linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	dunc.mcphie@gmail.com, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 14:02:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD56B7fqosJAhiCLikhcxv_3wY7ETOv++kmQcr-=9NKEGq7Agw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190813095306.xqgq3uusdpj7dhy7@linutronix.de>

On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:53 AM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On 2019-07-17 18:28:51 [-0400], Paul Thomas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:21 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The one below should fix it for real.
> > >
> > > That still has an issue which needs deeper investigation. Just keep the
> > > offending patch reverted for now.
> >
> > OK, sounds good.
>
> could you please try the following hunk?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 6808cd9526c67..63c6960262861 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -648,7 +648,8 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
>         orr     x24, x24, x0
>  alternative_else_nop_endif
>
> -       cbnz    x24, 2f                                 // preempt count != 0
> +       cbz     x24, 1f                                 // (need_resched + count) == 0
> +       cbnz    w24, 2f                                 // count != 0
>
>         ldr     w24, [tsk, #TSK_TI_PREEMPT_LAZY]        // get preempt lazy count
>         cbnz    w24, 2f                                 // preempt lazy count != 0
>
I still get large latencies, like this:
root@xu5:/opt/rt-tests# ./cyclictest -h ./cyclictest -S -m -n -p 99 -i
200 -h 400 -D 900
# /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.10 0.10 0.03 1/134 1901

T: 0 ( 1886) P:99 I:200 C:2724618 Min:      5 Act:    6 Avg:    6 Max:      45
T: 1 ( 1887) P:99 I:200 C:2724525 Min:      5 Act:    7 Avg:    6 Max:      29
T: 2 ( 1888) P:99 I:200 C:2724246 Min:      5 Act:    6 Avg:    6 Max:    6338
T: 3 ( 1889) P:99 I:200 C:2724339 Min:      5 Act:    8 Avg:    6 Max:     141

This is with the Lazy preempt commit in there.

thanks,
Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-13 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-12 11:18 poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 Paul Thomas
     [not found] ` <CAD56B7c2=95r7r-6tr0Mby8jSeuQPDNSd4LELnUw1LVRn9Rqew@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-12 11:32   ` Paul Thomas
2019-07-16 20:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-16 21:50   ` Paul Thomas
2019-07-16 23:14     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17  0:44       ` Paul Thomas
2019-07-17  8:03         ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17  8:10           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17  9:02             ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17 10:21               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-07-17 22:28                 ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-13  9:53                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-13 18:02                     ` Paul Thomas [this message]
2019-08-14 11:26                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 16:17                         ` [PATCH RT] arm64: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 16:17                         ` [PATCH RT] x86: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 17:04                         ` poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 Paul Thomas
2019-08-15  8:29                           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 12:33                             ` John Ogness
2019-08-15 13:30                               ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 13:42                               ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 13:52                                 ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 14:19                                   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 15:12                                     ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 15:15                                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-15 15:31                                         ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 18:00                     ` Paul Thomas
2019-08-15 18:57                       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAD56B7fqosJAhiCLikhcxv_3wY7ETOv++kmQcr-=9NKEGq7Agw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=pthomas8589@gmail.com \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dunc.mcphie@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).