From: "Matwey V. Kornilov" <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
To: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support"
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
Akash Gajjar <akash@openedev.com>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] rockchip: Add Single boot image (with binman, pad_cat)
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:54:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJs94EZiDzMDZ=FS_G0e+O_5Q8iP15Rvp=oa3f4h659WQEaS8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191230082819.30191-7-jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
пн, 30 дек. 2019 г. в 11:28, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>:
>
> All rockchip platforms support TPL or SPL-based bootloader
> in mainline with U-Boot proper as final stage. For each
> stage we need to burn the image on to flash with respective
> offsets.
>
> This patch creates a single boot image component using
> - binman, for arm32 rockchip platforms
> - pad_cat, for arm64 rockchip platforms.
>
> This would help users to get rid of burning different
> boot stage images.
>
> The new image called 'u-boot-rockchip.bin'
> which can burn into flash like:
>
> ₹ sudo dd if=u-boot-rockchip.bin of=/dev/sda seek=64
>
> This would support all rockchip platforms, except rk3128
> since it doesn't support for SPL yet.
>
> Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
> Cc: Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey.kornilov@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/dts/rk3036-u-boot.dtsi | 2 ++
> arch/arm/dts/rk3288-u-boot.dtsi | 2 ++
> arch/arm/dts/rockchip-u-boot.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/configs/rockchip-common.h | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/rockchip-u-boot.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index b48693e560..d5b6c45c89 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ ALL-y += u-boot-with-dtb.bin
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP)$(CONFIG_SPL),yy)
> -ALL-y += u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin
> +ALL-y += u-boot-rockchip.bin
> endif
>
> LDFLAGS_u-boot += $(LDFLAGS_FINAL)
> @@ -1387,15 +1387,25 @@ ifeq ($(CONFIG_SPL)$(CONFIG_TPL),yy)
> MKIMAGEFLAGS_u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin = -n $(CONFIG_SYS_SOC) -T $(ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE)
> tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin: tpl/u-boot-tpl.bin FORCE
> $(call if_changed,mkimage)
> -u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin: tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE
> +spl/u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin: tpl/u-boot-tpl-rockchip.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE
> $(call if_changed,cat)
> else
> MKIMAGEFLAGS_u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin = -n $(CONFIG_SYS_SOC) -T $(ROCKCHIP_IMG_TYPE)
> -u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE
> +spl/u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin: spl/u-boot-spl.bin FORCE
> $(call if_changed,mkimage)
> endif
>
> -endif
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64),)
> +u-boot-rockchip.bin: spl/u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin u-boot.img FORCE
> + $(call if_changed,binman)
> +else
> +OBJCOPYFLAGS_u-boot-rockchip.bin = -I binary -O binary \
> + --pad-to=$(CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO) --gap-fill=0xff
> +u-boot-rockchip.bin: spl/u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin u-boot.itb FORCE
> + $(call if_changed,pad_cat)
> +endif # CONFIG_ARM64
> +
> +endif # CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP
>
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_LPC32XX)$(CONFIG_SPL),yy)
> MKIMAGEFLAGS_lpc32xx-spl.img = -T lpc32xximage -a $(CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index f9dab073ea..7bd99ba3bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -1590,6 +1590,7 @@ config ARCH_STM32MP
> config ARCH_ROCKCHIP
> bool "Support Rockchip SoCs"
> select BLK
> + select BINMAN if !ARM64
> select DM
> select DM_GPIO
> select DM_I2C
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3036-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/rk3036-u-boot.dtsi
> index 1e7d079315..41ac054b81 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/rk3036-u-boot.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/rk3036-u-boot.dtsi
> @@ -2,3 +2,5 @@
> /*
> * Copyright (C) 2019 Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> */
> +
> +#include "rockchip-u-boot.dtsi"
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rk3288-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/rk3288-u-boot.dtsi
> index 3f00a3b6d3..6d31735362 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/rk3288-u-boot.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/rk3288-u-boot.dtsi
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> * Copyright (C) 2019 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> */
>
> +#include "rockchip-u-boot.dtsi"
> +
> / {
> chosen {
> u-boot,spl-boot-order = \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/rockchip-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/rockchip-u-boot.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..bc0b1412a2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/rockchip-u-boot.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2019 Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <config.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + binman {
> + filename = "u-boot-rockchip.bin";
> + pad-byte = <0xff>;
> +
> + blob {
> + filename = "spl/u-boot-spl-rockchip.bin";
> + };
> +
> + u-boot-img {
> + offset = <CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> diff --git a/include/configs/rockchip-common.h b/include/configs/rockchip-common.h
> index 68e1105a4b..d7f5ca9fa4 100644
> --- a/include/configs/rockchip-common.h
> +++ b/include/configs/rockchip-common.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>
> #define CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_MEM32
>
> +#define CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO 8355840
I may be wrong, but shouldn't CONFIG_SYS_MMCSD_RAW_MODE_U_BOOT_SECTOR
be used here?
> +
> #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
>
> /* First try to boot from SD (index 0), then eMMC (index 1) */
> --
> 2.18.0.321.gffc6fa0e3
>
--
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-31 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-30 8:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] rockchip: Add Binman support Jagan Teki
[not found] ` <20191230082819.30191-1-jagan-dyjBcgdgk7Pe9wHmmfpqLFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2019-12-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] Makefile: Add rockchip image type Jagan Teki
2019-12-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] Makefile: rockchip: Suffix platform type with tpl name Jagan Teki
2019-12-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] Makefile: rockchip: Support SPL-alone mkimage Jagan Teki
2019-12-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] Makefile: rockchip: Use u-boot preferred spl name Jagan Teki
2019-12-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] arm: dts: rk3036: Add rk3036-u-boot.dtsi Jagan Teki
2019-12-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] rockchip: Add Single boot image (with binman, pad_cat) Jagan Teki
2019-12-31 7:54 ` Matwey V. Kornilov [this message]
2019-12-31 8:04 ` Matwey V. Kornilov
[not found] ` <CAJs94EZgpHmkHAfDQUH_mqW82Jw_QJWiJgx_8Uny1ru1WfbrHw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2020-01-03 17:35 ` Jagan Teki
2019-12-30 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] doc: boards: Add rockchip documentation Jagan Teki
2019-12-30 8:41 ` Matwey V. Kornilov
[not found] ` <CAJs94EYBrwf9Pt0R-_OypT-JHWGFpZYxRhKcUXWgXTFJi9O0HA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-12-30 8:59 ` Jagan Teki
2019-12-31 7:50 ` Matwey V. Kornilov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJs94EZiDzMDZ=FS_G0e+O_5Q8iP15Rvp=oa3f4h659WQEaS8w@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=matwey.kornilov@gmail.com \
--cc=akash@openedev.com \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).