From: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Cc: ohad@wizery.com, loic.pallardy@st.com, peng.fan@nxp.com,
arnaud.pouliquen@st.com, fabien.dessenne@st.com,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] remoteproc: Call the right core function based on synchronisation state
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:10:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006ab94d-daf3-0e28-7098-982d473c00d5@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324214603.14979-10-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Hi Mathieu,
On 3/24/20 4:45 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Call the right core function based on whether we should synchronise
> with an MCU or boot it from scratch.
This patch does generate some checkpatch warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 36 +++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> index 73ea32df0156..5f711ceb97ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> @@ -106,38 +106,41 @@ static inline void rproc_set_mcu_sync_state(struct rproc *rproc,
> }
> }
>
> +#define RPROC_OPS_HELPER(__operation, ...) \
> + do { \
> + if (rproc_sync_with_mcu(rproc)) { \
So this does make the logic a bit convoluted, since you have three
different flags for rproc_sync_with_mcu, and you apply them in common
for all the ops. This is what I meant in my comment on Patch 1.
> + if (!rproc->sync_ops || \
> + !rproc->sync_ops->__operation) \
> + return 0; \
> + return rproc->sync_ops->__operation(__VA_ARGS__); \
Use the same semantics as the regular ops instead of two return
statements, the code should fallback to the common return 0 after the
RPROC_OPS_HELPER when neither of them are present.
regards
Suman
> + } else if (rproc->ops && rproc->ops->__operation) \
> + return rproc->ops->__operation(__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } while (0) \
> +
> static inline
> int rproc_fw_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> - if (rproc->ops->sanity_check)
> - return rproc->ops->sanity_check(rproc, fw);
> -
> + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(sanity_check, rproc, fw);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static inline
> u32 rproc_get_boot_addr(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> - if (rproc->ops->get_boot_addr)
> - return rproc->ops->get_boot_addr(rproc, fw);
> -
> + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(get_boot_addr, rproc, fw);
> return 0;
> }
>
> static inline
> int rproc_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> - if (rproc->ops->load)
> - return rproc->ops->load(rproc, fw);
> -
> + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(load, rproc, fw);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> static inline int rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> - if (rproc->ops->parse_fw)
> - return rproc->ops->parse_fw(rproc, fw);
> -
> + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(parse_fw, rproc, fw);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -145,10 +148,7 @@ static inline
> int rproc_handle_rsc(struct rproc *rproc, u32 rsc_type, void *rsc, int offset,
> int avail)
> {
> - if (rproc->ops->handle_rsc)
> - return rproc->ops->handle_rsc(rproc, rsc_type, rsc, offset,
> - avail);
> -
> + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(handle_rsc, rproc, rsc_type, rsc, offset, avail);
> return RSC_IGNORED;
> }
>
> @@ -156,9 +156,7 @@ static inline
> struct resource_table *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> const struct firmware *fw)
> {
> - if (rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table)
> - return rproc->ops->find_loaded_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> -
> + RPROC_OPS_HELPER(find_loaded_rsc_table, rproc, fw);
> return NULL;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-31 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 21:45 [PATCH v2 00/17] remoteproc: Add support for synchronisation with MCU Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] remoteproc: Add new operation and state machine for MCU synchronisation Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 22:46 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-30 22:49 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 21:38 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 21:38 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_set_mcu_sync_state() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 22:55 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 11:05 ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 19:47 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:58 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] remoteproc: Split rproc_ops " Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 19:54 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] remoteproc: Get rid of tedious error path Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 20:31 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_alloc_internals() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 11:10 ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 20:38 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 20:29 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 21:53 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 21:53 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-30 23:07 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] remoteproc: Introduce function rproc_alloc_state_machine() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 13:12 ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:10 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 20:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 18:35 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 18:35 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-30 23:13 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] remoteproc: Allocate synchronisation state machine Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 13:47 ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:16 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-30 23:20 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 20:46 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] remoteproc: Call the right core function based on synchronisation state Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 15:10 ` Suman Anna [this message]
2020-04-02 20:16 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 18:48 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 18:48 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] remoteproc: Decouple firmware load and remoteproc booting Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:27 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] remoteproc: Repurpose function rproc_trigger_auto_boot() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:32 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] remoteproc: Rename function rproc_fw_boot() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:42 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] remoteproc: Introducting new functions to start and stop an MCU Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 18:08 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-31 21:46 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_trigger_recovery() Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 21:52 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-02 20:35 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 19:02 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 19:02 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] remoteproc: Correctly deal with MCU synchronisation when changing FW image Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 13:50 ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:21 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 22:14 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 20:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-22 21:29 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-22 21:29 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-22 22:56 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-22 22:56 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] remoteproc: Correctly deal with MCU synchronisation when changing state Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 14:04 ` Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-30 23:49 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-31 22:35 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:29 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 20:55 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 20:55 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-02 20:42 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-09 20:40 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-09 20:40 ` Suman Anna
2020-03-24 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] remoteproc: Make MCU synchronisation state changes on stop and crashed Mathieu Poirier
2020-03-27 17:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] remoteproc: Add support for synchronisation with MCU Loic PALLARDY
2020-03-31 22:51 ` Suman Anna
2020-04-01 21:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=006ab94d-daf3-0e28-7098-982d473c00d5@ti.com \
--to=s-anna@ti.com \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=fabien.dessenne@st.com \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loic.pallardy@st.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).