linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Mao Han <han_mao@c-sky.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf tools: avoid sample_reg_masks being const + weak
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 14:31:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191008123104.GA16241@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001003623.255186-1-irogers@google.com>

On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 05:36:23PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Being const + weak breaks with some compilers that constant-propagate
> from the weak symbol. This behavior is outside of the specification, but
> in LLVM is chosen to match GCC's behavior.
> 
> LLVM's implementation was set in this patch:
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f49573d1eedcf1e44893d5a062ac1b72c8419646
> A const + weak symbol is set to be weak_odr:
> https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html
> ODR is one definition rule, and given there is one constant definition
> constant-propagation is possible. It is possible to get this code to
> miscompile with LLVM when applying link time optimization. As compilers
> become more aggressive, this is likely to break in more instances.

is this just aprecaution or you actualy saw some breakage?

> 
> Move the definition of sample_reg_masks to the conditional part of
> perf_regs.h and guard usage with HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT. This avoids the
> weak symbol.
> 
> Fix an issue when HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT isn't defined from patch v1.
> In v3, add perf_regs.c for architectures that HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT but
> don't declare sample_regs_masks.

looks good to me (again ;-)), let's see if it passes Arnaldo's farm

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/arch/arm/util/Build         | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c   | 6 ++++++
>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build       | 1 +
>  tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
>  tools/perf/arch/csky/util/Build        | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c  | 6 ++++++
>  tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/Build       | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
>  tools/perf/arch/s390/util/Build        | 1 +
>  tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c  | 6 ++++++
>  tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c   | 8 ++++++--
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c            | 4 ----
>  tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h            | 4 ++--
>  13 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/Build
> index 296f0eac5e18..37fc63708966 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/Build
> @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
> +perf-y += perf_regs.o
> +
>  perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-regs.o
>  
>  perf-$(CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND)    += unwind-libunwind.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2864e2e3776d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
> +
> +const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> +	SMPL_REG_END
> +};
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> index 3cde540d2fcf..0a7782c61209 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  perf-y += header.o
> +perf-y += perf_regs.o
>  perf-y += sym-handling.o
>  perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF)     += dwarf-regs.o
>  perf-$(CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND) += unwind-libunwind.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2864e2e3776d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
> +
> +const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> +	SMPL_REG_END
> +};
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/Build
> index 1160bb2332ba..7d3050134ae0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/Build
> @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
> +perf-y += perf_regs.o
> +
>  perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-regs.o
>  perf-$(CONFIG_LIBDW_DWARF_UNWIND) += unwind-libdw.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2864e2e3776d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/csky/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
> +
> +const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> +	SMPL_REG_END
> +};
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/Build
> index 1160bb2332ba..7d3050134ae0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/Build
> @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
> +perf-y += perf_regs.o
> +
>  perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-regs.o
>  perf-$(CONFIG_LIBDW_DWARF_UNWIND) += unwind-libdw.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2864e2e3776d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/riscv/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
> +
> +const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> +	SMPL_REG_END
> +};
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/Build
> index 22797f043b84..3d9d0f4f72ca 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/Build
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  perf-y += header.o
>  perf-y += kvm-stat.o
> +perf-y += perf_regs.o
>  
>  perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-regs.o
>  perf-$(CONFIG_LIBDW_DWARF_UNWIND) += unwind-libdw.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2864e2e3776d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/s390/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include "../../util/perf_regs.h"
> +
> +const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> +	SMPL_REG_END
> +};
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
> index ef46c2848808..e687497b3aac 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-regs-options.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static int
>  __parse_regs(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int unset, bool intr)
>  {
>  	uint64_t *mode = (uint64_t *)opt->value;
> -	const struct sample_reg *r;
> +	const struct sample_reg *r = NULL;
>  	char *s, *os = NULL, *p;
>  	int ret = -1;
>  	uint64_t mask;
> @@ -46,19 +46,23 @@ __parse_regs(const struct option *opt, const char *str, int unset, bool intr)
>  
>  			if (!strcmp(s, "?")) {
>  				fprintf(stderr, "available registers: ");
> +#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
>  				for (r = sample_reg_masks; r->name; r++) {
>  					if (r->mask & mask)
>  						fprintf(stderr, "%s ", r->name);
>  				}
> +#endif
>  				fputc('\n', stderr);
>  				/* just printing available regs */
>  				return -1;
>  			}
> +#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
>  			for (r = sample_reg_masks; r->name; r++) {
>  				if ((r->mask & mask) && !strcasecmp(s, r->name))
>  					break;
>  			}
> -			if (!r->name) {
> +#endif
> +			if (!r || !r->name) {
>  				ui__warning("Unknown register \"%s\", check man page or run \"perf record %s?\"\n",
>  					    s, intr ? "-I" : "--user-regs=");
>  				goto error;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> index 2774cec1f15f..5ee47ae1509c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -3,10 +3,6 @@
>  #include "perf_regs.h"
>  #include "event.h"
>  
> -const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
> -	SMPL_REG_END
> -};
> -
>  int __weak arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op __maybe_unused,
>  				 char **new_op __maybe_unused)
>  {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> index 47fe34e5f7d5..e014c2c038f4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
> @@ -15,8 +15,6 @@ struct sample_reg {
>  #define SMPL_REG2(n, b) { .name = #n, .mask = 3ULL << (b) }
>  #define SMPL_REG_END { .name = NULL }
>  
> -extern const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[];
> -
>  enum {
>  	SDT_ARG_VALID = 0,
>  	SDT_ARG_SKIP,
> @@ -27,6 +25,8 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void);
>  uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void);
>  
>  #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
> +extern const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[];
> +
>  #include <perf_regs.h>
>  
>  #define DWARF_MINIMAL_REGS ((1ULL << PERF_REG_IP) | (1ULL << PERF_REG_SP))
> -- 
> 2.23.0.444.g18eeb5a265-goog
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-08 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20190927214341.170683-1-irogers@google.com>
2019-10-01  0:36 ` [PATCH v3] perf tools: avoid sample_reg_masks being const + weak Ian Rogers
2019-10-07 20:49   ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-08 12:31   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-10-09 23:07     ` Ian Rogers
2019-10-10 12:29       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-10-15  5:31   ` [tip: perf/core] perf tools: Avoid 'sample_reg_masks' " tip-bot2 for Ian Rogers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191008123104.GA16241@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=han_mao@c-sky.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@sifive.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).