From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
kexec devel list <kexec@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Avoid build warning when !CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:18:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACdnJuuG8vy37KaoXHU-bzr-VLEwnUWWiCH_zKWuvYdGDDAV5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190814052359.GA10664@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:24 PM Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote:
> I can not get the whole thread, also not sure which tree it should
> apply.
This should be against -next.
> Also I think it should be good to split the preparation piece of kexec
> and send them separately. Since it is improve the signature
> verification logic, they do not necessarily depend on the lockdown
> series.
Sorry, which preparation piece? There shouldn't be any logic change in
this patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-13 19:21 [PATCH 0/6] lockdown fixups Matthew Garrett
2019-08-13 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] tracefs: Fix potential null dereference in default_file_open() Matthew Garrett
2019-08-13 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] early_security_init() needs a stub got !CONFIG_SECURITY Matthew Garrett
2019-08-13 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] Avoid build warning when !CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG Matthew Garrett
2019-08-14 5:23 ` Dave Young
2019-08-14 17:18 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2019-08-13 19:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] security: fix ptr_ret.cocci warnings Matthew Garrett
2019-08-13 19:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] kexec: s/KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG/KEXEC_SIG/ for consistency Matthew Garrett
2019-08-13 19:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] Document locked_down LSM hook Matthew Garrett
2019-08-13 22:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] lockdown fixups James Morris
2019-08-14 5:06 ` James Morris
2019-08-14 17:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2019-08-14 18:24 ` James Morris
2019-08-14 18:26 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACdnJuuG8vy37KaoXHU-bzr-VLEwnUWWiCH_zKWuvYdGDDAV5A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).