* [PATCH v2] phy: samsung: Use readl_poll_timeout function
@ 2020-07-05 6:04 Anand Moon
2020-07-05 18:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Moon @ 2020-07-05 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Vinod Koul, Kukjin Kim,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Marek Szyprowski
User readl_poll_timeout function instead of open
coded handling in crport_handshake function.
Fixes: d8c80bb3b55b ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800")
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
---
Changes v2:
--used the default timeout values.
--Added missing Fixed tags.
---
drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 37 +++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
index e510732afb8b..c97f5fb6a9a0 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
@@ -556,40 +557,28 @@ static int exynos5_usbdrd_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
static int crport_handshake(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd,
u32 val, u32 cmd)
{
- u32 usec = 100;
+ u32 timeout_us = 100, sleep_us = 1;
unsigned int result;
+ int err;
writel(val | cmd, phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG0);
- do {
- result = readl(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1);
- if (result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK)
- break;
-
- udelay(1);
- } while (usec-- > 0);
-
- if (!usec) {
- dev_err(phy_drd->dev,
- "CRPORT handshake timeout1 (0x%08x)\n", val);
+ err = readl_poll_timeout(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1,
+ result, (result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK), sleep_us, timeout_us);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(phy_drd->dev, "CRPORT handshake timeout1 (0x%08x)\n", val);
return -ETIME;
}
- usec = 100;
+ timeout_us = 100;
+ sleep_us = 1;
writel(val, phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG0);
- do {
- result = readl(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1);
- if (!(result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK))
- break;
-
- udelay(1);
- } while (usec-- > 0);
-
- if (!usec) {
- dev_err(phy_drd->dev,
- "CRPORT handshake timeout2 (0x%08x)\n", val);
+ err = readl_poll_timeout(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1,
+ result, !(result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK), sleep_us, timeout_us);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(phy_drd->dev, "CRPORT handshake timeout2 (0x%08x)\n", val);
return -ETIME;
}
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] phy: samsung: Use readl_poll_timeout function
2020-07-05 6:04 [PATCH v2] phy: samsung: Use readl_poll_timeout function Anand Moon
@ 2020-07-05 18:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-07-06 3:47 ` Anand Moon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-07-05 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anand Moon
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-kernel,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Vinod Koul, Kukjin Kim, Marek Szyprowski
On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 06:04:35AM +0000, Anand Moon wrote:
> User readl_poll_timeout function instead of open
> coded handling in crport_handshake function.
Your change does not replace only the "open coded handling" with
readl_poll_timeout(). Your change does more - switches busy waiting with
udelay to a sleeping mode. I am not sure if it is correct but definitly
it should be mentioned. Otherwise how can we be sure that you checked
if this is allowed in this section? Did you test everything with
DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP?
>
> Fixes: d8c80bb3b55b ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800")
> Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes v2:
> --used the default timeout values.
> --Added missing Fixed tags.
> ---
> drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 37 +++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> index e510732afb8b..c97f5fb6a9a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -556,40 +557,28 @@ static int exynos5_usbdrd_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> static int crport_handshake(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd,
> u32 val, u32 cmd)
> {
> - u32 usec = 100;
> + u32 timeout_us = 100, sleep_us = 1;
No need for the variables actually and their type does not match. Just
use the values directly.
> unsigned int result;
> + int err;
>
> writel(val | cmd, phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG0);
>
> - do {
> - result = readl(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1);
> - if (result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK)
> - break;
> -
> - udelay(1);
> - } while (usec-- > 0);
> -
> - if (!usec) {
> - dev_err(phy_drd->dev,
> - "CRPORT handshake timeout1 (0x%08x)\n", val);
> + err = readl_poll_timeout(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1,
> + result, (result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK), sleep_us, timeout_us);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(phy_drd->dev, "CRPORT handshake timeout1 (0x%08x)\n", val);
> return -ETIME;
> }
>
> - usec = 100;
> + timeout_us = 100;
> + sleep_us = 1;
Why defining then again?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
>
> writel(val, phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG0);
>
> - do {
> - result = readl(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1);
> - if (!(result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK))
> - break;
> -
> - udelay(1);
> - } while (usec-- > 0);
> -
> - if (!usec) {
> - dev_err(phy_drd->dev,
> - "CRPORT handshake timeout2 (0x%08x)\n", val);
> + err = readl_poll_timeout(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1,
> + result, !(result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK), sleep_us, timeout_us);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(phy_drd->dev, "CRPORT handshake timeout2 (0x%08x)\n", val);
> return -ETIME;
> }
>
> --
> 2.27.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] phy: samsung: Use readl_poll_timeout function
2020-07-05 18:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2020-07-06 3:47 ` Anand Moon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anand Moon @ 2020-07-06 3:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, Linux Kernel,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Vinod Koul, Kukjin Kim, Marek Szyprowski
Hi Krzysztof,
Thanks for your review comments.
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 23:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 06:04:35AM +0000, Anand Moon wrote:
> > User readl_poll_timeout function instead of open
> > coded handling in crport_handshake function.
>
> Your change does not replace only the "open coded handling" with
> readl_poll_timeout(). Your change does more - switches busy waiting with
> udelay to a sleeping mode. I am not sure if it is correct but definitly
> it should be mentioned. Otherwise how can we be sure that you checked
> if this is allowed in this section? Did you test everything with
> DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP?
Yes this DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP is enabled in exynos_defconfig.
>
Ok how about the below commit message.
Instead of a busy waiting loop while loop using udelay use readl_poll_timeout
function to check the condition is met or timeout occurs in
crport_handshake function.
> >
> > Fixes: d8c80bb3b55b ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800")
> > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Changes v2:
> > --used the default timeout values.
> > --Added missing Fixed tags.
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 37 +++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> > index e510732afb8b..c97f5fb6a9a0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/samsung/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > @@ -556,40 +557,28 @@ static int exynos5_usbdrd_phy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> > static int crport_handshake(struct exynos5_usbdrd_phy *phy_drd,
> > u32 val, u32 cmd)
> > {
> > - u32 usec = 100;
> > + u32 timeout_us = 100, sleep_us = 1;
>
> No need for the variables actually and their type does not match. Just
> use the values directly.
Ok thanks
>
> > unsigned int result;
> > + int err;
> >
> > writel(val | cmd, phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG0);
> >
> > - do {
> > - result = readl(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1);
> > - if (result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK)
> > - break;
> > -
> > - udelay(1);
> > - } while (usec-- > 0);
> > -
> > - if (!usec) {
> > - dev_err(phy_drd->dev,
> > - "CRPORT handshake timeout1 (0x%08x)\n", val);
> > + err = readl_poll_timeout(phy_drd->reg_phy + EXYNOS5_DRD_PHYREG1,
> > + result, (result & PHYREG1_CR_ACK), sleep_us, timeout_us);
> > + if (err) {
> > + dev_err(phy_drd->dev, "CRPORT handshake timeout1 (0x%08x)\n", val);
> > return -ETIME;
> > }
> >
> > - usec = 100;
> > + timeout_us = 100;
> > + sleep_us = 1;
>
> Why defining then again?
I had removed this in this but last minute I added this code again.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best Regards
-Anand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-06 3:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-05 6:04 [PATCH v2] phy: samsung: Use readl_poll_timeout function Anand Moon
2020-07-05 18:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-07-06 3:47 ` Anand Moon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).