[PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Marek Vasut]

From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>

The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
so limit the DMA range to 32bit.

Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
---
NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
      discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
      RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
---
 drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
index c3eab0b95290..db2b16f40bc1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
@@ -1325,3 +1325,31 @@ static struct platform_driver rcar_pcie_driver = {
 	.probe = rcar_pcie_probe,
 };
 builtin_platform_driver(rcar_pcie_driver);
+
+static int rcar_pcie_pci_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+			    unsigned long action, void *data)
+{
+	struct device *dev = data;
+
+	switch (action) {
+	case BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER:
+		/* Force the DMA mask to lower 32-bits */
+		dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
+		break;
+	default:
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+	}
+
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block device_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = rcar_pcie_pci_notifier,
+};
+
+static int __init register_rcar_pcie_pci_notifier(void)
+{
+	return bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &device_nb);
+}
+
+arch_initcall(register_rcar_pcie_pci_notifier);
-- 
2.16.2

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>
> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.

Doing it in the driver is clearly not appropriate, we must do this in
common code. If I remember correctly, it's specifically ARM64 that is
broken here, it incorrectly allows setting a DMA mask to 64 bit
when that is not available.

      Arnd

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Marek Vasut]

On 05/22/2018 10:10 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>
>> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
>> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
>>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
>>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
> 
> Doing it in the driver is clearly not appropriate, we must do this in
> common code. If I remember correctly, it's specifically ARM64 that is
> broken here, it incorrectly allows setting a DMA mask to 64 bit
> when that is not available.

Yep, that's correct. ARM64 with devices mapping tremendous amounts of
memory. So did anything change since that discussion references in the NOTE?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Marek Vasut]

On 05/22/2018 11:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 10:10 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>
>>> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
>>> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>>> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
>>>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
>>>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
>>
>> Doing it in the driver is clearly not appropriate, we must do this in
>> common code. If I remember correctly, it's specifically ARM64 that is
>> broken here, it incorrectly allows setting a DMA mask to 64 bit
>> when that is not available.
> 
> Yep, that's correct. ARM64 with devices mapping tremendous amounts of
> memory. So did anything change since that discussion references in the NOTE?

Bump ? I think it'd be nice to sort this out once and for all, since I
doubt it's just this controller that has such a limitation.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Bjorn Helgaas]

[+cc ARM64 folks, linux-kernel]

The original patch under discussion is:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180521220514.30256-1-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:52:21AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 10:10 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> >>
> >> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
> >> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> >> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> >> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> >> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> >> ---
> >> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
> >>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
> >>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
> > 
> > Doing it in the driver is clearly not appropriate, we must do this in
> > common code. If I remember correctly, it's specifically ARM64 that is
> > broken here, it incorrectly allows setting a DMA mask to 64 bit
> > when that is not available.
> 
> Yep, that's correct. ARM64 with devices mapping tremendous amounts of
> memory. So did anything change since that discussion references in the NOTE?
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Will Deacon]

On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 05:30:48PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc ARM64 folks, linux-kernel]
> 
> The original patch under discussion is:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180521220514.30256-1-marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com
> 
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:52:21AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On 05/22/2018 10:10 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> > >>
> > >> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
> > >> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> > >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > >> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> > >> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > >> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> > >> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > >> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > >> ---
> > >> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
> > >>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
> > >>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
> > > 
> > > Doing it in the driver is clearly not appropriate, we must do this in
> > > common code. If I remember correctly, it's specifically ARM64 that is
> > > broken here, it incorrectly allows setting a DMA mask to 64 bit
> > > when that is not available.
> > 
> > Yep, that's correct. ARM64 with devices mapping tremendous amounts of
> > memory. So did anything change since that discussion references in the NOTE?

Is it specifically arm64 that's broken here? If so, why and how do other
archs (e.g. riscv) handle this? I thought all of this behaviour was driven
by the DMA ops, and we're just using generic code for that afaict.

Will

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Lorenzo Pieralisi]

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05:14AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> 
> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
> ---
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

The issue solved by this patch was solved in a more generic way through
this series:

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-July/028792.html

I will therefore drop this patch from the PCI patch queue.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> index c3eab0b95290..db2b16f40bc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -1325,3 +1325,31 @@ static struct platform_driver rcar_pcie_driver = {
>  	.probe = rcar_pcie_probe,
>  };
>  builtin_platform_driver(rcar_pcie_driver);
> +
> +static int rcar_pcie_pci_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +			    unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = data;
> +
> +	switch (action) {
> +	case BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER:
> +		/* Force the DMA mask to lower 32-bits */
> +		dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +	}
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block device_nb = {
> +	.notifier_call = rcar_pcie_pci_notifier,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init register_rcar_pcie_pci_notifier(void)
> +{
> +	return bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &device_nb);
> +}
> +
> +arch_initcall(register_rcar_pcie_pci_notifier);
> -- 
> 2.16.2
> 

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1485 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:15:55AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05:14AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> > 
> > The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
> > so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
> > Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> > Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> > NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
> >       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
> >       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> The issue solved by this patch was solved in a more generic way through
> this series:
> 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-July/028792.html
> 
> I will therefore drop this patch from the PCI patch queue.

Cool. Thanks for this series and thanks for the heads up!

Marek, can you confirm our issue is fixed (if you haven't done already)?


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Marek Vasut]

On 09/18/2018 12:51 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:15:55AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05:14AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>
>>> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
>>> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>>> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>>> ---
>>> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
>>>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
>>>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> The issue solved by this patch was solved in a more generic way through
>> this series:
>>
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-July/028792.html
>>
>> I will therefore drop this patch from the PCI patch queue.
> 
> Cool. Thanks for this series and thanks for the heads up!
> 
> Marek, can you confirm our issue is fixed (if you haven't done already)?

I assembled a setup with NVMe controller, which should be triggering
this issue according to [1], but I'm not having much success getting it
to work with or without this patchset. Logs are below, nvme smart-log
seems to produce completely bogus results, although the device is at
least recognized.

Maybe there's something else that's broken ?

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/

# dmesg | egrep '(pci|nvm)'
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@fe000000 ranges:
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: Parsing ranges property...
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:    IO 0xfe100000..0xfe1fffff -> 0x00000000
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0xfe200000..0xfe3fffff -> 0xfe200000
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0x30000000..0x37ffffff -> 0x30000000
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0x38000000..0x3fffffff -> 0x38000000
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: PCIe x1: link up
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: Current link speed is 5 GT/s
rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe3fffff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x30000000-0x37ffffff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x38000000-0x3fffffff pref]
pci_bus 0000:00: scanning bus
pci 0000:00:00.0: [1912:0025] type 01 class 0x060400
pci 0000:00:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# disabled
pci_bus 0000:00: fixups for bus
pci 0000:00:00.0: scanning [bus 01-01] behind bridge, pass 0
pci 0000:00:00.0: scanning [bus 00-00] behind bridge, pass 1
pci_bus 0000:01: scanning bus
pci 0000:01:00.0: [8086:f1a5] type 00 class 0x010802
pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
pci 0000:01:00.0: 4.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 5 GT/s
x1 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8 GT/s x4 link)
pci_bus 0000:01: fixups for bus
pci_bus 0000:01: bus scan returning with max=01
pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-ff] end is updated to 01
pci_bus 0000:00: bus scan returning with max=01
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe2fffff]
pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe203fff 64bit]
pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe2fffff]
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: assign IRQ: got 0
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling bus mastering
pcieport 0000:00:00.0: Signaling PME with IRQ 198
rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@ee800000 ranges:
rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: Parsing ranges property...
rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:    IO 0xee900000..0xee9fffff -> 0x00000000
rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xeea00000..0xeebfffff -> 0xeea00000
rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xc0000000..0xc7ffffff -> 0xc0000000
rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xc8000000..0xcfffffff -> 0xc8000000
rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: PCIe link down
nvme 0000:01:00.0: assign IRQ: got 171
nvme nvme0: pci function 0000:01:00.0
nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling bus mastering
nvme nvme0: Shutdown timeout set to 60 seconds

# lspci -nvvvs 01:00.0
01:00.0 0108: 8086:f1a5 (rev 03) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
        Subsystem: 8086:390a
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 171
        Region 0: Memory at fe200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
        Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
                Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
                Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
        Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
                DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
unlimited, L1 unlimited
                        ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+
SlotPowerLimit 0.000W
                DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+
Unsupported+
                        RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
FLReset-
                        MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
                DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+
TransPend-
                LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x4, ASPM L1, Exit
Latency L0s <1us, L1 <8us
                        ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
                LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk-
                        ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
                LnkSta: Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+
DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
                DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+,
LTR+, OBFF Via message
                DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-,
LTR-, OBFF Disabled
                LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 8GT/s, EnterCompliance-
SpeedDis-
                         Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range,
EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
                         Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
                LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB,
EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
                         EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-,
LinkEqualizationRequest-
        Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=16 Masked-
                Vector table: BAR=0 offset=00002000
                PBA: BAR=0 offset=00002100
        Capabilities: [100 v2] Advanced Error Reporting
                UESta:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq+ ACSViol-
                UEMsk:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
                UESvrt: DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
                CESta:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout-
NonFatalErr-
                CEMsk:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout-
NonFatalErr+
                AERCap: First Error Pointer: 14, GenCap+ CGenEn- ChkCap+
ChkEn-
        Capabilities: [158 v1] #19
        Capabilities: [178 v1] Latency Tolerance Reporting
                Max snoop latency: 0ns
                Max no snoop latency: 0ns
        Capabilities: [180 v1] L1 PM Substates
                L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+
ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
                          PortCommonModeRestoreTime=10us
PortTPowerOnTime=10us
                L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2- ASPM_L1.1-
                           T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
                L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
        Kernel driver in use: nvme
lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -12

# nvme smart-log /dev/nvme0
Smart Log for NVME device:nvme0 namespace-id:ffffffff
critical_warning                    : 0
temperature                         : -273 C
available_spare                     : 0%
available_spare_threshold           : 0%
percentage_used                     : 0%
data_units_read                     : 0
data_units_written                  : 0
host_read_commands                  : 0
host_write_commands                 : 0
controller_busy_time                : 0
power_cycles                        : 0
power_on_hours                      : 0
unsafe_shutdowns                    : 0
media_errors                        : 0
num_err_log_entries                 : 0
Warning Temperature Time            : 0
Critical Composite Temperature Time : 0
Thermal Management T1 Trans Count   : 0
Thermal Management T2 Trans Count   : 0
Thermal Management T1 Total Time    : 0
Thermal Management T2 Total Time    : 0


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Marek Vasut]

On 09/22/2018 07:06 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 09/18/2018 12:51 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:15:55AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05:14AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>>
>>>> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
>>>> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>>>> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>>>> ---
>>>> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
>>>>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
>>>>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> The issue solved by this patch was solved in a more generic way through
>>> this series:
>>>
>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-July/028792.html
>>>
>>> I will therefore drop this patch from the PCI patch queue.
>>
>> Cool. Thanks for this series and thanks for the heads up!
>>
>> Marek, can you confirm our issue is fixed (if you haven't done already)?
> 
> I assembled a setup with NVMe controller, which should be triggering
> this issue according to [1], but I'm not having much success getting it
> to work with or without this patchset. Logs are below, nvme smart-log
> seems to produce completely bogus results, although the device is at
> least recognized.
> 
> Maybe there's something else that's broken ?
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/
> 
> # dmesg | egrep '(pci|nvm)'
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@fe000000 ranges:
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: Parsing ranges property...
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:    IO 0xfe100000..0xfe1fffff -> 0x00000000
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0xfe200000..0xfe3fffff -> 0xfe200000
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0x30000000..0x37ffffff -> 0x30000000
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0x38000000..0x3fffffff -> 0x38000000
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: PCIe x1: link up
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: Current link speed is 5 GT/s
> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe3fffff]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x30000000-0x37ffffff]
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x38000000-0x3fffffff pref]
> pci_bus 0000:00: scanning bus
> pci 0000:00:00.0: [1912:0025] type 01 class 0x060400
> pci 0000:00:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# disabled
> pci_bus 0000:00: fixups for bus
> pci 0000:00:00.0: scanning [bus 01-01] behind bridge, pass 0
> pci 0000:00:00.0: scanning [bus 00-00] behind bridge, pass 1
> pci_bus 0000:01: scanning bus
> pci 0000:01:00.0: [8086:f1a5] type 00 class 0x010802
> pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: 4.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 5 GT/s
> x1 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8 GT/s x4 link)
> pci_bus 0000:01: fixups for bus
> pci_bus 0000:01: bus scan returning with max=01
> pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-ff] end is updated to 01
> pci_bus 0000:00: bus scan returning with max=01
> pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe2fffff]
> pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe203fff 64bit]
> pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
> pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe2fffff]
> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: assign IRQ: got 0
> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling bus mastering
> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: Signaling PME with IRQ 198
> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@ee800000 ranges:
> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: Parsing ranges property...
> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:    IO 0xee900000..0xee9fffff -> 0x00000000
> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xeea00000..0xeebfffff -> 0xeea00000
> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xc0000000..0xc7ffffff -> 0xc0000000
> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xc8000000..0xcfffffff -> 0xc8000000
> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: PCIe link down
> nvme 0000:01:00.0: assign IRQ: got 171
> nvme nvme0: pci function 0000:01:00.0
> nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling bus mastering
> nvme nvme0: Shutdown timeout set to 60 seconds
> 
> # lspci -nvvvs 01:00.0
> 01:00.0 0108: 8086:f1a5 (rev 03) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>         Subsystem: 8086:390a
>         Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
>         Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Latency: 0
>         Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 171
>         Region 0: Memory at fe200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
>         Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
>                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
>                 Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>         Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
>                 DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
> unlimited, L1 unlimited
>                         ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+
> SlotPowerLimit 0.000W
>                 DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+
> Unsupported+
>                         RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
> FLReset-
>                         MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
>                 DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+
> TransPend-
>                 LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x4, ASPM L1, Exit
> Latency L0s <1us, L1 <8us
>                         ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
>                 LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk-
>                         ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
>                 LnkSta: Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+
> DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
>                 DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+,
> LTR+, OBFF Via message
>                 DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-,
> LTR-, OBFF Disabled
>                 LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 8GT/s, EnterCompliance-
> SpeedDis-
>                          Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range,
> EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
>                          Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
>                 LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB,
> EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
>                          EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-,
> LinkEqualizationRequest-
>         Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=16 Masked-
>                 Vector table: BAR=0 offset=00002000
>                 PBA: BAR=0 offset=00002100
>         Capabilities: [100 v2] Advanced Error Reporting
>                 UESta:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
> UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq+ ACSViol-
>                 UEMsk:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
> UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
>                 UESvrt: DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
> UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
>                 CESta:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout-
> NonFatalErr-
>                 CEMsk:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout-
> NonFatalErr+
>                 AERCap: First Error Pointer: 14, GenCap+ CGenEn- ChkCap+
> ChkEn-
>         Capabilities: [158 v1] #19
>         Capabilities: [178 v1] Latency Tolerance Reporting
>                 Max snoop latency: 0ns
>                 Max no snoop latency: 0ns
>         Capabilities: [180 v1] L1 PM Substates
>                 L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+
> ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
>                           PortCommonModeRestoreTime=10us
> PortTPowerOnTime=10us
>                 L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2- ASPM_L1.1-
>                            T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
>                 L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
>         Kernel driver in use: nvme
> lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -12
> 
> # nvme smart-log /dev/nvme0
> Smart Log for NVME device:nvme0 namespace-id:ffffffff
> critical_warning                    : 0
> temperature                         : -273 C
> available_spare                     : 0%
> available_spare_threshold           : 0%
> percentage_used                     : 0%
> data_units_read                     : 0
> data_units_written                  : 0
> host_read_commands                  : 0
> host_write_commands                 : 0
> controller_busy_time                : 0
> power_cycles                        : 0
> power_on_hours                      : 0
> unsafe_shutdowns                    : 0
> media_errors                        : 0
> num_err_log_entries                 : 0
> Warning Temperature Time            : 0
> Critical Composite Temperature Time : 0
> Thermal Management T1 Trans Count   : 0
> Thermal Management T2 Trans Count   : 0
> Thermal Management T1 Total Time    : 0
> Thermal Management T2 Total Time    : 0

Any suggestions ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut

Re: [PATCH][RFC] PCI: rcar: Add bus notifier so we can limit the DMA range

[Marek Vasut]

On 10/2/18 12:44 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 09/22/2018 07:06 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 09/18/2018 12:51 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:15:55AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:05:14AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> From: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The PCIe DMA controller on RCar Gen2 and earlier is on 32bit bus,
>>>>> so limit the DMA range to 32bit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@gmail.com>
>>>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>>>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>
>>>>> Cc: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>>>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
>>>>> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
>>>>> ---
>>>>> NOTE: I'm aware of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/ , but the
>>>>>       discussion seems to have gone way off, so I'm sending this as a
>>>>>       RFC. Any feedback on how to do this limiting properly would be nice.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> The issue solved by this patch was solved in a more generic way through
>>>> this series:
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-July/028792.html
>>>>
>>>> I will therefore drop this patch from the PCI patch queue.
>>>
>>> Cool. Thanks for this series and thanks for the heads up!
>>>
>>> Marek, can you confirm our issue is fixed (if you haven't done already)?
>>
>> I assembled a setup with NVMe controller, which should be triggering
>> this issue according to [1], but I'm not having much success getting it
>> to work with or without this patchset. Logs are below, nvme smart-log
>> seems to produce completely bogus results, although the device is at
>> least recognized.
>>
>> Maybe there's something else that's broken ?
>>
>> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9495895/
>>
>> # dmesg | egrep '(pci|nvm)'
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@fe000000 ranges:
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: Parsing ranges property...
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:    IO 0xfe100000..0xfe1fffff -> 0x00000000
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0xfe200000..0xfe3fffff -> 0xfe200000
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0x30000000..0x37ffffff -> 0x30000000
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie:   MEM 0x38000000..0x3fffffff -> 0x38000000
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: PCIe x1: link up
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: Current link speed is 5 GT/s
>> rcar-pcie fe000000.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io  0x0000-0xfffff]
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe3fffff]
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x30000000-0x37ffffff]
>> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x38000000-0x3fffffff pref]
>> pci_bus 0000:00: scanning bus
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: [1912:0025] type 01 class 0x060400
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: PME# disabled
>> pci_bus 0000:00: fixups for bus
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: scanning [bus 01-01] behind bridge, pass 0
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: scanning [bus 00-00] behind bridge, pass 1
>> pci_bus 0000:01: scanning bus
>> pci 0000:01:00.0: [8086:f1a5] type 00 class 0x010802
>> pci 0000:01:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x00000000-0x00003fff 64bit]
>> pci 0000:01:00.0: 4.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 5 GT/s
>> x1 link at 0000:00:00.0 (capable of 31.504 Gb/s with 8 GT/s x4 link)
>> pci_bus 0000:01: fixups for bus
>> pci_bus 0000:01: bus scan returning with max=01
>> pci_bus 0000:01: busn_res: [bus 01-ff] end is updated to 01
>> pci_bus 0000:00: bus scan returning with max=01
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 14: assigned [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe2fffff]
>> pci 0000:01:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe203fff 64bit]
>> pci 0000:00:00.0: PCI bridge to [bus 01]
>> pci 0000:00:00.0:   bridge window [mem 0xfe200000-0xfe2fffff]
>> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: assign IRQ: got 0
>> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: enabling bus mastering
>> pcieport 0000:00:00.0: Signaling PME with IRQ 198
>> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: host bridge /soc/pcie@ee800000 ranges:
>> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: Parsing ranges property...
>> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:    IO 0xee900000..0xee9fffff -> 0x00000000
>> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xeea00000..0xeebfffff -> 0xeea00000
>> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xc0000000..0xc7ffffff -> 0xc0000000
>> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie:   MEM 0xc8000000..0xcfffffff -> 0xc8000000
>> rcar-pcie ee800000.pcie: PCIe link down
>> nvme 0000:01:00.0: assign IRQ: got 171
>> nvme nvme0: pci function 0000:01:00.0
>> nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>> nvme 0000:01:00.0: enabling bus mastering
>> nvme nvme0: Shutdown timeout set to 60 seconds
>>
>> # lspci -nvvvs 01:00.0
>> 01:00.0 0108: 8086:f1a5 (rev 03) (prog-if 02 [NVM Express])
>>         Subsystem: 8086:390a
>>         Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
>> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
>>         Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>>         Latency: 0
>>         Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 171
>>         Region 0: Memory at fe200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
>>         Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
>>                 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
>> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
>>                 Status: D0 NoSoftRst- PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
>>         Capabilities: [70] Express (v2) Endpoint, MSI 00
>>                 DevCap: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, Latency L0s
>> unlimited, L1 unlimited
>>                         ExtTag- AttnBtn- AttnInd- PwrInd- RBE+ FLReset+
>> SlotPowerLimit 0.000W
>>                 DevCtl: Report errors: Correctable+ Non-Fatal+ Fatal+
>> Unsupported+
>>                         RlxdOrd+ ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop-
>> FLReset-
>>                         MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 512 bytes
>>                 DevSta: CorrErr- UncorrErr- FatalErr- UnsuppReq- AuxPwr+
>> TransPend-
>>                 LnkCap: Port #0, Speed 8GT/s, Width x4, ASPM L1, Exit
>> Latency L0s <1us, L1 <8us
>>                         ClockPM+ Surprise- LLActRep- BwNot- ASPMOptComp+
>>                 LnkCtl: ASPM Disabled; RCB 64 bytes Disabled- CommClk-
>>                         ExtSynch- ClockPM- AutWidDis- BWInt- AutBWInt-
>>                 LnkSta: Speed 5GT/s, Width x1, TrErr- Train- SlotClk+
>> DLActive- BWMgmt- ABWMgmt-
>>                 DevCap2: Completion Timeout: Range ABCD, TimeoutDis+,
>> LTR+, OBFF Via message
>>                 DevCtl2: Completion Timeout: 50us to 50ms, TimeoutDis-,
>> LTR-, OBFF Disabled
>>                 LnkCtl2: Target Link Speed: 8GT/s, EnterCompliance-
>> SpeedDis-
>>                          Transmit Margin: Normal Operating Range,
>> EnterModifiedCompliance- ComplianceSOS-
>>                          Compliance De-emphasis: -6dB
>>                 LnkSta2: Current De-emphasis Level: -6dB,
>> EqualizationComplete-, EqualizationPhase1-
>>                          EqualizationPhase2-, EqualizationPhase3-,
>> LinkEqualizationRequest-
>>         Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=16 Masked-
>>                 Vector table: BAR=0 offset=00002000
>>                 PBA: BAR=0 offset=00002100
>>         Capabilities: [100 v2] Advanced Error Reporting
>>                 UESta:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
>> UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq+ ACSViol-
>>                 UEMsk:  DLP- SDES- TLP- FCP- CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
>> UnxCmplt- RxOF- MalfTLP- ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
>>                 UESvrt: DLP+ SDES+ TLP- FCP+ CmpltTO- CmpltAbrt-
>> UnxCmplt- RxOF+ MalfTLP+ ECRC- UnsupReq- ACSViol-
>>                 CESta:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout-
>> NonFatalErr-
>>                 CEMsk:  RxErr- BadTLP- BadDLLP- Rollover- Timeout-
>> NonFatalErr+
>>                 AERCap: First Error Pointer: 14, GenCap+ CGenEn- ChkCap+
>> ChkEn-
>>         Capabilities: [158 v1] #19
>>         Capabilities: [178 v1] Latency Tolerance Reporting
>>                 Max snoop latency: 0ns
>>                 Max no snoop latency: 0ns
>>         Capabilities: [180 v1] L1 PM Substates
>>                 L1SubCap: PCI-PM_L1.2+ PCI-PM_L1.1+ ASPM_L1.2+
>> ASPM_L1.1+ L1_PM_Substates+
>>                           PortCommonModeRestoreTime=10us
>> PortTPowerOnTime=10us
>>                 L1SubCtl1: PCI-PM_L1.2- PCI-PM_L1.1- ASPM_L1.2- ASPM_L1.1-
>>                            T_CommonMode=0us LTR1.2_Threshold=0ns
>>                 L1SubCtl2: T_PwrOn=10us
>>         Kernel driver in use: nvme
>> lspci: Unable to load libkmod resources: error -12
>>
>> # nvme smart-log /dev/nvme0
>> Smart Log for NVME device:nvme0 namespace-id:ffffffff
>> critical_warning                    : 0
>> temperature                         : -273 C
>> available_spare                     : 0%
>> available_spare_threshold           : 0%
>> percentage_used                     : 0%
>> data_units_read                     : 0
>> data_units_written                  : 0
>> host_read_commands                  : 0
>> host_write_commands                 : 0
>> controller_busy_time                : 0
>> power_cycles                        : 0
>> power_on_hours                      : 0
>> unsafe_shutdowns                    : 0
>> media_errors                        : 0
>> num_err_log_entries                 : 0
>> Warning Temperature Time            : 0
>> Critical Composite Temperature Time : 0
>> Thermal Management T1 Trans Count   : 0
>> Thermal Management T2 Trans Count   : 0
>> Thermal Management T1 Total Time    : 0
>> Thermal Management T2 Total Time    : 0
> 
> Any suggestions ?

Thank you for all your suggestions and support!

I revisited this issue with current linux-next, since I was curious why
the NVME SSD didn't work for me on ARM64, while it works on x86-64. It
still doesn't work on ARM64 and I still don't know why.

I limited the link speed to 2.5GT/s x1, but that doesn't help.

I suspect the problem is with the 64bit mapping of the BAR0, while the
controller has the 32bit DMA limitation. I tried Intel i210 NIC and
Intel 82574L NIC and they both work fine, but they only map BAR0 as
32bit. Could that be the problem ? I was under the impression that this
patch should address it.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut