From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
Cc: Rick O'Connor <rickoco@riscv.org>,
RISC-V ISA Dev <isa-dev@groups.riscv.org>,
Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
RISC-V SW Dev <sw-dev@groups.riscv.org>,
RISC-V HW Dev <hw-dev@groups.riscv.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [hw-dev] Re: [isa-dev] UNIX-Class Platform Specification Working Group
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 04:48:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPweEDx=FDQ6QQjB2z41YOdk4jQ5RLY=BFAsA9Oi5wRozVF2Hg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDy-fDPZ5JO-iMPucigpQ45PH81n-v5sQhh1bpvrsnnYtA@mail.gmail.com>
https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/19/04/02/218226/justice-department-warns-academy-about-changing-oscar-rules-to-exclude-streaming#comments
that's interesting. i was not previously aware of "Section 1 of the
Sherman Act".
Delrahim cited Section 1 of the Sherman Act that "prohibits
anticompetitive agreements among competitors." "Accordingly,
agreements among competitors to exclude new competitors can violate
the antitrust laws when their purpose or effect is to impede
competition by goods or services that consumers purchase and enjoy but
which threaten the profits of incumbent firms," Delrahim wrote.
i wonder therefore if "deciding the standard RISC-V arrangement was
the best fit for this group as well" - excluding us from that
decision-making process constitutes a violation of the Sherman Act,
given that "profits of incumbent firms are threatened", and
"competition by goods that consumers purchase is impeded"?
l.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-03 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 16:50 UNIX-Class Platform Specification Working Group Palmer Dabbelt
2019-04-02 17:38 ` [isa-dev] " Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
[not found] ` <CABwTF4UW8YePYr9Ad65VSvef4-Y42VEvNUs=hPWyWcyH295zCw@mail.gmail.com>
2019-04-03 0:31 ` [hw-dev] " Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2019-04-03 2:43 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-04-03 3:34 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2019-04-03 4:13 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2019-04-03 4:48 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [this message]
2019-04-03 1:53 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2019-04-03 2:39 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
[not found] ` <CANs6eMn4+6XGaSOGyWoD5RK2DjQo2SUUHphqmL_dwQD-Xu-omQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-04-07 7:36 ` [isa-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-07 15:30 ` Jim Wilson
2019-04-08 6:50 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPweEDx=FDQ6QQjB2z41YOdk4jQ5RLY=BFAsA9Oi5wRozVF2Hg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lkcl@lkcl.net \
--cc=Atish.Patra@wdc.com \
--cc=gurjeet@singh.im \
--cc=hw-dev@groups.riscv.org \
--cc=isa-dev@groups.riscv.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=rickoco@riscv.org \
--cc=sw-dev@groups.riscv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).