linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6] s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions
@ 2023-03-17 11:23 Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
  2023-03-20 12:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch @ 2023-03-17 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, Claudio Imbrenda, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
  Cc: David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390

Test the instruction address used by targets of an execute instruction.
When the target instruction calculates a relative address, the result is
relative to the target instruction, not the execute instruction.

Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---


v5 -> v6:
 * fix section for exrl targets (thanks Claudio)
 * add comments (thanks Claudio)

v4 -> v5:
 * word align the execute-type instruction, preventing a specification
   exception if the address calculation is wrong, since LLGFRL requires
   word alignment
 * change wording of comment

v3 -> v4:
 * fix nits (thanks Janosch)
 * pickup R-b (thanks Janosch)

v2 -> v3:
 * add some comments (thanks Janosch)
 * add two new tests (drop Nico's R-b)
 * push prefix

v1 -> v2:
 * add test to unittests.cfg and .gitlab-ci.yml
 * pick up R-b (thanks Nico)


See https://patchew.org/QEMU/20230316210751.302423-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
for TCG fixes.


Range-diff against v5:
1:  57f8f256 ! 1:  3893f723 s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions
    @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
     +#include <libcflat.h>
     +
     +/*
    ++ * Accesses to the operand of execute-type instructions are instruction fetches.
    ++ * Minimum alignment is two, since the relative offset is specified by number of halfwords.
    ++ */
    ++asm (  ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets,\"x\"\n"
    ++"	.balign	2\n"
    ++"	.popsection\n"
    ++);
    ++
    ++/*
     + * BRANCH AND SAVE, register register variant.
     + * Saves the next instruction address (address from PSW + length of instruction)
     + * to the first register. No branch is taken in this test, because 0 is
    @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
     +	uint64_t ret_addr, after_ex;
     +
     +	report_prefix_push("BASR");
    -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
    ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
     +		"0:	basr	%[ret_addr],0\n"
     +		"	.popsection\n"
     +
    @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
     +	uint64_t after_target, ret_addr, after_ex, branch_addr;
     +
     +	report_prefix_push("BRAS");
    -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.ex_bras, \"x\"\n"
    ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
     +		"0:	bras	%[ret_addr],1f\n"
     +		"	nopr	%%r7\n"
     +		"1:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
    @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
     +		"	larl	%[after_target],1b\n"
     +		"	larl	%[after_ex],3f\n"
     +		"2:	exrl	0,0b\n"
    ++/*
    ++ * In case the address calculation is correct, we jump by the relative offset 1b-0b from 0b to 1b.
    ++ * In case the address calculation is relative to the exrl (i.e. a test failure),
    ++ * put a valid instruction at the same relative offset from the exrl, so the test continues in a
    ++ * controlled manner.
    ++ */
     +		"3:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
     +		"4:\n"
     +
    @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
     +	uint64_t target, addr;
     +
     +	report_prefix_push("LARL");
    -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
    ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
     +		"0:	larl	%[addr],0\n"
     +		"	.popsection\n"
     +
    @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
     +	uint64_t target, value;
     +
     +	report_prefix_push("LLGFRL");
    -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
    ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
     +		"	.balign	4\n"
    ++		 //operand of llgfrl must be word aligned
     +		"0:	llgfrl	%[value],0\n"
     +		"	.popsection\n"
     +
    @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
     +	uint32_t program_mask, cc, crl_word;
     +
     +	report_prefix_push("CRL");
    -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
    ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
     +		 //operand of crl must be word aligned
     +		 "	.balign	4\n"
     +		"0:	crl	%[crl_word],0\n"

 s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
 s390x/ex.c          | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 s390x/unittests.cfg |   3 +
 .gitlab-ci.yml      |   1 +
 4 files changed, 193 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 s390x/ex.c

diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
index 97a61611..6cf8018b 100644
--- a/s390x/Makefile
+++ b/s390x/Makefile
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-extint.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-pgm.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-sck.elf
 tests += $(TEST_DIR)/exittime.elf
+tests += $(TEST_DIR)/ex.elf
 
 pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
 
diff --git a/s390x/ex.c b/s390x/ex.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..dbd8030d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/s390x/ex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2023
+ *
+ * Test EXECUTE (RELATIVE LONG).
+ * These instructions execute a target instruction. The target instruction is formed
+ * by reading an instruction from memory and optionally modifying some of its bits.
+ * The execution of the target instruction is the same as if it was executed
+ * normally as part of the instruction sequence, except for the instruction
+ * address and the instruction-length code.
+ */
+
+#include <libcflat.h>
+
+/*
+ * Accesses to the operand of execute-type instructions are instruction fetches.
+ * Minimum alignment is two, since the relative offset is specified by number of halfwords.
+ */
+asm (  ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets,\"x\"\n"
+"	.balign	2\n"
+"	.popsection\n"
+);
+
+/*
+ * BRANCH AND SAVE, register register variant.
+ * Saves the next instruction address (address from PSW + length of instruction)
+ * to the first register. No branch is taken in this test, because 0 is
+ * specified as target.
+ * BASR does *not* perform a relative address calculation with an intermediate.
+ */
+static void test_basr(void)
+{
+	uint64_t ret_addr, after_ex;
+
+	report_prefix_push("BASR");
+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
+		"0:	basr	%[ret_addr],0\n"
+		"	.popsection\n"
+
+		"	larl	%[after_ex],1f\n"
+		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
+		"1:\n"
+		: [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr),
+		  [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex)
+	);
+
+	report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE.
+ * According to PoP (Branch-Address Generation), the address calculated relative
+ * to the instruction address is relative to BRAS when it is the target of an
+ * execute-type instruction, not relative to the execute-type instruction.
+ */
+static void test_bras(void)
+{
+	uint64_t after_target, ret_addr, after_ex, branch_addr;
+
+	report_prefix_push("BRAS");
+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
+		"0:	bras	%[ret_addr],1f\n"
+		"	nopr	%%r7\n"
+		"1:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
+		"	j	4f\n"
+		"	.popsection\n"
+
+		"	larl	%[after_target],1b\n"
+		"	larl	%[after_ex],3f\n"
+		"2:	exrl	0,0b\n"
+/*
+ * In case the address calculation is correct, we jump by the relative offset 1b-0b from 0b to 1b.
+ * In case the address calculation is relative to the exrl (i.e. a test failure),
+ * put a valid instruction at the same relative offset from the exrl, so the test continues in a
+ * controlled manner.
+ */
+		"3:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
+		"4:\n"
+
+		"	.if (1b - 0b) != (3b - 2b)\n"
+		"	.error	\"right and wrong target must have same offset\"\n"
+		"	.endif\n"
+		: [after_target] "=d" (after_target),
+		  [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr),
+		  [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex),
+		  [branch_addr] "=d" (branch_addr)
+	);
+
+	report(after_target == branch_addr, "address calculated relative to BRAS");
+	report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * LOAD ADDRESS RELATIVE LONG.
+ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
+ * to the LARL.
+ */
+static void test_larl(void)
+{
+	uint64_t target, addr;
+
+	report_prefix_push("LARL");
+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
+		"0:	larl	%[addr],0\n"
+		"	.popsection\n"
+
+		"	larl	%[target],0b\n"
+		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
+		: [target] "=d" (target),
+		  [addr] "=d" (addr)
+	);
+
+	report(target == addr, "address calculated relative to LARL");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/* LOAD LOGICAL RELATIVE LONG.
+ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
+ * to the LLGFRL.
+ */
+static void test_llgfrl(void)
+{
+	uint64_t target, value;
+
+	report_prefix_push("LLGFRL");
+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
+		"	.balign	4\n"
+		 //operand of llgfrl must be word aligned
+		"0:	llgfrl	%[value],0\n"
+		"	.popsection\n"
+
+		"	llgfrl	%[target],0b\n"
+		//align (pad with nop), in case the wrong operand is used
+		"	.balignw 4,0x0707\n"
+		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
+		: [target] "=d" (target),
+		  [value] "=d" (value)
+	);
+
+	report(target == value, "loaded correct value");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+/*
+ * COMPARE RELATIVE LONG
+ * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
+ * to the CRL.
+ */
+static void test_crl(void)
+{
+	uint32_t program_mask, cc, crl_word;
+
+	report_prefix_push("CRL");
+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
+		 //operand of crl must be word aligned
+		 "	.balign	4\n"
+		"0:	crl	%[crl_word],0\n"
+		"	.popsection\n"
+
+		"	lrl	%[crl_word],0b\n"
+		//align (pad with nop), in case the wrong operand is used
+		"	.balignw 4,0x0707\n"
+		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
+		"	ipm	%[program_mask]\n"
+		: [program_mask] "=d" (program_mask),
+		  [crl_word] "=d" (crl_word)
+		:: "cc"
+	);
+
+	cc = program_mask >> 28;
+	report(!cc, "operand compared to is relative to CRL");
+	report_prefix_pop();
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	report_prefix_push("ex");
+	test_basr();
+	test_bras();
+	test_larl();
+	test_llgfrl();
+	test_crl();
+	report_prefix_pop();
+
+	return report_summary();
+}
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index d97eb5e9..b61faf07 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -215,3 +215,6 @@ file = migration-skey.elf
 smp = 2
 groups = migration
 extra_params = -append '--parallel'
+
+[execute]
+file = ex.elf
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
index ad7949c9..a999f64a 100644
--- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
+++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ s390x-kvm:
   - ACCEL=kvm ./run_tests.sh
       selftest-setup intercept emulator sieve sthyi diag10 diag308 pfmf
       cmm vector gs iep cpumodel diag288 stsi sclp-1g sclp-3g css skrf sie
+      execute
       | tee results.txt
   - grep -q PASS results.txt && ! grep -q FAIL results.txt
  only:

base-commit: 20de8c3b54078ebc3df0b47344f9ce55bf52b7a5
-- 
2.39.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6] s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions
  2023-03-17 11:23 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6] s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
@ 2023-03-20 12:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Claudio Imbrenda @ 2023-03-20 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
  Cc: Thomas Huth, Janosch Frank, David Hildenbrand, kvm, linux-s390

On Fri, 17 Mar 2023 12:23:39 +0100
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Test the instruction address used by targets of an execute instruction.
> When the target instruction calculates a relative address, the result is
> relative to the target instruction, not the execute instruction.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
> 
> v5 -> v6:
>  * fix section for exrl targets (thanks Claudio)
>  * add comments (thanks Claudio)
> 
> v4 -> v5:
>  * word align the execute-type instruction, preventing a specification
>    exception if the address calculation is wrong, since LLGFRL requires
>    word alignment
>  * change wording of comment
> 
> v3 -> v4:
>  * fix nits (thanks Janosch)
>  * pickup R-b (thanks Janosch)
> 
> v2 -> v3:
>  * add some comments (thanks Janosch)
>  * add two new tests (drop Nico's R-b)
>  * push prefix
> 
> v1 -> v2:
>  * add test to unittests.cfg and .gitlab-ci.yml
>  * pick up R-b (thanks Nico)
> 
> 
> See https://patchew.org/QEMU/20230316210751.302423-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
> for TCG fixes.
> 
> 
> Range-diff against v5:
> 1:  57f8f256 ! 1:  3893f723 s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions
>     @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
>      +#include <libcflat.h>
>      +
>      +/*
>     ++ * Accesses to the operand of execute-type instructions are instruction fetches.
>     ++ * Minimum alignment is two, since the relative offset is specified by number of halfwords.
>     ++ */
>     ++asm (  ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets,\"x\"\n"
>     ++"	.balign	2\n"
>     ++"	.popsection\n"
>     ++);
>     ++
>     ++/*
>      + * BRANCH AND SAVE, register register variant.
>      + * Saves the next instruction address (address from PSW + length of instruction)
>      + * to the first register. No branch is taken in this test, because 0 is
>     @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
>      +	uint64_t ret_addr, after_ex;
>      +
>      +	report_prefix_push("BASR");
>     -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
>     ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
>      +		"0:	basr	%[ret_addr],0\n"
>      +		"	.popsection\n"
>      +
>     @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
>      +	uint64_t after_target, ret_addr, after_ex, branch_addr;
>      +
>      +	report_prefix_push("BRAS");
>     -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.ex_bras, \"x\"\n"
>     ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
>      +		"0:	bras	%[ret_addr],1f\n"
>      +		"	nopr	%%r7\n"
>      +		"1:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
>     @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
>      +		"	larl	%[after_target],1b\n"
>      +		"	larl	%[after_ex],3f\n"
>      +		"2:	exrl	0,0b\n"
>     ++/*
>     ++ * In case the address calculation is correct, we jump by the relative offset 1b-0b from 0b to 1b.
>     ++ * In case the address calculation is relative to the exrl (i.e. a test failure),
>     ++ * put a valid instruction at the same relative offset from the exrl, so the test continues in a
>     ++ * controlled manner.
>     ++ */
>      +		"3:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
>      +		"4:\n"
>      +
>     @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
>      +	uint64_t target, addr;
>      +
>      +	report_prefix_push("LARL");
>     -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
>     ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
>      +		"0:	larl	%[addr],0\n"
>      +		"	.popsection\n"
>      +
>     @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
>      +	uint64_t target, value;
>      +
>      +	report_prefix_push("LLGFRL");
>     -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
>     ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
>      +		"	.balign	4\n"
>     ++		 //operand of llgfrl must be word aligned
>      +		"0:	llgfrl	%[value],0\n"
>      +		"	.popsection\n"
>      +
>     @@ s390x/ex.c (new)
>      +	uint32_t program_mask, cc, crl_word;
>      +
>      +	report_prefix_push("CRL");
>     -+	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .rodata\n"
>     ++	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
>      +		 //operand of crl must be word aligned
>      +		 "	.balign	4\n"
>      +		"0:	crl	%[crl_word],0\n"
> 
>  s390x/Makefile      |   1 +
>  s390x/ex.c          | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/unittests.cfg |   3 +
>  .gitlab-ci.yml      |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 193 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 s390x/ex.c
> 
> diff --git a/s390x/Makefile b/s390x/Makefile
> index 97a61611..6cf8018b 100644
> --- a/s390x/Makefile
> +++ b/s390x/Makefile
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-extint.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/panic-loop-pgm.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/migration-sck.elf
>  tests += $(TEST_DIR)/exittime.elf
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/ex.elf
>  
>  pv-tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pv-diags.elf
>  
> diff --git a/s390x/ex.c b/s390x/ex.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..dbd8030d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/s390x/ex.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright IBM Corp. 2023
> + *
> + * Test EXECUTE (RELATIVE LONG).
> + * These instructions execute a target instruction. The target instruction is formed
> + * by reading an instruction from memory and optionally modifying some of its bits.
> + * The execution of the target instruction is the same as if it was executed
> + * normally as part of the instruction sequence, except for the instruction
> + * address and the instruction-length code.
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Accesses to the operand of execute-type instructions are instruction fetches.
> + * Minimum alignment is two, since the relative offset is specified by number of halfwords.
> + */
> +asm (  ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets,\"x\"\n"
> +"	.balign	2\n"
> +"	.popsection\n"
> +);
> +
> +/*
> + * BRANCH AND SAVE, register register variant.
> + * Saves the next instruction address (address from PSW + length of instruction)
> + * to the first register. No branch is taken in this test, because 0 is
> + * specified as target.
> + * BASR does *not* perform a relative address calculation with an intermediate.
> + */
> +static void test_basr(void)
> +{
> +	uint64_t ret_addr, after_ex;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("BASR");
> +	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
> +		"0:	basr	%[ret_addr],0\n"
> +		"	.popsection\n"
> +
> +		"	larl	%[after_ex],1f\n"
> +		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
> +		"1:\n"
> +		: [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr),
> +		  [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex)
> +	);
> +
> +	report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * BRANCH RELATIVE AND SAVE.
> + * According to PoP (Branch-Address Generation), the address calculated relative
> + * to the instruction address is relative to BRAS when it is the target of an
> + * execute-type instruction, not relative to the execute-type instruction.
> + */
> +static void test_bras(void)
> +{
> +	uint64_t after_target, ret_addr, after_ex, branch_addr;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("BRAS");
> +	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
> +		"0:	bras	%[ret_addr],1f\n"
> +		"	nopr	%%r7\n"
> +		"1:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
> +		"	j	4f\n"
> +		"	.popsection\n"
> +
> +		"	larl	%[after_target],1b\n"
> +		"	larl	%[after_ex],3f\n"
> +		"2:	exrl	0,0b\n"
> +/*
> + * In case the address calculation is correct, we jump by the relative offset 1b-0b from 0b to 1b.
> + * In case the address calculation is relative to the exrl (i.e. a test failure),
> + * put a valid instruction at the same relative offset from the exrl, so the test continues in a
> + * controlled manner.
> + */
> +		"3:	larl	%[branch_addr],0\n"
> +		"4:\n"
> +
> +		"	.if (1b - 0b) != (3b - 2b)\n"
> +		"	.error	\"right and wrong target must have same offset\"\n"
> +		"	.endif\n"
> +		: [after_target] "=d" (after_target),
> +		  [ret_addr] "=d" (ret_addr),
> +		  [after_ex] "=d" (after_ex),
> +		  [branch_addr] "=d" (branch_addr)
> +	);
> +
> +	report(after_target == branch_addr, "address calculated relative to BRAS");
> +	report(ret_addr == after_ex, "return address after EX");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * LOAD ADDRESS RELATIVE LONG.
> + * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
> + * to the LARL.
> + */
> +static void test_larl(void)
> +{
> +	uint64_t target, addr;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("LARL");
> +	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
> +		"0:	larl	%[addr],0\n"
> +		"	.popsection\n"
> +
> +		"	larl	%[target],0b\n"
> +		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
> +		: [target] "=d" (target),
> +		  [addr] "=d" (addr)
> +	);
> +
> +	report(target == addr, "address calculated relative to LARL");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/* LOAD LOGICAL RELATIVE LONG.
> + * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
> + * to the LLGFRL.
> + */
> +static void test_llgfrl(void)
> +{
> +	uint64_t target, value;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("LLGFRL");
> +	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
> +		"	.balign	4\n"
> +		 //operand of llgfrl must be word aligned
> +		"0:	llgfrl	%[value],0\n"
> +		"	.popsection\n"
> +
> +		"	llgfrl	%[target],0b\n"
> +		//align (pad with nop), in case the wrong operand is used
> +		"	.balignw 4,0x0707\n"
> +		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
> +		: [target] "=d" (target),
> +		  [value] "=d" (value)
> +	);
> +
> +	report(target == value, "loaded correct value");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * COMPARE RELATIVE LONG
> + * If it is the target of an execute-type instruction, the address is relative
> + * to the CRL.
> + */
> +static void test_crl(void)
> +{
> +	uint32_t program_mask, cc, crl_word;
> +
> +	report_prefix_push("CRL");
> +	asm volatile ( ".pushsection .text.exrl_targets\n"
> +		 //operand of crl must be word aligned
> +		 "	.balign	4\n"
> +		"0:	crl	%[crl_word],0\n"
> +		"	.popsection\n"
> +
> +		"	lrl	%[crl_word],0b\n"
> +		//align (pad with nop), in case the wrong operand is used
> +		"	.balignw 4,0x0707\n"
> +		"	exrl	0,0b\n"
> +		"	ipm	%[program_mask]\n"
> +		: [program_mask] "=d" (program_mask),
> +		  [crl_word] "=d" (crl_word)
> +		:: "cc"
> +	);
> +
> +	cc = program_mask >> 28;
> +	report(!cc, "operand compared to is relative to CRL");
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +	report_prefix_push("ex");
> +	test_basr();
> +	test_bras();
> +	test_larl();
> +	test_llgfrl();
> +	test_crl();
> +	report_prefix_pop();
> +
> +	return report_summary();
> +}
> diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> index d97eb5e9..b61faf07 100644
> --- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
> @@ -215,3 +215,6 @@ file = migration-skey.elf
>  smp = 2
>  groups = migration
>  extra_params = -append '--parallel'
> +
> +[execute]
> +file = ex.elf
> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
> index ad7949c9..a999f64a 100644
> --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
> @@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ s390x-kvm:
>    - ACCEL=kvm ./run_tests.sh
>        selftest-setup intercept emulator sieve sthyi diag10 diag308 pfmf
>        cmm vector gs iep cpumodel diag288 stsi sclp-1g sclp-3g css skrf sie
> +      execute
>        | tee results.txt
>    - grep -q PASS results.txt && ! grep -q FAIL results.txt
>   only:
> 
> base-commit: 20de8c3b54078ebc3df0b47344f9ce55bf52b7a5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-03-20 12:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-03-17 11:23 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v6] s390x: Add tests for execute-type instructions Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2023-03-20 12:25 ` Claudio Imbrenda

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).