linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/8] s390x: Remove SAVE/RESTORE_stack
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:50:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12198726-590c-7ac8-2b89-115d658ad367@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd386faf-c635-970a-6be8-659f5f6b4ba8@linux.ibm.com>

On 17/02/2021 17.46, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 2/17/21 5:18 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 17/02/2021 15.41, Janosch Frank wrote:
>>> There are no more users.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>    s390x/macros.S | 29 -----------------------------
>>>    1 file changed, 29 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/s390x/macros.S b/s390x/macros.S
>>> index 212a3823..399a87c6 100644
>>> --- a/s390x/macros.S
>>> +++ b/s390x/macros.S
>>> @@ -28,35 +28,6 @@
>>>    	lpswe	\old_psw
>>>    	.endm
>>>    
>>> -	.macro SAVE_REGS
>>> -	/* save grs 0-15 */
>>> -	stmg	%r0, %r15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_GRS
>>> -	/* save crs 0-15 */
>>> -	stctg	%c0, %c15, GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS
>>> -	/* load a cr0 that has the AFP control bit which enables all FPRs */
>>> -	larl	%r1, initial_cr0
>>> -	lctlg	%c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
>>> -	/* save fprs 0-15 + fpc */
>>> -	la	%r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS
>>> -	.irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
>>> -	std	\i, \i * 8(%r1)
>>> -	.endr
>>> -	stfpc	GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC
>>> -	.endm
>>> -
>>> -	.macro RESTORE_REGS
>>> -	/* restore fprs 0-15 + fpc */
>>> -	la	%r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS
>>> -	.irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
>>> -	ld	\i, \i * 8(%r1)
>>> -	.endr
>>> -	lfpc	GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC
>>
>> Could we now also remove the sw_int_fprs and sw_int_fpc from the lowcore?
>>
>>    Thomas
>>
> 
> git grep tells me that we can.
> Do you want to have both the offset macro and the struct member removed
> or only the macro?

I'd remove both.

  Thomas


      reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-17 14:41 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/8] s390x: Cleanup exception register save/restore and implement backtrace Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/8] s390x: Fix fpc store address in RESTORE_REGS_STACK Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/8] s390x: Fully commit to stack save area for exceptions Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 15:35   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-17 16:54     ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/8] RFC: s390x: Define STACK_FRAME_INT_SIZE macro Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 15:38   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-17 16:08     ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 16:10       ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/8] s390x: Introduce and use CALL_INT_HANDLER macro Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 15:49   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-17 15:55   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-17 16:22     ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 17:03       ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-18  9:16         ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/8] s390x: Provide preliminary backtrace support Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 16:01   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-17 16:12     ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/8] s390x: Print more information on program exceptions Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/8] s390x: Move diag308_load_reset to stack saving Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 14:41 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/8] s390x: Remove SAVE/RESTORE_stack Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 16:18   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-17 16:46     ` Janosch Frank
2021-02-17 16:50       ` Thomas Huth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12198726-590c-7ac8-2b89-115d658ad367@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).