[PATCH] riscv: dts: Re-organize SPI DT nodes

[PATCH] riscv: dts: Re-organize SPI DT nodes

[Yash Shah]

As per the General convention, define only device DT node in SOC DTSi
file with status = "disabled" and enable device in Board DTS file with
status = "okay"

Reported-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@sifive.com>
---
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi          | 3 +++
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts | 1 +
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi
index 4e8fbde..270f6e8 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/fu540-c000.dtsi
@@ -203,6 +203,7 @@
 			interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;
 			interrupts = <51>;
 			clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_TLCLK>;
+			status = "disabled";
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <0>;
 		};
@@ -213,6 +214,7 @@
 			interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;
 			interrupts = <52>;
 			clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_TLCLK>;
+			status = "disabled";
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <0>;
 		};
@@ -222,6 +224,7 @@
 			interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;
 			interrupts = <6>;
 			clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_TLCLK>;
+			status = "disabled";
 			#address-cells = <1>;
 			#size-cells = <0>;
 		};
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
index 4da8870..73e2af6 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
 };
 
 &qspi0 {
+	status = "okay";
 	flash@0 {
 		compatible = "issi,is25wp256", "jedec,spi-nor";
 		reg = <0>;
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: Re-organize SPI DT nodes

[Paul Walmsley]

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Yash Shah wrote:

> As per the General convention, define only device DT node in SOC DTSi
> file with status = "disabled" and enable device in Board DTS file with
> status = "okay"
> 
> Reported-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@sifive.com>

This is a good start, but should also cover the other I/O devices in the 
chip DT file.  The mandatory internal devices, like the PRCI and PLIC, can 
stay the way they are.


- Paul

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: Re-organize SPI DT nodes

[Anup Patel]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:53 AM Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Yash Shah wrote:
>
> > As per the General convention, define only device DT node in SOC DTSi
> > file with status = "disabled" and enable device in Board DTS file with
> > status = "okay"
> >
> > Reported-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@sifive.com>
>
> This is a good start, but should also cover the other I/O devices in the
> chip DT file.  The mandatory internal devices, like the PRCI and PLIC, can
> stay the way they are.

Yes, this convention only applies to SoC devices with external connections
so PRCI, PLIC, and CLINT DT nodes are not required to follow this.

Eventually, this convention helps when we have multiple boards of same
SOC and each board having different set of peripherals connections.

Regards,
Anup

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Re: [PATCH] riscv: dts: Re-organize SPI DT nodes

[Yash Shah]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:53 AM Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Yash Shah wrote:
>
> > As per the General convention, define only device DT node in SOC DTSi
> > file with status = "disabled" and enable device in Board DTS file with
> > status = "okay"
> >
> > Reported-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yash Shah <yash.shah@sifive.com>
>
> This is a good start, but should also cover the other I/O devices in the
> chip DT file.  The mandatory internal devices, like the PRCI and PLIC, can
> stay the way they are.

Ok, I will send another patch which will cover the other I/O devices
as well.  Please ignore this patch.

- Yash

>
>
> - Paul

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv