From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT] locking: Make spinlock_t and rwlock_t a RCU section on RT
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:46:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191119084640.wgsxghvc62mxlqc3@linutronix.de> (raw)
On !RT a locked spinlock_t and rwlock_t disables preemption which
implies a RCU read section. There is code that relies on that behaviour.
Add an explicit RCU read section on RT while a sleeping lock (a lock
which would disables preemption on !RT) acquired.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index cf09f8e7ed0f4..602eb7821a1b1 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -1141,6 +1141,7 @@ void __sched rt_spin_lock_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
void __lockfunc rt_spin_lock(spinlock_t *lock)
{
sleeping_lock_inc();
+ rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
rt_spin_lock_fastlock(&lock->lock, rt_spin_lock_slowlock);
@@ -1156,6 +1157,7 @@ void __lockfunc __rt_spin_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
void __lockfunc rt_spin_lock_nested(spinlock_t *lock, int subclass)
{
sleeping_lock_inc();
+ rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
rt_spin_lock_fastlock(&lock->lock, rt_spin_lock_slowlock);
@@ -1169,6 +1171,7 @@ void __lockfunc rt_spin_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
rt_spin_lock_fastunlock(&lock->lock, rt_spin_lock_slowunlock);
migrate_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
sleeping_lock_dec();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_spin_unlock);
@@ -1200,6 +1203,7 @@ int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock)
ret = __rt_mutex_trylock(&lock->lock);
if (ret) {
spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+ rcu_read_lock();
} else {
migrate_enable();
sleeping_lock_dec();
@@ -1216,6 +1220,7 @@ int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_bh(spinlock_t *lock)
ret = __rt_mutex_trylock(&lock->lock);
if (ret) {
sleeping_lock_inc();
+ rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
} else
@@ -1232,6 +1237,7 @@ int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags)
ret = __rt_mutex_trylock(&lock->lock);
if (ret) {
sleeping_lock_inc();
+ rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
}
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
index c3b91205161cc..0ae8c62ea8320 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
@@ -310,6 +310,7 @@ int __lockfunc rt_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
ret = do_read_rt_trylock(rwlock);
if (ret) {
rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+ rcu_read_lock();
} else {
migrate_enable();
sleeping_lock_dec();
@@ -327,6 +328,7 @@ int __lockfunc rt_write_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
ret = do_write_rt_trylock(rwlock);
if (ret) {
rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+ rcu_read_lock();
} else {
migrate_enable();
sleeping_lock_dec();
@@ -338,6 +340,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_trylock);
void __lockfunc rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
{
sleeping_lock_inc();
+ rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
do_read_rt_lock(rwlock);
@@ -347,6 +350,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_lock);
void __lockfunc rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
{
sleeping_lock_inc();
+ rcu_read_lock();
migrate_disable();
rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
do_write_rt_lock(rwlock);
@@ -358,6 +362,7 @@ void __lockfunc rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
do_read_rt_unlock(rwlock);
migrate_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
sleeping_lock_dec();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_unlock);
@@ -367,6 +372,7 @@ void __lockfunc rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
do_write_rt_unlock(rwlock);
migrate_enable();
+ rcu_read_unlock();
sleeping_lock_dec();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
--
2.24.0
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 8:46 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2019-11-19 14:21 ` [PATCH RT] locking: Make spinlock_t and rwlock_t a RCU section on RT Steven Rostedt
2019-11-19 14:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-22 18:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-11-25 17:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-29 15:45 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-11-29 22:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-19 14:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191119084640.wgsxghvc62mxlqc3@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).