[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 075/266] apparmor: fix introspection of of task mode for unconfined tasks

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 075/266] apparmor: fix introspection of of task mode for unconfined tasks

[Sasha Levin]

From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

[ Upstream commit dd2569fbb053719f7df7ef8fdbb45cf47156a701 ]

Fix two issues with introspecting the task mode.

1. If a task is attached to a unconfined profile that is not the
   ns->unconfined profile then. Mode the mode is always reported
   as -

      $ ps -Z
      LABEL                               PID TTY          TIME CMD
      unconfined                         1287 pts/0    00:00:01 bash
      test (-)                           1892 pts/0    00:00:00 ps

   instead of the correct value of (unconfined) as shown below

      $ ps -Z
      LABEL                               PID TTY          TIME CMD
      unconfined                         2483 pts/0    00:00:01 bash
      test (unconfined)                  3591 pts/0    00:00:00 ps

2. if a task is confined by a stack of profiles that are unconfined
   the output of label mode is again the incorrect value of (-) like
   above, instead of (unconfined). This is because the visibile
   profile count increment is skipped by the special casing of
   unconfined.

Fixes: f1bd904175e8 ("apparmor: add the base fns() for domain labels")
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 security/apparmor/label.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/label.c b/security/apparmor/label.c
index 470693239e64..6c3acae701ef 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/label.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/label.c
@@ -1531,13 +1531,13 @@ static const char *label_modename(struct aa_ns *ns, struct aa_label *label,
 
 	label_for_each(i, label, profile) {
 		if (aa_ns_visible(ns, profile->ns, flags & FLAG_VIEW_SUBNS)) {
-			if (profile->mode == APPARMOR_UNCONFINED)
+			count++;
+			if (profile == profile->ns->unconfined)
 				/* special case unconfined so stacks with
 				 * unconfined don't report as mixed. ie.
 				 * profile_foo//&:ns1:unconfined (mixed)
 				 */
 				continue;
-			count++;
 			if (mode == -1)
 				mode = profile->mode;
 			else if (mode != profile->mode)
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 077/266] apparmor: check/put label on apparmor_sk_clone_security()

[Sasha Levin]

From: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>

[ Upstream commit 3b646abc5bc6c0df649daea4c2c976bd4d47e4c8 ]

Currently apparmor_sk_clone_security() does not check for existing
label/peer in the 'new' struct sock; it just overwrites it, if any
(with another reference to the label of the source sock.)

    static void apparmor_sk_clone_security(const struct sock *sk,
                                           struct sock *newsk)
    {
            struct aa_sk_ctx *ctx = SK_CTX(sk);
            struct aa_sk_ctx *new = SK_CTX(newsk);

            new->label = aa_get_label(ctx->label);
            new->peer = aa_get_label(ctx->peer);
    }

This might leak label references, which might overflow under load.
Thus, check for and put labels, to prevent such errors.

Note this is similarly done on:

    static int apparmor_socket_post_create(struct socket *sock, ...)
    ...
            if (sock->sk) {
                    struct aa_sk_ctx *ctx = SK_CTX(sock->sk);

                    aa_put_label(ctx->label);
                    ctx->label = aa_get_label(label);
            }
    ...

Context:
-------

The label reference count leak is observed if apparmor_sock_graft()
is called previously: this sets the 'ctx->label' field by getting
a reference to the current label (later overwritten, without put.)

    static void apparmor_sock_graft(struct sock *sk, ...)
    {
            struct aa_sk_ctx *ctx = SK_CTX(sk);

            if (!ctx->label)
                    ctx->label = aa_get_current_label();
    }

And that is the case on crypto/af_alg.c:af_alg_accept():

    int af_alg_accept(struct sock *sk, struct socket *newsock, ...)
    ...
            struct sock *sk2;
            ...
            sk2 = sk_alloc(...);
            ...
            security_sock_graft(sk2, newsock);
            security_sk_clone(sk, sk2);
    ...

Apparently both calls are done on their own right, especially for
other LSMs, being introduced in 2010/2014, before apparmor socket
mediation in 2017 (see commits [1,2,3,4]).

So, it looks OK there! Let's fix the reference leak in apparmor.

Test-case:
---------

Exercise that code path enough to overflow label reference count.

    $ cat aa-refcnt-af_alg.c
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <string.h>
    #include <unistd.h>
    #include <sys/socket.h>
    #include <linux/if_alg.h>

    int main() {
            int sockfd;
            struct sockaddr_alg sa;

            /* Setup the crypto API socket */
            sockfd = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
            if (sockfd < 0) {
                    perror("socket");
                    return 1;
            }

            memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
            sa.salg_family = AF_ALG;
            strcpy((char *) sa.salg_type, "rng");
            strcpy((char *) sa.salg_name, "stdrng");

            if (bind(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *) &sa, sizeof(sa)) < 0) {
                    perror("bind");
                    return 1;
            }

            /* Accept a "connection" and close it; repeat. */
            while (!close(accept(sockfd, NULL, 0)));

            return 0;
    }

    $ gcc -o aa-refcnt-af_alg aa-refcnt-af_alg.c

    $ ./aa-refcnt-af_alg
    <a few hours later>

    [ 9928.475953] refcount_t overflow at apparmor_sk_clone_security+0x37/0x70 in aa-refcnt-af_alg[1322], uid/euid: 1000/1000
    ...
    [ 9928.507443] RIP: 0010:apparmor_sk_clone_security+0x37/0x70
    ...
    [ 9928.514286]  security_sk_clone+0x33/0x50
    [ 9928.514807]  af_alg_accept+0x81/0x1c0 [af_alg]
    [ 9928.516091]  alg_accept+0x15/0x20 [af_alg]
    [ 9928.516682]  SYSC_accept4+0xff/0x210
    [ 9928.519609]  SyS_accept+0x10/0x20
    [ 9928.520190]  do_syscall_64+0x73/0x130
    [ 9928.520808]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2

Note that other messages may be seen, not just overflow, depending on
the value being incremented by kref_get(); on another run:

    [ 7273.182666] refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.
    ...
    [ 7273.185789] refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.

Kprobes:
-------

Using kprobe events to monitor sk -> sk_security -> label -> count (kref):

Original v5.7 (one reference leak every iteration)

 ... (af_alg_accept+0x0/0x1c0) label=0xffff8a0f36c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x11fd2
 ... (af_alg_release_parent+0x0/0xd0) label=0xffff8a0f36c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x11fd4
 ... (af_alg_accept+0x0/0x1c0) label=0xffff8a0f36c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x11fd3
 ... (af_alg_release_parent+0x0/0xd0) label=0xffff8a0f36c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x11fd5
 ... (af_alg_accept+0x0/0x1c0) label=0xffff8a0f36c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x11fd4
 ... (af_alg_release_parent+0x0/0xd0) label=0xffff8a0f36c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x11fd6

Patched v5.7 (zero reference leak per iteration)

 ... (af_alg_accept+0x0/0x1c0) label=0xffff9ff376c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x593
 ... (af_alg_release_parent+0x0/0xd0) label=0xffff9ff376c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x594
 ... (af_alg_accept+0x0/0x1c0) label=0xffff9ff376c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x593
 ... (af_alg_release_parent+0x0/0xd0) label=0xffff9ff376c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x594
 ... (af_alg_accept+0x0/0x1c0) label=0xffff9ff376c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x593
 ... (af_alg_release_parent+0x0/0xd0) label=0xffff9ff376c25eb0 label_refcnt=0x594

Commits:
-------

[1] commit 507cad355fc9 ("crypto: af_alg - Make sure sk_security is initialized on accept()ed sockets")
[2] commit 4c63f83c2c2e ("crypto: af_alg - properly label AF_ALG socket")
[3] commit 2acce6aa9f65 ("Networking") a.k.a ("crypto: af_alg - Avoid sock_graft call warning)
[4] commit 56974a6fcfef ("apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation")

Fixes: 56974a6fcfef ("apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation")
Reported-by: Brian Moyles <bmoyles@netflix.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 security/apparmor/lsm.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index ec3a928af829..e31965dc6dd1 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -791,7 +791,12 @@ static void apparmor_sk_clone_security(const struct sock *sk,
 	struct aa_sk_ctx *ctx = SK_CTX(sk);
 	struct aa_sk_ctx *new = SK_CTX(newsk);
 
+	if (new->label)
+		aa_put_label(new->label);
 	new->label = aa_get_label(ctx->label);
+
+	if (new->peer)
+		aa_put_label(new->peer);
 	new->peer = aa_get_label(ctx->peer);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 083/266] apparmor: fix nnp subset test for unconfined

[Sasha Levin]

From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>

[ Upstream commit 3ed4aaa94fc07db3cd0c91be95e3e1b9782a2710 ]

The subset test is not taking into account the unconfined exception
which will cause profile transitions in the stacked confinement
case to fail when no_new_privs is applied.

This fixes a regression introduced in the fix for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839037

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844186
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 security/apparmor/domain.c        |  9 +++++----
 security/apparmor/include/label.h |  1 +
 security/apparmor/label.c         | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c
index 5dedc0173b02..1a33f490e667 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/domain.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c
@@ -935,7 +935,8 @@ int apparmor_bprm_set_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	 * aways results in a further reduction of permissions.
 	 */
 	if ((bprm->unsafe & LSM_UNSAFE_NO_NEW_PRIVS) &&
-	    !unconfined(label) && !aa_label_is_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) {
+	    !unconfined(label) &&
+	    !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) {
 		error = -EPERM;
 		info = "no new privs";
 		goto audit;
@@ -1213,7 +1214,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, int flags)
 		 * reduce restrictions.
 		 */
 		if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(label) &&
-		    !aa_label_is_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) {
+		    !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) {
 			/* not an apparmor denial per se, so don't log it */
 			AA_DEBUG("no_new_privs - change_hat denied");
 			error = -EPERM;
@@ -1234,7 +1235,7 @@ int aa_change_hat(const char *hats[], int count, u64 token, int flags)
 		 * reduce restrictions.
 		 */
 		if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(label) &&
-		    !aa_label_is_subset(previous, ctx->nnp)) {
+		    !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(previous, ctx->nnp)) {
 			/* not an apparmor denial per se, so don't log it */
 			AA_DEBUG("no_new_privs - change_hat denied");
 			error = -EPERM;
@@ -1429,7 +1430,7 @@ int aa_change_profile(const char *fqname, int flags)
 		 * reduce restrictions.
 		 */
 		if (task_no_new_privs(current) && !unconfined(label) &&
-		    !aa_label_is_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) {
+		    !aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(new, ctx->nnp)) {
 			/* not an apparmor denial per se, so don't log it */
 			AA_DEBUG("no_new_privs - change_hat denied");
 			error = -EPERM;
diff --git a/security/apparmor/include/label.h b/security/apparmor/include/label.h
index 47942c4ba7ca..255764ab06e2 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/include/label.h
+++ b/security/apparmor/include/label.h
@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ bool aa_label_init(struct aa_label *label, int size, gfp_t gfp);
 struct aa_label *aa_label_alloc(int size, struct aa_proxy *proxy, gfp_t gfp);
 
 bool aa_label_is_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub);
+bool aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub);
 struct aa_profile *__aa_label_next_not_in_set(struct label_it *I,
 					     struct aa_label *set,
 					     struct aa_label *sub);
diff --git a/security/apparmor/label.c b/security/apparmor/label.c
index 6c3acae701ef..5f324d63ceaa 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/label.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/label.c
@@ -550,6 +550,39 @@ bool aa_label_is_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub)
 	return __aa_label_next_not_in_set(&i, set, sub) == NULL;
 }
 
+/**
+ * aa_label_is_unconfined_subset - test if @sub is a subset of @set
+ * @set: label to test against
+ * @sub: label to test if is subset of @set
+ *
+ * This checks for subset but taking into account unconfined. IF
+ * @sub contains an unconfined profile that does not have a matching
+ * unconfined in @set then this will not cause the test to fail.
+ * Conversely we don't care about an unconfined in @set that is not in
+ * @sub
+ *
+ * Returns: true if @sub is special_subset of @set
+ *     else false
+ */
+bool aa_label_is_unconfined_subset(struct aa_label *set, struct aa_label *sub)
+{
+	struct label_it i = { };
+	struct aa_profile *p;
+
+	AA_BUG(!set);
+	AA_BUG(!sub);
+
+	if (sub == set)
+		return true;
+
+	do {
+		p = __aa_label_next_not_in_set(&i, set, sub);
+		if (p && !profile_unconfined(p))
+			break;
+	} while (p);
+
+	return p == NULL;
+}
 
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1