From: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Add support for hardware trip points
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:26:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ysa033e3BnH+wVBM@oden.dyn.berto.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2605a591-abf9-01ca-015c-efc3978803b8@linaro.org>
Hi Daniel,
On 2022-07-07 11:55:55 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Thanks for double checking and confirming. I've a patch removing this code,
> no need to send one. I'll submit it along with other changes around this.
> Perhaps, I'll try a revert before, it would make more sense.
Thanks.
To be clear I don't think we should revert commit 47cf09e0f4fc5120
("thermal/drivers/rcar_gen3_thermal: Add support for hardware trip
points"). Only remove the 4 lines it adds to rcar_gen3_thermal_resume()
as they are redundant. Does this match your view of the revert?
>
> Do you think the 'revert' should be backported ?
I have no strong opinion, I think it's a matter of risk :-)
There is no real harm in writing the trip points to hardware twice
during resume. On the other hand if we *know* the thermal core in the
backported kernel will always call set_trips() after the device is
resumed, then there is no harm in removing it.
--
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-07 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-04 9:18 [PATCH v2 0/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Add support for trip points Niklas Söderlund
2021-08-04 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Add support for hardware " Niklas Söderlund
2022-07-06 11:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-07 9:51 ` Niklas Söderlund
2022-07-07 9:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
2022-07-07 10:26 ` Niklas Söderlund [this message]
2022-07-07 12:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-08-04 9:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] thermal: rcar_gen3_thermal: Store TSC id as unsigned int Niklas Söderlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ysa033e3BnH+wVBM@oden.dyn.berto.se \
--to=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).