linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com
Cc: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com,
	peter.wang@mediatek.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com,
	andy.teng@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] block: bypass blk_set_runtime_active for uninitialized q->dev
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 16:13:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66fddf12-0dc4-1c73-affd-f8404e87342f@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568183562-18241-2-git-send-email-stanley.chu@mediatek.com>

On 9/11/19 12:32 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Some devices may skip blk_pm_runtime_init() and have null pointer
> in its request_queue->dev. For example, SCSI devices of UFS Well-Known
> LUNs.
> 
> Currently the null pointer is checked by the user of
> blk_set_runtime_active(), i.e., scsi_dev_type_resume(). It is better to
> check it by blk_set_runtime_active() itself instead of by its users.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-pm.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-pm.c b/block/blk-pm.c
> index 0a028c189897..56ed94f7a2a3 100644
> --- a/block/blk-pm.c
> +++ b/block/blk-pm.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_post_runtime_resume);
>    */
>   void blk_set_runtime_active(struct request_queue *q)
>   {
> +	if (!q->dev)
> +		return;
> +
>   	spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
>   	q->rpm_status = RPM_ACTIVE;
>   	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(q->dev);

I'd prefer just doing:

	if (q->dev) {
		...
	}

instead. Other than that little complaint, looks good to me.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-11 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-11  6:32 [PATCH v1] fixup null q->dev checking in both block and scsi layer Stanley Chu
2019-09-11  6:32 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] block: bypass blk_set_runtime_active for uninitialized q->dev Stanley Chu
2019-09-11 22:13   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-09-12  8:33     ` Stanley Chu
2019-09-11  6:32 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: core: remove dummy q->dev check Stanley Chu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66fddf12-0dc4-1c73-affd-f8404e87342f@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=andy.teng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuohong.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).