linux-remoteproc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, ohad@wizery.com
Cc: s-anna@ti.com, elder@linaro.org, Markus.Elfring@web.de,
	linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:24:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e980e9e6-04d6-60b8-c921-d2fb1f2b9a1b@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415204858.2448-3-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On 4/15/20 10:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Make the firmware name allocation a function on its own in an
> effort to cleanup function rproc_alloc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 80056513ae71..4dee63f319ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1979,6 +1979,33 @@ static const struct device_type rproc_type = {
>  	.release	= rproc_type_release,
>  };
>  
> +static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				const char *name, const char *firmware)

nitpicking: here you do not allocate memory for the firmware but for its name
The name of the function seems to me quite confusing...

Else LGTM for the series

Thanks,

Arnaud

> +{
> +	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> +	int name_len;
> +
> +	if (!firmware) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> +		 * construct a default name.
> +		 */
> +		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> +		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> +	} else {
> +		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	rproc->firmware = p;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
>   * @dev: the underlying device
> @@ -2007,42 +2034,21 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  			  const char *firmware, int len)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc;
> -	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> -	int name_len;
>  
>  	if (!dev || !name || !ops)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (!firmware) {
> -		/*
> -		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> -		 * construct a default name.
> -		 */
> -		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> -		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> -	} else {
> -		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	rproc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rproc) + len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc) {
> -		kfree(p);
> +	if (!rproc)
>  		return NULL;
> -	}
> +
> +	if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> +		goto free_rproc;
>  
>  	rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc->ops) {
> -		kfree(p);
> -		kfree(rproc);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> +	if (!rproc->ops)
> +		goto free_firmware;
>  
> -	rproc->firmware = p;
>  	rproc->name = name;
>  	rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
>  	rproc->auto_boot = true;
> @@ -2091,6 +2097,12 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
>  
>  	return rproc;
> +
> +free_firmware:
> +	kfree(rproc->firmware);
> +free_rproc:
> +	kfree(rproc);
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_alloc);
>  
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	<bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: <s-anna@ti.com>, <elder@linaro.org>, <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc()
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:24:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e980e9e6-04d6-60b8-c921-d2fb1f2b9a1b@st.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20200420092412.7WfKmXn15pC5qlZOkTJCvCy8DQuvCXBa78Il3qp-DP4@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415204858.2448-3-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

Hi Mathieu,

On 4/15/20 10:48 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Make the firmware name allocation a function on its own in an
> effort to cleanup function rproc_alloc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 80056513ae71..4dee63f319ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1979,6 +1979,33 @@ static const struct device_type rproc_type = {
>  	.release	= rproc_type_release,
>  };
>  
> +static int rproc_alloc_firmware(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				const char *name, const char *firmware)

nitpicking: here you do not allocate memory for the firmware but for its name
The name of the function seems to me quite confusing...

Else LGTM for the series

Thanks,

Arnaud

> +{
> +	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> +	int name_len;
> +
> +	if (!firmware) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> +		 * construct a default name.
> +		 */
> +		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> +		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> +	} else {
> +		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!p)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	rproc->firmware = p;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
>   * @dev: the underlying device
> @@ -2007,42 +2034,21 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  			  const char *firmware, int len)
>  {
>  	struct rproc *rproc;
> -	char *p, *template = "rproc-%s-fw";
> -	int name_len;
>  
>  	if (!dev || !name || !ops)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> -	if (!firmware) {
> -		/*
> -		 * If the caller didn't pass in a firmware name then
> -		 * construct a default name.
> -		 */
> -		name_len = strlen(name) + strlen(template) - 2 + 1;
> -		p = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -		snprintf(p, name_len, template, name);
> -	} else {
> -		p = kstrdup(firmware, GFP_KERNEL);
> -		if (!p)
> -			return NULL;
> -	}
> -
>  	rproc = kzalloc(sizeof(struct rproc) + len, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc) {
> -		kfree(p);
> +	if (!rproc)
>  		return NULL;
> -	}
> +
> +	if (rproc_alloc_firmware(rproc, name, firmware))
> +		goto free_rproc;
>  
>  	rproc->ops = kmemdup(ops, sizeof(*ops), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!rproc->ops) {
> -		kfree(p);
> -		kfree(rproc);
> -		return NULL;
> -	}
> +	if (!rproc->ops)
> +		goto free_firmware;
>  
> -	rproc->firmware = p;
>  	rproc->name = name;
>  	rproc->priv = &rproc[1];
>  	rproc->auto_boot = true;
> @@ -2091,6 +2097,12 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>  	rproc->state = RPROC_OFFLINE;
>  
>  	return rproc;
> +
> +free_firmware:
> +	kfree(rproc->firmware);
> +free_rproc:
> +	kfree(rproc);
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_alloc);
>  
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 20:48 [PATCH v2 0/7] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] remoteproc: Fix IDR initialisation in rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 13:37   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:37     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-20  5:00   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:00     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] remoteproc: Split firmware name allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:28   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-15 21:28     ` Alex Elder
2020-04-20  5:09   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:09     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  9:24   ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2020-04-20  9:24     ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2020-04-20 21:29     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-20 21:29       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] remoteproc: Simplify default name allocation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:26   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-15 21:26     ` Alex Elder
2020-04-20  5:10   ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:10     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] remoteproc: Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrup() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:25   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-15 21:25     ` Alex Elder
2020-04-17 13:44     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:44       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-20  5:21       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:21         ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-17 16:12   ` [v2 4/7] remoteproc: Use kstrdup_const() rather than kstrdup() Markus Elfring
2020-04-17 16:12     ` Markus Elfring
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] remoteproc: Restructure firmware name allocation Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 21:23   ` Alex Elder
2020-04-15 21:23     ` Alex Elder
2020-04-20  5:17     ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-20  5:17       ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-04-16  6:26   ` Markus Elfring
2020-04-16  6:26     ` Markus Elfring
2020-04-17 13:39     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:39       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 15:48       ` [v2 " Markus Elfring
2020-04-17 15:48         ` Markus Elfring
2020-04-17 16:15         ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 16:15           ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 20:58         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 20:58           ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 21:28       ` [PATCH v2 " Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 21:28         ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] remoteproc: Split rproc_ops allocation from rproc_alloc() Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 13:49   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:49     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 15:35     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 15:35       ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 21:56     ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 21:56       ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] remoteproc: Get rid of tedious error path Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-15 20:48   ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-04-17 13:50   ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:50     ` Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] remoteproc: Refactor function rproc_alloc() Suman Anna
2020-04-17 13:34   ` Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e980e9e6-04d6-60b8-c921-d2fb1f2b9a1b@st.com \
    --to=arnaud.pouliquen@st.com \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=elder@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).