linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	don.brace@microsemi.com, Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
	bvanassche@acm.org, hare@suse.com, hch@lst.de,
	Shivasharan Srikanteshwara 
	<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com,
	"PDL,MEGARAIDLINUX" <megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:20:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b3c83d2ea14c73561f215ba15322702@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200623005518.GA843366@T590>

>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 08:24:39AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On 6/17/20 1:26 PM, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ->queued is increased only and not decreased just for debug
> > > > ->purpose so far, so
> > > > it can't be relied for this purpose.
> > >
> > > Thanks. I overlooked that that it is only incremental counter.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > One approach is to add one similar counter, and maintain it by
> > > scheduler's
> > > > insert/dispatch callback.
> > >
> > > I tried below  and I see performance is on expected range.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c index
> > > fdcc2c1..ea201d0 100644
> > > --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > > +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> > > @@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_request(struct request
> > > *rq, bool at_head,
> > >
> > >                  list_add(&rq->queuelist, &list);
> > >                  e->type->ops.insert_requests(hctx, &list, at_head);
> > > +               atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued);
> > >          } else {
> > >                  spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> > >                  __blk_mq_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head); @@
> > > -511,8 +512,10 @@ void blk_mq_sched_insert_requests(struct
> > > blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> > >          percpu_ref_get(&q->q_usage_counter);
> > >
> > >          e = hctx->queue->elevator;
> > > -       if (e && e->type->ops.insert_requests)
> > > +       if (e && e->type->ops.insert_requests) {
> > >                  e->type->ops.insert_requests(hctx, list, false);
> > > +               atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued);
> > > +       }
> > >          else {
> > >                  /*
> > >                   * try to issue requests directly if the hw queue
> > > isn't diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.h b/block/blk-mq-sched.h index
> > > 126021f..946b47a 100644
> > > --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> > > +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.h
> > > @@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_sched_has_work(struct
> > > blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> > >   {
> > >          struct elevator_queue *e = hctx->queue->elevator;
> > >
> > > +       /* If current hctx has not queued any request, there is no
> > > + need to
> > > run.
> > > +        * blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on hctx which has queued IO will
handle
> > > +        * running specific hctx.
> > > +        */
> > > +       if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued))
> > > +               return false;
> > > +
> > >          if (e && e->type->ops.has_work)
> > >                  return e->type->ops.has_work(hctx);
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c index f73a2f9..48f1824
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > > @@ -517,8 +517,10 @@ void blk_mq_free_request(struct request *rq)
> > >          struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
> > >
> > >          if (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELVPRIV) {
> > > -               if (e && e->type->ops.finish_request)
> > > +               if (e && e->type->ops.finish_request) {
> > >                          e->type->ops.finish_request(rq);
> > > +                       atomic_dec(&hctx->elevator_queued);
> > > +               }
> > >                  if (rq->elv.icq) {
> > >                          put_io_context(rq->elv.icq->ioc);
> > >                          rq->elv.icq = NULL; @@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@
> > > blk_mq_alloc_hctx(struct request_queue *q, struct blk_mq_tag_set
> > > *set,
> > >                  goto free_hctx;
> > >
> > >          atomic_set(&hctx->nr_active, 0);
> > > +       atomic_set(&hctx->elevator_queued, 0);
> > >          if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> > >                  node = set->numa_node;
> > >          hctx->numa_node = node;
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h index
> > > 66711c7..ea1ddb1 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
> > > @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
> > >           * shared across request queues.
> > >           */
> > >          atomic_t                nr_active;
> > > +       /**
> > > +        * @elevator_queued: Number of queued requests on hctx.
> > > +        */
> > > +       atomic_t                elevator_queued;
> > >
> > >          /** @cpuhp_online: List to store request if CPU is going to
die */
> > >          struct hlist_node       cpuhp_online;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Would it make sense to move it into the elevator itself?

I am not sure where exactly I should add this counter since I need counter
per hctx. Elevator data is per request object.
Please suggest.

>
> That is my initial suggestion, and the counter is just done for bfq &
mq-
> deadline, then we needn't to pay the cost for others.

I have updated patch -

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index a1123d4..3e0005c 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4640,6 +4640,12 @@ static bool bfq_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx)
 {
        struct bfq_data *bfqd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;

+       /* If current hctx has not queued any request, there is no need to
run.
+        * blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on hctx which has queued IO will handle
+        * running specific hctx.
+        */
+       if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued))
+               return false;
        /*
         * Avoiding lock: a race on bfqd->busy_queues should cause at
         * most a call to dispatch for nothing
@@ -5554,6 +5561,7 @@ static void bfq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx,
                rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
                list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
                bfq_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head);
+              atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued);
        }
 }

@@ -5925,6 +5933,7 @@ static void bfq_finish_requeue_request(struct
request *rq)

        if (likely(rq->rq_flags & RQF_STARTED)) {
                unsigned long flags;
+              struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *mq_hctx = rq->mq_hctx;

                spin_lock_irqsave(&bfqd->lock, flags);

@@ -5934,6 +5943,7 @@ static void bfq_finish_requeue_request(struct
request *rq)
                bfq_completed_request(bfqq, bfqd);
                bfq_finish_requeue_request_body(bfqq);

+              atomic_dec(&hctx->elevator_queued);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bfqd->lock, flags);
        } else {
                /*
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.h b/block/blk-mq-sched.h
index 126021f..946b47a 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.h
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.h
@@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ static inline bool blk_mq_sched_has_work(struct
blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
        struct elevator_queue *e = hctx->queue->elevator;

+       /* If current hctx has not queued any request, there is no need to
run.
+        * blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on hctx which has queued IO will handle
+        * running specific hctx.
+        */
+       if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued))
+               return false;
+
        if (e && e->type->ops.has_work)
                return e->type->ops.has_work(hctx);

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index f73a2f9..82dd152 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2571,6 +2571,7 @@ blk_mq_alloc_hctx(struct request_queue *q, struct
blk_mq_tag_set *set,
                goto free_hctx;

        atomic_set(&hctx->nr_active, 0);
+      atomic_set(&hctx->elevator_queued, 0);
        if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
                node = set->numa_node;
        hctx->numa_node = node;
diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index b57470e..703ac55 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -533,6 +533,7 @@ static void dd_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
*hctx,
                rq = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
                list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
                dd_insert_request(hctx, rq, at_head);
+              atomic_inc(&hctx->elevator_queued);
        }
        spin_unlock(&dd->lock);
 }
@@ -562,6 +563,7 @@ static void dd_prepare_request(struct request *rq)
 static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 {
        struct request_queue *q = rq->q;
+      struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;

        if (blk_queue_is_zoned(q)) {
                struct deadline_data *dd = q->elevator->elevator_data;
@@ -570,15 +572,23 @@ static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
                spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
                blk_req_zone_write_unlock(rq);
                if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[WRITE]))
-                       blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(rq->mq_hctx);
+                       blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
        }
+       atomic_dec(&hctx->elevator_queued);
 }

 static bool dd_has_work(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
        struct deadline_data *dd = hctx->queue->elevator->elevator_data;

+       /* If current hctx has not queued any request, there is no need to
run.
+        * blk_mq_run_hw_queue() on hctx which has queued IO will handle
+        * running specific hctx.
+        */
+       if (!atomic_read(&hctx->elevator_queued))
+               return false;
+
        return !list_empty_careful(&dd->dispatch) ||
                !list_empty_careful(&dd->fifo_list[0]) ||
                !list_empty_careful(&dd->fifo_list[1]);
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 66711c7..ea1ddb1 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
         * shared across request queues.
         */
        atomic_t                nr_active;
+       /**
+        * @elevator_queued: Number of queued requests on hctx.
+        */
+       atomic_t                elevator_queued;

        /** @cpuhp_online: List to store request if CPU is going to die */
        struct hlist_node       cpuhp_online;


>
> Thanks,
> Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-23 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-10 17:29 [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 01/12] blk-mq: rename BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED as BLK_MQ_F_TAG_QUEUE_SHARED John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 02/12] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth() John Garry
2020-06-11  2:57   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11  8:26     ` John Garry
2020-06-23 11:25       ` John Garry
2020-06-23 14:23         ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-24  8:13           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-29 16:18             ` John Garry
2020-08-10 16:51           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:01             ` John Garry
2020-08-11 16:34               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 03/12] blk-mq: Use pointers for blk_mq_tags bitmap tags John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 04/12] blk-mq: Facilitate a shared sbitmap per tagset John Garry
2020-06-11  3:37   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:09     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 05/12] blk-mq: Record nr_active_requests per queue for when using shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-06-11  4:04   ` Ming Lei
2020-06-11 10:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 06/12] blk-mq: Record active_queues_shared_sbitmap per tag_set " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:22     ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a " John Garry
2020-06-11 13:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-11 14:33     ` John Garry
2020-06-12  6:06       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-29 15:32         ` About sbitmap_bitmap_show() and cleared bits (was Re: [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap) John Garry
2020-06-30  6:33           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-30  7:30             ` John Garry
2020-06-30 11:36               ` John Garry
2020-06-30 14:55           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-07-13  9:41         ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/12] blk-mq: Add support in hctx_tags_bitmap_show() for a shared sbitmap John Garry
2020-07-13 12:20           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 08/12] scsi: Add template flag 'host_tagset' John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 09/12] scsi: hisi_sas: Switch v3 hw to MQ John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 10/12] megaraid_sas: switch fusion adapters " John Garry
2020-07-02 10:23   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-06  8:23     ` John Garry
2020-07-06  8:45       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06  9:26         ` John Garry
2020-07-06  9:40           ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-06 19:19       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07  7:58         ` John Garry
2020-07-07 14:45           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-07 16:17             ` John Garry
2020-07-09 19:01               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-10  8:10                 ` John Garry
2020-07-13  7:55                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-13  8:42                     ` John Garry
2020-07-19 19:07                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  7:23                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-20  9:18                         ` John Garry
2020-07-21  1:13                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-21  6:53                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  4:12                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  5:30                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-22  8:04                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-22  9:32                                   ` John Garry
2020-07-23 14:07                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-07-23 17:29                                       ` John Garry
2020-07-24  2:47                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  7:54                                           ` John Garry
2020-07-28  8:45                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29  5:25                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-29 15:36                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-29 18:31                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-04  8:36                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-04  9:27                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-05  8:40                                                         ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 10:25                                                           ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 13:38                                                             ` Ming Lei
2020-08-06 14:37                                                               ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-06 15:29                                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-08-08 19:05                                                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-09  2:16                                                                     ` Ming Lei
2020-08-10 16:38                                                                       ` Kashyap Desai
2020-08-11  8:09                                                                         ` John Garry
2020-08-04 17:00                                               ` John Garry
2020-08-05  2:56                                                 ` Ming Lei
2020-07-28  8:01                                   ` Kashyap Desai
2020-07-08 11:31         ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 11/12] smartpqi: enable host tagset John Garry
2020-07-14 13:16   ` John Garry
2020-07-14 13:31     ` John Garry
2020-07-14 18:16       ` Don.Brace
2020-07-15  7:28         ` John Garry
2020-07-14 14:02     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-18  8:33       ` John Garry
2020-06-10 17:29 ` [PATCH RFC v7 12/12] hpsa: enable host_tagset and switch to MQ John Garry
2020-07-14  7:37   ` John Garry
2020-07-14  7:41     ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14  7:52       ` John Garry
2020-07-14  8:06         ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14  9:53           ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:14             ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:43               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:19             ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-14 10:35               ` John Garry
2020-07-14 10:44               ` Ming Lei
2020-07-14 10:52                 ` John Garry
2020-07-14 12:04                   ` Ming Lei
2020-08-03 20:39         ` Don.Brace
2020-08-04  9:27           ` John Garry
2020-08-04 15:18             ` Don.Brace
2020-08-05 11:21               ` John Garry
2020-08-14 21:04                 ` Don.Brace
2020-08-17  8:00                   ` John Garry
2020-08-17 18:39                     ` Don.Brace
2020-08-18  7:14                       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-07-16 16:14     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-16 19:45     ` Don.Brace
2020-07-17 10:11       ` John Garry
2020-06-11  3:07 ` [PATCH RFC v7 00/12] blk-mq/scsi: Provide hostwide shared tags for SCSI HBAs Ming Lei
2020-06-11  9:35   ` John Garry
2020-06-12 18:47     ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-15  2:13       ` Ming Lei
2020-06-15  6:57         ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-16  1:00           ` Ming Lei
2020-06-17 11:26             ` Kashyap Desai
2020-06-22  6:24               ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-06-23  0:55                 ` Ming Lei
2020-06-23 11:50                   ` Kashyap Desai [this message]
2020-06-23 12:11                   ` Kashyap Desai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3b3c83d2ea14c73561f215ba15322702@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=don.brace@microsemi.com \
    --cc=esc.storagedev@microsemi.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).