linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [bug report] net/mlx5: Add direct rule fs_cmd implementation
@ 2022-05-11 13:57 Dan Carpenter
  2022-05-24 13:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2022-05-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: maorg; +Cc: linux-rdma

[ I was reviewing old use after free warnings and stumbled across this
  one which still needs fixing - dan ]

Hello Maor Gottlieb,

The patch 6a48faeeca10: "net/mlx5: Add direct rule fs_cmd
implementation" from Aug 20, 2019, leads to the following Smatch
static checker warning:

	drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/fs_dr.c:53 set_miss_action()
	warn: 'action' was already freed.

drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/fs_dr.c
    28 static int set_miss_action(struct mlx5_flow_root_namespace *ns,
    29                            struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
    30                            struct mlx5_flow_table *next_ft)
    31 {
    32         struct mlx5dr_action *old_miss_action;
    33         struct mlx5dr_action *action = NULL;
    34         struct mlx5dr_table *next_tbl;
    35         int err;
    36 
    37         next_tbl = next_ft ? next_ft->fs_dr_table.dr_table : NULL;
    38         if (next_tbl) {
    39                 action = mlx5dr_action_create_dest_table(next_tbl);
    40                 if (!action)
    41                         return -EINVAL;
    42         }
    43         old_miss_action = ft->fs_dr_table.miss_action;
    44         err = mlx5dr_table_set_miss_action(ft->fs_dr_table.dr_table, action);
    45         if (err && action) {
    46                 err = mlx5dr_action_destroy(action);
    47                 if (err) {
    48                         action = NULL;
    49                         mlx5_core_err(ns->dev, "Failed to destroy action (%d)\n",
    50                                       err);
    51                 }

If "err" is zero then "action" is freed.

    52         }
--> 53         ft->fs_dr_table.miss_action = action;
                                             ^^^^^^
Use after free.

    54         if (old_miss_action) {
    55                 err = mlx5dr_action_destroy(old_miss_action);
    56                 if (err)
    57                         mlx5_core_err(ns->dev, "Failed to destroy action (%d)\n",
    58                                       err);
    59         }
    60 
    61         return err;
    62 }

regards,
dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [bug report] net/mlx5: Add direct rule fs_cmd implementation
  2022-05-11 13:57 [bug report] net/mlx5: Add direct rule fs_cmd implementation Dan Carpenter
@ 2022-05-24 13:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Leon Romanovsky @ 2022-05-24 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: maorg, linux-rdma, Saeed Mahameed, linux-netdev

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 04:57:24PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> [ I was reviewing old use after free warnings and stumbled across this
>   one which still needs fixing - dan ]
> 
> Hello Maor Gottlieb,
> 
> The patch 6a48faeeca10: "net/mlx5: Add direct rule fs_cmd
> implementation" from Aug 20, 2019, leads to the following Smatch
> static checker warning:
> 
> 	drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/fs_dr.c:53 set_miss_action()
> 	warn: 'action' was already freed.
> 
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/steering/fs_dr.c
>     28 static int set_miss_action(struct mlx5_flow_root_namespace *ns,
>     29                            struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
>     30                            struct mlx5_flow_table *next_ft)
>     31 {
>     32         struct mlx5dr_action *old_miss_action;
>     33         struct mlx5dr_action *action = NULL;
>     34         struct mlx5dr_table *next_tbl;
>     35         int err;
>     36 
>     37         next_tbl = next_ft ? next_ft->fs_dr_table.dr_table : NULL;
>     38         if (next_tbl) {
>     39                 action = mlx5dr_action_create_dest_table(next_tbl);
>     40                 if (!action)
>     41                         return -EINVAL;
>     42         }
>     43         old_miss_action = ft->fs_dr_table.miss_action;
>     44         err = mlx5dr_table_set_miss_action(ft->fs_dr_table.dr_table, action);
>     45         if (err && action) {
>     46                 err = mlx5dr_action_destroy(action);
>     47                 if (err) {
>     48                         action = NULL;
>     49                         mlx5_core_err(ns->dev, "Failed to destroy action (%d)\n",
>     50                                       err);
>     51                 }
> 
> If "err" is zero then "action" is freed.
> 
>     52         }
> --> 53         ft->fs_dr_table.miss_action = action;
>                                              ^^^^^^
> Use after free.

Thanks for the report.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/7fe70bbb120422cc71e6b018531954d58ea2e61e.1653397057.git.leonro@nvidia.com/T/#u

> 
>     54         if (old_miss_action) {
>     55                 err = mlx5dr_action_destroy(old_miss_action);
>     56                 if (err)
>     57                         mlx5_core_err(ns->dev, "Failed to destroy action (%d)\n",
>     58                                       err);
>     59         }
>     60 
>     61         return err;
>     62 }
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-24 13:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-11 13:57 [bug report] net/mlx5: Add direct rule fs_cmd implementation Dan Carpenter
2022-05-24 13:01 ` Leon Romanovsky

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).