linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/20] scsi: ufs: Optimize the command queueing code
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 09:46:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2599b2c-208c-3333-61f0-d61a269b53d4@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119195743.2817-19-bvanassche@acm.org>

On 11/19/2021 11:57 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Remove the clock scaling lock from ufshcd_queuecommand() since it is a
> performance bottleneck. Freeze request queues instead of polling the
> doorbell registers to wait until pending commands have completed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 124 +++++++++++++-------------------------
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |   1 +
>   2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index a6d3f71c6b00..9cf4a22f1950 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -1070,65 +1070,6 @@ static bool ufshcd_is_devfreq_scaling_required(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   	return false;
>   }
>   
[...]
>   /**
>    * ufshcd_scale_gear - scale up/down UFS gear
>    * @hba: per adapter instance
> @@ -1176,37 +1117,63 @@ static int ufshcd_scale_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
>   
>   static int ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   {
> -	#define DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US		(1000 * 1000) /* 1 sec */
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev;
> +
>   	/*
> -	 * make sure that there are no outstanding requests when
> -	 * clock scaling is in progress
> +	 * Make sure that no commands are in progress while the clock frequency
> +	 * is being modified.
> +	 *
> +	 * Since ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() and ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd() lock
> +	 * the clk_scaling_lock before calling blk_get_request(), lock
> +	 * clk_scaling_lock before freezing the request queues to prevent lock
> +	 * inversion.
>   	 */
> -	ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
>   	down_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> -
> -	if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed ||
> -	    ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US)) {
> -		ret = -EBUSY;
> -		up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> -		ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> +	if (!hba->clk_scaling.is_allowed)
> +		goto busy;
> +	blk_freeze_queue_start(hba->tmf_queue);
> +	blk_freeze_queue_start(hba->cmd_queue);
> +	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
> +		blk_freeze_queue_start(sdev->request_queue);
This would still issue the requests present in the queue before freezing 
and that's a concern.
> +	/*
> +	 * Calling synchronize_rcu_expedited() reduces the time required to
> +	 * freeze request queues from milliseconds to microseconds.
> +	 */
> +	synchronize_rcu_expedited();
> +	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
> +		if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(sdev->request_queue, HZ)
> +		    <= 0)
> +			goto unfreeze;
> +	if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(hba->cmd_queue, HZ) <= 0 ||
> +	    blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(hba->tmf_queue, HZ / 10) <= 0)
> +		goto unfreeze;
>   	/* let's not get into low power until clock scaling is completed */
>   	ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
> +	return 0;
>   
> -out:
> -	return ret;
> +unfreeze:
> +	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
> +		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> +	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->cmd_queue);
> +	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->tmf_queue);
> +
> +busy:
> +	up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> +	return -EBUSY;
>   }
>   
>   static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool writelock)
>   {
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev;
> +
> +	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
> +		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> +	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->cmd_queue);
> +	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->tmf_queue);
>   	if (writelock)
>   		up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
>   	else
>   		up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> -	ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
>   	ufshcd_release(hba);
>   }
>   
> @@ -2699,9 +2666,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   
>   	WARN_ONCE(tag < 0, "Invalid tag %d\n", tag);
>   
> -	if (!down_read_trylock(&hba->clk_scaling_lock))
> -		return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * Allows the UFS error handler to wait for prior ufshcd_queuecommand()
>   	 * calls.
> @@ -2790,8 +2754,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
>   out:
>   	rcu_read_unlock();
>   
> -	up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
> -
>   	if (ufs_trigger_eh()) {
>   		unsigned long flags;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index e9bc07c69a80..7ec463c97d64 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_monitor {
>    * @clk_list_head: UFS host controller clocks list node head
>    * @pwr_info: holds current power mode
>    * @max_pwr_info: keeps the device max valid pwm
> + * @clk_scaling_lock: used to serialize device commands and clock scaling
>    * @desc_size: descriptor sizes reported by device
>    * @urgent_bkops_lvl: keeps track of urgent bkops level for device
>    * @is_urgent_bkops_lvl_checked: keeps track if the urgent bkops level for
> 


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-22 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-19 19:57 [PATCH v2 00/20] UFS patches for kernel v5.17 Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] block: Add a flag for internal commands Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22  8:46   ` John Garry
2021-11-22 17:38     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] scsi: core: Unexport scsi_track_queue_full() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] scsi: core: Fix scsi_device_max_queue_depth() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] scsi: core: Fix a race between scsi_done() and scsi_times_out() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] scsi: core: Add support for internal commands Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22  8:58   ` John Garry
2021-11-22 17:46     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 18:08       ` John Garry
2021-11-22 19:04       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23  8:13       ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-23 17:46         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 19:18           ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24  6:33             ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] scsi: core: Add support for reserved tags Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22  8:15   ` John Garry
2021-11-22 17:25     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 18:13       ` John Garry
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] scsi: ufs: Rename a function argument Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 20:25   ` Bean Huo
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] scsi: ufs: Remove is_rpmb_wlun() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] scsi: ufs: Remove the sdev_rpmb member Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] scsi: ufs: Remove dead code Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 11:11   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-29 19:12     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] scsi: ufs: Switch to scsi_(get|put)_internal_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 12:20   ` Bean Huo
2021-11-23 17:54     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 19:41     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 18:18       ` Bean Huo
2021-11-24 11:02   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-24 11:15     ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-29 19:32     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30  6:41       ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 17:51         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 19:15           ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 19:21             ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] scsi: ufs: Rework ufshcd_change_queue_depth() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock in the error handler Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30  8:54   ` Bean Huo
2021-11-30 17:52     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 19:32     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-12-01 13:44       ` Bean Huo
2021-12-01 18:31         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 12:03   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 18:00     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 19:02       ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30 19:16         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] scsi: ufs: Improve SCSI abort handling Bart Van Assche
2021-11-24 12:28   ` Adrian Hunter
2021-11-30  4:13     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] scsi: ufs: Fix a kernel crash during shutdown Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] scsi: ufs: Stop using the clock scaling lock in the error handler Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] scsi: ufs: Optimize the command queueing code Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 17:46   ` Asutosh Das (asd) [this message]
2021-11-22 18:13     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-22 23:02       ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-11-22 23:48         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-23 18:24           ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2021-12-01 18:33             ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] scsi: ufs: Implement polling support Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30  8:43   ` Bean Huo
2021-11-30  8:57     ` Avri Altman
2021-11-30  9:15       ` Bean Huo
2021-11-30 14:26     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 15:40       ` Bean Huo
2021-11-30 17:34         ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-30 17:37     ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 19:57 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] scsi: ufs: Fix race conditions related to driver data Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a2599b2c-208c-3333-61f0-d61a269b53d4@codeaurora.org \
    --to=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=keosung.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).