Re: [PATCH v2] integrity: Add declarations to init_once void arguments.

[Jiele Zhao <unclexiaole@gmail.com>]

Okay, thank you. I'll keep an eye on that !

On 2021/4/10 2:55, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Hi Jiele,
>
> On Wed, 2021-04-07 at 01:44 +0000, Jiele Zhao wrote:
>> init_once is a callback to kmem_cache_create. The parameter
>> type of this function is void *, so it's better to give a
>> explicit cast here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiele Zhao <unclexiaole@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   security/integrity/iint.c         | 2 +-
>>   security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +-
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/iint.c b/security/integrity/iint.c
>> index 0ba01847e836..fca8a9409e4a 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/iint.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/iint.c
>> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ void integrity_inode_free(struct inode *inode)
>>   
>>   static void init_once(void *foo)
>>   {
>> -	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = foo;
>> +	struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = (struct integrity_iint_cache *) foo;
>>   
>>   	memset(iint, 0, sizeof(*iint));
>>   	iint->ima_file_status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>> index 9ef748ea829f..03bef720ab44 100644
>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>> @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
>>   }
>>   
>>   /**
>> - * ima_path_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
>> + * ima_file_check - based on policy, collect/store measurement.
>>    * @file: pointer to the file to be measured
>>    * @mask: contains MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC or MAY_APPEND
>>    *
> This change was already posted as "ima: Fix function name error in
> comment".  I've dropped this hunk.  In the future, please review your
> patch line by line before posting.
>
> Applied to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity.git
> next-integrity
>
> thanks,
>
> Mimi
>