linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Nick Kossifidis <mick@ics.forth.gr>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] RISC-V: Do not allocate memblock while iterating reserved memblocks
Date: Thu,  7 Jan 2021 01:26:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210107092652.3438696-2-atish.patra@wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107092652.3438696-1-atish.patra@wdc.com>

Currently, resource tree allocates memory blocks while iterating on the
list. It leads to following kernel warning because memblock allocation
also invokes memory block reservation API.

[    0.000000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/resource.c:795
__insert_resource+0x8e/0xd0
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted
5.10.0-00022-ge20097fb37e2-dirty #549
[    0.000000] epc: c00125c2 ra : c001262c sp : c1c01f50
[    0.000000]  gp : c1d456e0 tp : c1c0a980 t0 : ffffcf20
[    0.000000]  t1 : 00000000 t2 : 00000000 s0 : c1c01f60
[    0.000000]  s1 : ffffcf00 a0 : ffffff00 a1 : c1c0c0c4
[    0.000000]  a2 : 80c12b15 a3 : 80402000 a4 : 80402000
[    0.000000]  a5 : c1c0c0c4 a6 : 80c12b15 a7 : f5faf600
[    0.000000]  s2 : c1c0c0c4 s3 : c1c0e000 s4 : c1009a80
[    0.000000]  s5 : c1c0c000 s6 : c1d48000 s7 : c1613b4c
[    0.000000]  s8 : 00000fff s9 : 80000200 s10: c1613b40
[    0.000000]  s11: 00000000 t3 : c1d4a000 t4 : ffffffff

This is also unnecessary as we can pre-compute the total memblocks required
for each memory region and allocate it before the loop. It save precious
boot time not going through memblock allocation code every time.

Fixes: 00ab027a3b82 ("RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree")

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
index 1d85e9bf783c..3fa3f26dde85 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c
@@ -127,7 +127,9 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 {
 	struct memblock_region *region = NULL;
 	struct resource *res = NULL;
-	int ret = 0;
+	struct resource *mem_res = NULL;
+	size_t mem_res_sz = 0;
+	int ret = 0, i = 0;
 
 	code_res.start = __pa_symbol(_text);
 	code_res.end = __pa_symbol(_etext) - 1;
@@ -145,16 +147,17 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 	bss_res.end = __pa_symbol(__bss_stop) - 1;
 	bss_res.flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
 
+	mem_res_sz = (memblock.memory.cnt + memblock.reserved.cnt) * sizeof(*mem_res);
+	mem_res = memblock_alloc(mem_res_sz, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
+	if (!mem_res)
+		panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__, mem_res_sz);
 	/*
 	 * Start by adding the reserved regions, if they overlap
 	 * with /memory regions, insert_resource later on will take
 	 * care of it.
 	 */
 	for_each_reserved_mem_region(region) {
-		res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-		if (!res)
-			panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
-			      sizeof(struct resource));
+		res = &mem_res[i++];
 
 		res->name = "Reserved";
 		res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
@@ -171,8 +174,10 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 		 * Ignore any other reserved regions within
 		 * system memory.
 		 */
-		if (memblock_is_memory(res->start))
+		if (memblock_is_memory(res->start)) {
+			memblock_free((phys_addr_t) res, sizeof(struct resource));
 			continue;
+		}
 
 		ret = add_resource(&iomem_resource, res);
 		if (ret < 0)
@@ -181,10 +186,7 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 
 	/* Add /memory regions to the resource tree */
 	for_each_mem_region(region) {
-		res = memblock_alloc(sizeof(struct resource), SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
-		if (!res)
-			panic("%s: Failed to allocate %zu bytes\n", __func__,
-			      sizeof(struct resource));
+		res = &mem_res[i++];
 
 		if (unlikely(memblock_is_nomap(region))) {
 			res->name = "Reserved";
@@ -205,9 +207,9 @@ static void __init init_resources(void)
 	return;
 
  error:
-	memblock_free((phys_addr_t) res, sizeof(struct resource));
 	/* Better an empty resource tree than an inconsistent one */
 	release_child_resources(&iomem_resource);
+	memblock_free((phys_addr_t) mem_res, mem_res_sz);
 }
 
 
-- 
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-07  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-07  9:26 [PATCH 0/4] Assorted fixes for RV32 Atish Patra
2021-01-07  9:26 ` Atish Patra [this message]
2021-01-08 16:25   ` [PATCH 1/4] RISC-V: Do not allocate memblock while iterating reserved memblocks Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-11  3:54   ` Anup Patel
2021-01-07  9:26 ` [PATCH 2/4] RISC-V: Set current memblock limit Atish Patra
2021-01-11  3:58   ` Anup Patel
2021-01-11 19:20     ` Atish Patra
2021-01-07  9:26 ` [PATCH 3/4] RISC-V: Fix L1_CACHE_BYTES for RV32 Atish Patra
2021-01-08 16:26   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-11  4:00   ` Anup Patel
2021-01-14  5:09   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-14 18:33     ` Atish Patra
2021-01-14 19:46       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-14 21:11         ` Atish Patra
2021-01-14 21:24           ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-15  7:59           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-15 22:44             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-17 19:03               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-20 10:59                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-16  1:39             ` Atish Patra
2021-01-17 18:55               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-12 15:52       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-07  9:26 ` [PATCH 4/4] RISC-V: Fix maximum allowed phsyical memory " Atish Patra
2021-01-11  4:04   ` Anup Patel
2021-01-11  4:05 ` [PATCH 0/4] Assorted fixes " Anup Patel
2021-01-14  5:09 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-14  5:12   ` Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210107092652.3438696-2-atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --to=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anup.patel@wdc.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mick@ics.forth.gr \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).