Linux-rt-users archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* devel branches in rt-tests
@ 2019-12-12  7:52 Uwe Kleine-König
  2019-12-13 16:01 ` John Kacur
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2019-12-12  7:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John Kacur; +Cc: Clark Williams, linux-rt-users

Hello John,

I wonder about the two branches

	unstable/devel/latest (at 07a73b6ecf748c424c676f1ba8030ca678360e0e)
	unstable/devel/latest-devel (at c5aa9a877b146846da21e5d63597a2a09a3c96d7)

in the rt-tests.git repository.

According to

	git range-diff origin/unstable/devel/latest...origin/unstable/devel/latest-devel

the two contain mostly identical commits. It seems to me
unstable/devel/latest is a rebased version of
unstable/devel/latest-devel as the commit dates are newer and two
patches that are duplicated in .../latest-devel[1] only occur once each in
.../latest. Also .../latest has 5 more commits.

Does that mean unstable/devel/latest-devel is the one to ignore?

Best regards
Uwe

[1] git range-diff 97632deddf783249e0e3d34630792c7696b7d5d5...90449d993fc9973381f1c37fbda37c39a43ab503

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: devel branches in rt-tests
  2019-12-12  7:52 devel branches in rt-tests Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2019-12-13 16:01 ` John Kacur
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Kacur @ 2019-12-13 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König; +Cc: Clark Williams, linux-rt-users

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1202 bytes --]



On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> Hello John,
> 
> I wonder about the two branches
> 
> 	unstable/devel/latest (at 07a73b6ecf748c424c676f1ba8030ca678360e0e)
> 	unstable/devel/latest-devel (at c5aa9a877b146846da21e5d63597a2a09a3c96d7)
> 
> in the rt-tests.git repository.
> 
> According to
> 
> 	git range-diff origin/unstable/devel/latest...origin/unstable/devel/latest-devel
> 
> the two contain mostly identical commits. It seems to me
> unstable/devel/latest is a rebased version of
> unstable/devel/latest-devel as the commit dates are newer and two
> patches that are duplicated in .../latest-devel[1] only occur once each in
> .../latest. Also .../latest has 5 more commits.
> 
> Does that mean unstable/devel/latest-devel is the one to ignore?
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> [1] git range-diff 97632deddf783249e0e3d34630792c7696b7d5d5...90449d993fc9973381f1c37fbda37c39a43ab503
> 
> -- 

My original intention was to do development in the devel branch, and 
update latest for new releases. I think that people have found this 
confusing though, so I'm thinking of doing away with the latest-devel 
branch. You are correct that latest is currently more up to date than 
latest-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-12  7:52 devel branches in rt-tests Uwe Kleine-König
2019-12-13 16:01 ` John Kacur

Linux-rt-users archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/0 linux-rt-users/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-rt-users linux-rt-users/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users \
		linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-rt-users

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-rt-users


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git