linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check
@ 2021-02-18  8:24 Janosch Frank
  2021-02-18  8:32 ` David Hildenbrand
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2021-02-18  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kvm; +Cc: linux-s390, imbrenda, david, thuth

Turns out that partition numbers start from 0 and not from 1 so a 0
check doesn't make sense here.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
 s390x/sthyi.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/s390x/sthyi.c b/s390x/sthyi.c
index d8dfc854..db90b56f 100644
--- a/s390x/sthyi.c
+++ b/s390x/sthyi.c
@@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ static void test_fcode0_par(struct sthyi_par_sctn *par)
 		report(sum, "core counts");
 
 	if (par->INFPVAL1 & PART_STSI_SUC) {
-		report(par->INFPPNUM, "number");
 		report(memcmp(par->INFPPNAM, null_buf, sizeof(par->INFPPNAM)),
 		       "name");
 	}
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check
  2021-02-18  8:24 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check Janosch Frank
@ 2021-02-18  8:32 ` David Hildenbrand
  2021-02-18  8:51 ` Cornelia Huck
  2021-02-18 14:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand @ 2021-02-18  8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank, kvm; +Cc: linux-s390, imbrenda, thuth

On 18.02.21 09:24, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Turns out that partition numbers start from 0 and not from 1 so a 0
> check doesn't make sense here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   s390x/sthyi.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/sthyi.c b/s390x/sthyi.c
> index d8dfc854..db90b56f 100644
> --- a/s390x/sthyi.c
> +++ b/s390x/sthyi.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ static void test_fcode0_par(struct sthyi_par_sctn *par)
>   		report(sum, "core counts");
>   
>   	if (par->INFPVAL1 & PART_STSI_SUC) {
> -		report(par->INFPPNUM, "number");
>   		report(memcmp(par->INFPPNAM, null_buf, sizeof(par->INFPPNAM)),
>   		       "name");
>   	}
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check
  2021-02-18  8:24 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check Janosch Frank
  2021-02-18  8:32 ` David Hildenbrand
@ 2021-02-18  8:51 ` Cornelia Huck
  2021-02-18 14:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cornelia Huck @ 2021-02-18  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, imbrenda, david, thuth

On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:24:49 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Turns out that partition numbers start from 0 and not from 1 so a 0
> check doesn't make sense here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  s390x/sthyi.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/sthyi.c b/s390x/sthyi.c
> index d8dfc854..db90b56f 100644
> --- a/s390x/sthyi.c
> +++ b/s390x/sthyi.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ static void test_fcode0_par(struct sthyi_par_sctn *par)
>  		report(sum, "core counts");
>  
>  	if (par->INFPVAL1 & PART_STSI_SUC) {
> -		report(par->INFPPNUM, "number");
>  		report(memcmp(par->INFPPNAM, null_buf, sizeof(par->INFPPNAM)),
>  		       "name");
>  	}

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check
  2021-02-18  8:24 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check Janosch Frank
  2021-02-18  8:32 ` David Hildenbrand
  2021-02-18  8:51 ` Cornelia Huck
@ 2021-02-18 14:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Claudio Imbrenda @ 2021-02-18 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janosch Frank; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390, david, thuth

On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 03:24:49 -0500
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Turns out that partition numbers start from 0 and not from 1 so a 0
> check doesn't make sense here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  s390x/sthyi.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/sthyi.c b/s390x/sthyi.c
> index d8dfc854..db90b56f 100644
> --- a/s390x/sthyi.c
> +++ b/s390x/sthyi.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,6 @@ static void test_fcode0_par(struct sthyi_par_sctn
> *par) report(sum, "core counts");
>  
>  	if (par->INFPVAL1 & PART_STSI_SUC) {
> -		report(par->INFPPNUM, "number");
>  		report(memcmp(par->INFPPNAM, null_buf,
> sizeof(par->INFPPNAM)), "name");
>  	}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-02-18 17:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-02-18  8:24 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x: Remove sthyi partition number check Janosch Frank
2021-02-18  8:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-18  8:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-18 14:54 ` Claudio Imbrenda

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).