make a series to modify.

Thank you
Weihang

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-28  1:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20  3:23 [PATCH v2 for-next 00/10] RDMA/hns: Various cleanups Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 01/10] RDMA/hns: Unify format of prints Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 02/10] RDMA/hns: Fix a wrong judgment of return value Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 03/10] RDMA/hns: Simplify attribute judgment code Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 04/10] RDMA/hns: Optimize hns_roce_alloc_vf_resource() Weihang Li
2020-03-26 19:51   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-27  7:09     ` liweihang
2020-03-27 12:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-28  1:55         ` liweihang [this message]
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 05/10] RDMA/hns: Adjust the qp status value sequence of the hardware Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 06/10] RDMA/hns: Remove definition of cq doorbell structure Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 07/10] RDMA/hns: Remove meaningless prints Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 08/10] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant qpc setup operations Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 09/10] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant assignment of wc->smac when polling cq Weihang Li
2020-03-20  3:23 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 10/10] RDMA/hns: Remove redundant judgment of qp_type Weihang Li
2020-03-26 19:55 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 00/10] RDMA/hns: Various cleanups Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B82435381E3B2943AA4D2826ADEF0B3A022B7373@DGGEML502-MBS.china.huawei.com \
    --to=liweihang@huawei.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).