linux-riscv.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Mao Han <han_mao@c-sky.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as 0.1 SBI.
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:40:22 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy0cvPbUxCzPH5u63=byjNeu2cmah_DscYf_mSx0a6eynA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191126032033.14825-2-atish.patra@wdc.com>

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 8:50 AM Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation version
> is defined as 0.1 and will be removed/replaced in future. Each of the
> function call in 0.1 is defined as a separate extension which makes
> easier to replace them one at a time.
>
> Rename existing implementation to reflect that. This patch is just
> a preparatory patch for SBI v0.2 and doesn't introduce any functional
> changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> index 2570c1e683d3..96aaee270ded 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> @@ -9,17 +9,17 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_SBI
> -#define SBI_SET_TIMER 0
> -#define SBI_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 1
> -#define SBI_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 2
> -#define SBI_CLEAR_IPI 3
> -#define SBI_SEND_IPI 4
> -#define SBI_REMOTE_FENCE_I 5
> -#define SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA 6
> -#define SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID 7
> -#define SBI_SHUTDOWN 8
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER 0x0
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 0x1
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 0x2
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_CLEAR_IPI 0x3
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_SEND_IPI 0x4
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_FENCE_I 0x5
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA 0x6
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID 0x7
> +#define SBI_EXT_0_1_SHUTDOWN 0x8
>
> -#define SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) ({             \
> +#define SBI_CALL(which, arg0, arg1, arg2, arg3) ({             \
>         register uintptr_t a0 asm ("a0") = (uintptr_t)(arg0);   \
>         register uintptr_t a1 asm ("a1") = (uintptr_t)(arg1);   \
>         register uintptr_t a2 asm ("a2") = (uintptr_t)(arg2);   \
> @@ -43,48 +43,50 @@
>
>  static inline void sbi_console_putchar(int ch)
>  {
> -       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR, ch);
> +       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR, ch);
>  }
>
>  static inline int sbi_console_getchar(void)
>  {
> -       return SBI_CALL_0(SBI_CONSOLE_GETCHAR);
> +       return SBI_CALL_0(SBI_EXT_0_1_CONSOLE_GETCHAR);
>  }
>
>  static inline void sbi_set_timer(uint64_t stime_value)
>  {
>  #if __riscv_xlen == 32
> -       SBI_CALL_2(SBI_SET_TIMER, stime_value, stime_value >> 32);
> +       SBI_CALL_2(SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER, stime_value,
> +                         stime_value >> 32);
>  #else
> -       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_SET_TIMER, stime_value);
> +       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_SET_TIMER, stime_value);
>  #endif
>  }
>
>  static inline void sbi_shutdown(void)
>  {
> -       SBI_CALL_0(SBI_SHUTDOWN);
> +       SBI_CALL_0(SBI_EXT_0_1_SHUTDOWN);
>  }
>
>  static inline void sbi_clear_ipi(void)
>  {
> -       SBI_CALL_0(SBI_CLEAR_IPI);
> +       SBI_CALL_0(SBI_EXT_0_1_CLEAR_IPI);
>  }
>
>  static inline void sbi_send_ipi(const unsigned long *hart_mask)
>  {
> -       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_SEND_IPI, hart_mask);
> +       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_SEND_IPI, hart_mask);
>  }
>
>  static inline void sbi_remote_fence_i(const unsigned long *hart_mask)
>  {
> -       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_REMOTE_FENCE_I, hart_mask);
> +       SBI_CALL_1(SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_FENCE_I, hart_mask);
>  }
>
>  static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
>                                          unsigned long start,
>                                          unsigned long size)
>  {
> -       SBI_CALL_3(SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA, hart_mask, start, size);
> +       SBI_CALL_3(SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA, hart_mask,
> +                         start, size);
>  }
>
>  static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
> @@ -92,7 +94,8 @@ static inline void sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(const unsigned long *hart_mask,
>                                               unsigned long size,
>                                               unsigned long asid)
>  {
> -       SBI_CALL_4(SBI_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID, hart_mask, start, size, asid);
> +       SBI_CALL_4(SBI_EXT_0_1_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA_ASID, hart_mask,
> +                         start, size, asid);
>  }
>  #else /* CONFIG_RISCV_SBI */
>  /* stubs for code that is only reachable under IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI): */
> --
> 2.23.0
>

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>

Regards,
Anup

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-26  4:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-26  3:20 [PATCH v4 0/4] Add support for SBI v0.2 Atish Patra
2019-11-26  3:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] RISC-V: Mark existing SBI as 0.1 SBI Atish Patra
2019-11-26  4:10   ` Anup Patel [this message]
2019-11-26  3:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] RISC-V: Add basic support for SBI v0.2 Atish Patra
2019-11-26  4:11   ` Anup Patel
2019-11-26  3:20 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] RISC-V: Introduce a new config for SBI v0.1 Atish Patra
2019-11-26  4:14   ` Anup Patel
2019-11-26 18:12     ` Atish Patra
2019-11-26  3:20 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] RISC-V: Implement new SBI v0.2 extensions Atish Patra
2019-11-26  4:16   ` Anup Patel
2019-11-26 18:13     ` Atish Patra
2019-11-26  6:52   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAhSdy0cvPbUxCzPH5u63=byjNeu2cmah_DscYf_mSx0a6eynA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=han_mao@c-sky.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).