[PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[guoren]

From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>

This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
fail.

[   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
[   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
[   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
[   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
00ffffffc58199f0
[   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
ffffffffffffffff
[   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
00ffffff8ade0cc0
[   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
00ffffffc5819a00
[   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
00ffffffc5819b00
[   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
0000000000000000
[   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
00ffffff8ade0728
[   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
00ffffffc5819e40
[   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
0000000000000000
[   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
0000000000000001
[   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
[   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
cause: 000000000000000d

The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.

Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
@@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
+	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
+		.name   = "[vvar]",
+		.fault = vvar_fault,
+	},
+	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
+		.name   = "[vdso]",
+		.mremap = vdso_mremap,
+	},
+};
+
 static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
 	.name = "compat_vdso",
 	.vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
 	.vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
-	.dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
-	.cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
+	.dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
+	.cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
 };
 #endif
 
-- 
2.36.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2022, 18:04:04 CEST schrieb guoren@kernel.org:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
> fail.
> 
> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
> 00ffffffc58199f0
> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
> ffffffffffffffff
> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
> 00ffffffc5819a00
> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
> 00ffffffc5819b00
> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
> 0000000000000000
> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
> 00ffffff8ade0728
> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
> 00ffffffc5819e40
> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
> 0000000000000000
> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
> 0000000000000001
> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> cause: 000000000000000d
> 
> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
> 
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>

on palmer's for-next branch and a Debian riscv64 rootfs:

- WITHOUT this patch I end up with:
[    3.142030] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ff60007265776f78
[    3.144398] Oops [#1]
[    3.144882] Modules linked in:
[    3.145620] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-00049-g8810d7feee5a #225
[    3.146698] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    3.147441] epc : special_mapping_fault+0x4c/0x8e
[    3.148352]  ra : __do_fault+0x28/0x11c
[    3.149005] epc : ffffffff8011ce3e ra : ffffffff80113216 sp : ff2000000060bd20
[    3.149851]  gp : ffffffff810de540 tp : ff600000012a8000 t0 : ffffffff80008af0
[    3.150651]  t1 : ffffffff80c001e0 t2 : ffffffff80c00260 s0 : ff2000000060bd30
[    3.151434]  s1 : ff2000000060bd78 a0 : ff600000013165f0 a1 : ff60000001dbc450
[    3.152734]  a2 : ff2000000060bd78 a3 : 00fffffffffff000 a4 : ff6000003f0337c8
[    3.153821]  a5 : ff60007265776f70 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000007
[    3.154709]  s2 : ff60000001dbc450 s3 : ff60000001dbc450 s4 : ffffffff810ddd69
[    3.155557]  s5 : ff60000001dbc450 s6 : 0000000000000254 s7 : 000000000000000c
[    3.156369]  s8 : 000000000000000f s9 : 000000000000000d s10: ff60000001cf8080
[    3.157242]  s11: 000000000000000d t3 : 00ffffff8232d000 t4 : 000000006ffffdff
[    3.158094]  t5 : 000000006ffffe35 t6 : 000000000000000a
[    3.158742] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ff60007265776f78 cause: 000000000000000d
[    3.160000] [<ffffffff80113216>] __do_fault+0x28/0x11c
[    3.160881] [<ffffffff80116f3e>] __handle_mm_fault+0x6ec/0x9c8
[    3.161619] [<ffffffff8011729c>] handle_mm_fault+0x82/0x136
[    3.162308] [<ffffffff80008c10>] do_page_fault+0x120/0x31c
[    3.163006] [<ffffffff800032dc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc
[    3.164607] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
-> a different error


- WITH this patch applied on top, the error above goes away and the
  qemu-system can boot normally.

So, while my error is different and I don't think there is any musl in
my rootfs, this patch definitly fixes the issue for me, so

Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>


> ---
>  arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
> +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
> +		.name   = "[vvar]",
> +		.fault = vvar_fault,
> +	},
> +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
> +		.name   = "[vdso]",
> +		.mremap = vdso_mremap,
> +	},
> +};
> +
>  static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>  	.name = "compat_vdso",
>  	.vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>  	.vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
> -	.dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> -	.cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> +	.dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> +	.cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>  };
>  #endif
>  
> 





_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2022, 21:36:16 CEST schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2022, 18:04:04 CEST schrieb guoren@kernel.org:
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> > 
> > This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
> > fail.
> > 
> > [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
> > [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
> > 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
> > [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
> > 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
> > [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> > [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
> > 00ffffffc58199f0
> > [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
> > ffffffffffffffff
> > [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> > 00ffffff8ade0cc0
> > [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
> > 00ffffffc5819a00
> > [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
> > 00ffffffc5819b00
> > [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
> > 0000000000000000
> > [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
> > 00ffffff8ade0728
> > [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
> > 00ffffffc5819e40
> > [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
> > 0000000000000001
> > [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
> > [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> > cause: 000000000000000d
> > 
> > The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
> > vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> > Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
> 
> on palmer's for-next branch and a Debian riscv64 rootfs:
> 
> - WITHOUT this patch I end up with:
> [    3.142030] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ff60007265776f78
> [    3.144398] Oops [#1]
> [    3.144882] Modules linked in:
> [    3.145620] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-00049-g8810d7feee5a #225
> [    3.146698] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> [    3.147441] epc : special_mapping_fault+0x4c/0x8e
> [    3.148352]  ra : __do_fault+0x28/0x11c
> [    3.149005] epc : ffffffff8011ce3e ra : ffffffff80113216 sp : ff2000000060bd20
> [    3.149851]  gp : ffffffff810de540 tp : ff600000012a8000 t0 : ffffffff80008af0
> [    3.150651]  t1 : ffffffff80c001e0 t2 : ffffffff80c00260 s0 : ff2000000060bd30
> [    3.151434]  s1 : ff2000000060bd78 a0 : ff600000013165f0 a1 : ff60000001dbc450
> [    3.152734]  a2 : ff2000000060bd78 a3 : 00fffffffffff000 a4 : ff6000003f0337c8
> [    3.153821]  a5 : ff60007265776f70 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000007
> [    3.154709]  s2 : ff60000001dbc450 s3 : ff60000001dbc450 s4 : ffffffff810ddd69
> [    3.155557]  s5 : ff60000001dbc450 s6 : 0000000000000254 s7 : 000000000000000c
> [    3.156369]  s8 : 000000000000000f s9 : 000000000000000d s10: ff60000001cf8080
> [    3.157242]  s11: 000000000000000d t3 : 00ffffff8232d000 t4 : 000000006ffffdff
> [    3.158094]  t5 : 000000006ffffe35 t6 : 000000000000000a
> [    3.158742] status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ff60007265776f78 cause: 000000000000000d
> [    3.160000] [<ffffffff80113216>] __do_fault+0x28/0x11c
> [    3.160881] [<ffffffff80116f3e>] __handle_mm_fault+0x6ec/0x9c8
> [    3.161619] [<ffffffff8011729c>] handle_mm_fault+0x82/0x136
> [    3.162308] [<ffffffff80008c10>] do_page_fault+0x120/0x31c
> [    3.163006] [<ffffffff800032dc>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc
> [    3.164607] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> -> a different error
> 
> 
> - WITH this patch applied on top, the error above goes away and the
>   qemu-system can boot normally.

The linux-next tree that failed for me yesterday, also works again
after this patch is applied.

Heiko


> So, while my error is different and I don't think there is any musl in
> my rootfs, this patch definitly fixes the issue for me, so
> 
> Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> > index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> > @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >  };
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
> > +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
> > +		.name   = "[vvar]",
> > +		.fault = vvar_fault,
> > +	},
> > +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
> > +		.name   = "[vdso]",
> > +		.mremap = vdso_mremap,
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> >  static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >  	.name = "compat_vdso",
> >  	.vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
> >  	.vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
> > -	.dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> > -	.cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> > +	.dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> > +	.cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >  };
> >  #endif
> >  
> > 
> 
> 





_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Guenter Roeck]

On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
> fail.
> 
> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
> 00ffffffc58199f0
> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
> ffffffffffffffff
> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
> 00ffffffc5819a00
> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
> 00ffffffc5819b00
> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
> 0000000000000000
> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
> 00ffffff8ade0728
> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
> 00ffffffc5819e40
> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
> 0000000000000000
> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
> 0000000000000001
> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> cause: 000000000000000d
> 
> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
> 
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>   };
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
> +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
> +		.name   = "[vvar]",
> +		.fault = vvar_fault,
> +	},
> +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
> +		.name   = "[vdso]",
> +		.mremap = vdso_mremap,
> +	},
> +};
> +
>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>   	.name = "compat_vdso",
>   	.vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>   	.vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
> -	.dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> -	.cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> +	.dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> +	.cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>   };
>   #endif
>   


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
>> fail.
>>
>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
>> 00ffffffc58199f0
>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
>> ffffffffffffffff
>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
>> 00ffffffc5819a00
>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
>> 00ffffffc5819b00
>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
>> 0000000000000000
>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
>> 00ffffff8ade0728
>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
>> 00ffffffc5819e40
>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
>> 0000000000000000
>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
>> 0000000000000001
>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
>> cause: 000000000000000d
>>
>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
>>
>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed 
out earlier?

>
>> ---
>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>   };
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
>> +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
>> +		.name   = "[vvar]",
>> +		.fault = vvar_fault,
>> +	},
>> +	[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
>> +		.name   = "[vdso]",
>> +		.mremap = vdso_mremap,
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>   	.name = "compat_vdso",
>>   	.vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>>   	.vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
>> -	.dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>> -	.cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>> +	.dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>> +	.cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>   };
>>   #endif
>>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Guenter Roeck]

On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>
>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
>>> fail.
>>>
>>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
>>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
>>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
>>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
>>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
>>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
>>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
>>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
>>> 0000000000000000
>>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
>>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
>>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
>>> 0000000000000000
>>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
>>> 0000000000000001
>>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
>>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
>>> cause: 000000000000000d
>>>
>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>
>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> 
> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
> 
Yes.

Thanks,
Guenter

>>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>   };
>>>
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
>>> +        .name   = "[vvar]",
>>> +        .fault = vvar_fault,
>>> +    },
>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
>>> +        .name   = "[vdso]",
>>> +        .mremap = vdso_mremap,
>>> +    },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>       .name = "compat_vdso",
>>>       .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>>>       .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
>>> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>   };
>>>   #endif
>>>


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Guo Ren]

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 5:34 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> > On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> >> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> >>
> >> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
> >> fail.
> >>
> >> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
> >> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
> >> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
> >> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
> >> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
> >> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> >> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
> >> 00ffffffc58199f0
> >> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
> >> ffffffffffffffff
> >> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> >> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
> >> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
> >> 00ffffffc5819a00
> >> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
> >> 00ffffffc5819b00
> >> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
> >> 0000000000000000
> >> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
> >> 00ffffff8ade0728
> >> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
> >> 00ffffffc5819e40
> >> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
> >> 0000000000000000
> >> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
> >> 0000000000000001
> >> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
> >> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> >> cause: 000000000000000d
> >>
> >> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
> >> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> >> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
> >
> > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>
> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed
> out earlier?
I've updated patch V2, please use that, thx.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220526003339.2948309-1-guoren@kernel.org/T/#u

>
> >
> >> ---
> >>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>   };
> >>
> >>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
> >> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
> >> +            .name   = "[vvar]",
> >> +            .fault = vvar_fault,
> >> +    },
> >> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
> >> +            .name   = "[vdso]",
> >> +            .mremap = vdso_mremap,
> >> +    },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>      .name = "compat_vdso",
> >>      .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
> >>      .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
> >> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >>   };
> >>   #endif
> >>



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56:07 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
>>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
>>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>
>>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
>>>> fail.
>>>>
>>>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
>>>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
>>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
>>>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
>>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
>>>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>>>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
>>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
>>>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
>>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
>>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
>>>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
>>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
>>>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
>>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
>>>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
>>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
>>>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
>>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
>>>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
>>>> 0000000000000001
>>>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
>>>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
>>>> cause: 000000000000000d
>>>>
>>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
>>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
>>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>
>> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
>>
> Yes.

Awosome, I think that was the only big blocker so far.

I added a musl-based userspace to my test setup, which is rv64-only 
(buildroot doesn't have rv32 musl, I thought upstream had it but maybe 
i'm misremembering).  This patch fixes the bug, so I've added it to 
for-next with

Fixes: 3092eb456375 ("riscv: compat: vdso: Add setup additional pages implementation")

which I think is correct, but LMK if there's an issue.  

Thanks!

(and also sorry I poked Geert instead of you about this one, oops ;))

>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
>>>> +        .name   = "[vvar]",
>>>> +        .fault = vvar_fault,
>>>> +    },
>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
>>>> +        .name   = "[vdso]",
>>>> +        .mremap = vdso_mremap,
>>>> +    },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>>       .name = "compat_vdso",
>>>>       .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>>>>       .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
>>>> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>>   };
>>>>   #endif
>>>>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Wed, 25 May 2022 17:39:39 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56:07 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
>> On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
>>>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
>>>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
>>>>> fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
>>>>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
>>>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
>>>>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
>>>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
>>>>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>>>>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
>>>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
>>>>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
>>>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>>>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
>>>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
>>>>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
>>>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
>>>>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
>>>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
>>>>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
>>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
>>>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
>>>>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
>>>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
>>>>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
>>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
>>>>> 0000000000000001
>>>>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
>>>>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
>>>>> cause: 000000000000000d
>>>>>
>>>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
>>>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
>>>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
>>>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>
>>> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
>>>
>> Yes.
>
> Awosome, I think that was the only big blocker so far.
>
> I added a musl-based userspace to my test setup, which is rv64-only
> (buildroot doesn't have rv32 musl, I thought upstream had it but maybe
> i'm misremembering).  This patch fixes the bug, so I've added it to
> for-next with

Just saw the v2, so I'm using that instead.

>
> Fixes: 3092eb456375 ("riscv: compat: vdso: Add setup additional pages implementation")
>
> which I think is correct, but LMK if there's an issue.
>
> Thanks!
>
> (and also sorry I poked Geert instead of you about this one, oops ;))
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guenter
>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
>>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
>>>>> +        .name   = "[vvar]",
>>>>> +        .fault = vvar_fault,
>>>>> +    },
>>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
>>>>> +        .name   = "[vdso]",
>>>>> +        .mremap = vdso_mremap,
>>>>> +    },
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>>>       .name = "compat_vdso",
>>>>>       .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>>>>>       .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
>>>>> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>>> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>>> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>>> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>>>   };
>>>>>   #endif
>>>>>

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Guo Ren]

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 8:39 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56:07 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> > On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> >>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> >>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
> >>>> fail.
> >>>>
> >>>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
> >>>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
> >>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
> >>>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
> >>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
> >>>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> >>>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
> >>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
> >>>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
> >>>> ffffffffffffffff
> >>>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> >>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
> >>>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
> >>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
> >>>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
> >>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
> >>>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
> >>>> 0000000000000000
> >>>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
> >>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
> >>>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
> >>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
> >>>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
> >>>> 0000000000000000
> >>>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
> >>>> 0000000000000001
> >>>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
> >>>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> >>>> cause: 000000000000000d
> >>>>
> >>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
> >>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
> >>>>
> >>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> >>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> >>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
> >>>
> >>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>
> >> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
> >>
> > Yes.
>
> Awosome, I think that was the only big blocker so far.
>
> I added a musl-based userspace to my test setup, which is rv64-only
> (buildroot doesn't have rv32 musl, I thought upstream had it but maybe
Here is rv32 musl information, I think it could be ready.
https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2020/03/12/1

> i'm misremembering).  This patch fixes the bug, so I've added it to
> for-next with
>
> Fixes: 3092eb456375 ("riscv: compat: vdso: Add setup additional pages implementation")
If for-next has merged into the Linus tree, please help add the above.

>
> which I think is correct, but LMK if there's an issue.
>
> Thanks!
>
> (and also sorry I poked Geert instead of you about this one, oops ;))
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guenter
> >
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>   };
> >>>>
> >>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
> >>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
> >>>> +        .name   = "[vvar]",
> >>>> +        .fault = vvar_fault,
> >>>> +    },
> >>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
> >>>> +        .name   = "[vdso]",
> >>>> +        .mremap = vdso_mremap,
> >>>> +    },
> >>>> +};
> >>>> +
> >>>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>       .name = "compat_vdso",
> >>>>       .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
> >>>>       .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
> >>>> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >>>> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >>>> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >>>> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >>>>   };
> >>>>   #endif
> >>>>



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

[Guo Ren]

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 8:43 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 17:39:39 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56:07 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> >> On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@roeck-us.net wrote:
> >>>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@kernel.org wrote:
> >>>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
> >>>>> fail.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
> >>>>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
> >>>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
> >>>>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
> >>>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
> >>>>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> >>>>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
> >>>>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
> >>>>> ffffffffffffffff
> >>>>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> >>>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
> >>>>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
> >>>>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
> >>>>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
> >>>>> 0000000000000000
> >>>>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
> >>>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
> >>>>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
> >>>>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
> >>>>> 0000000000000000
> >>>>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
> >>>>> 0000000000000001
> >>>>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
> >>>>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> >>>>> cause: 000000000000000d
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
> >>>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
> >>>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >>>
> >>> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
> >>>
> >> Yes.
> >
> > Awosome, I think that was the only big blocker so far.
> >
> > I added a musl-based userspace to my test setup, which is rv64-only
> > (buildroot doesn't have rv32 musl, I thought upstream had it but maybe
> > i'm misremembering).  This patch fixes the bug, so I've added it to
> > for-next with
>
> Just saw the v2, so I'm using that instead.
Sorry, v2 should be abandoned. Just adding Tested-by is enough.

>
> >
> > Fixes: 3092eb456375 ("riscv: compat: vdso: Add setup additional pages implementation")
> >
> > which I think is correct, but LMK if there's an issue.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > (and also sorry I poked Geert instead of you about this one, oops ;))
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Guenter
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >>>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
> >>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >>>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
> >>>>> +        .name   = "[vvar]",
> >>>>> +        .fault = vvar_fault,
> >>>>> +    },
> >>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
> >>>>> +        .name   = "[vdso]",
> >>>>> +        .mremap = vdso_mremap,
> >>>>> +    },
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>>       .name = "compat_vdso",
> >>>>>       .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
> >>>>>       .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
> >>>>> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >>>>> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >>>>> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >>>>> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>   #endif
> >>>>>



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv